THE GOLDEN RULE
STUDENT HANDBOOK
2021-2022
2 | Page
CONTENTS
The Golden Rule Review Committee (GRRC) ......................................................................................... 4
UCF-5.006 Student Rights and Responsibilities ..................................................................................... 6
UCF-5.0065 Involuntary Withdrawal Procedures; Mandated Assessment ....................................... 16
UCF-5.007 Student Conduct and Academic Integrity; Scope; Student Conduct Records; Medical
Emergencies (Alcohol & Drug) ................................................................................................................ 21
UCF-5.008 Rules of Conduct.................................................................................................................. 24
UCF-5.009 Student Conduct Review Process; Sanctions .................................................................... 33
UCF-5.010 Student Conduct Appeals ................................................................................................... 41
UCF-5.011 Scope; Authority; Principles of Student Group Responsibility; Violations of Law and
Organizational Rules of Conduct Violations; Conduct Records; Medical Emergencies (Alcohol &
Drugs) ......................................................................................................................................................... 45
UCF-5.012 Organizational Rules of Conduct .................................................................................... 48
UCF-5.013 Organization Conduct Review Process; Sanctions; Appeals ........................................... 54
UCF-5.015 Student Academic Misconduct Review Process ................................................................ 64
UCF-5.016 Student Academic Appeals ................................................................................................. 69
UCF-5.017 Appeals of Graduate Program Actions or Decisions ........................................................ 76
University Registrar .................................................................................................................................. 80
Student Health Services ............................................................................................................................ 83
Office of Student Involvement ................................................................................................................. 86
Student Union ............................................................................................................................................ 94
3 | Page
The University of Central Florida is a community brought together by the tenets of the
UCF Creed: Integrity, Scholarship, Community, Creativity, and Excellence. These are
the values that guide our conduct, performance, and decisions. To be successful at
UCF, there is an expectation that we embrace and promote these core values in
everything we do as a sign of our membership in the UCF community.
Whether you are a new or continuing undergraduate, graduate or professional student
at UCF, there are certain responsibilities that students must uphold as members of our
community. The Golden Rule is a compilation of policies and procedures from different
university areas intended to define the rights and responsibilities afforded to students
and provide a better understanding of each student’s role as a member of the UCF
community.
The Golden Rule is published online annually but can be revised at any time to reflect
new and modified information deemed critical by the university. Changes will be
communicated through online resources and by other means, at which time the
revisions will supersede previously published information.
The Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities (OSRR) within the Division of Student
Development and Enrollment Services (SDES) is delegated the responsibility for
reviewing, assembling, and communicating information included in The Golden Rule.
Students are given the opportunity to periodically influence the rules that they are
expected to adhere to through the Golden Rule Review Committee.
UCF values diversity, equity, and the inclusion of all in our community. Accordingly, The
University shall not discriminate in offering access to its educational programs and
activities on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, national origin, religion, non-religion, age,
genetic information, sex (including pregnancy and parental status), gender identity or
expression, sexual orientation, marital status, physical or mental disability (including
learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and past or present history of mental
illness), political affiliations, veteran status (as protected under the Vietnam Era
Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act), or membership in any other protected classes
as set forth in state or federal law. It is our policy to treat all people with dignity and
respect.
For more information or further clarification, please contact OSRR at 407-823-4638, visit
their website, http://osrr.sdes.ucf.edu for the most current version of The Golden
Rule or email them at osrr@ucf.edu.
4 | Page
The Golden Rule Review Committee (GRRC)
This committee shall be established for the periodic review of responding to the changing needs
of the student body with regard to the Golden Rule. It is intended to give the students a voice in
determining the rules to which they shall adhere.
a. Membership
1. Membership to the committee shall consist of 7 students, 4 of which shall
be appointed by the Student Body President and 3 shall be selected by the
Vice President for Student Development and Enrollment Services.
2. There shall be an application and selection process established by the
Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities.
3. An eighth (8th) member of the Golden Rule Review Committee shall be
appointed by the Vice President for Student Development and Enrollment
Services. This member shall act as an alternate and shall reserve voting
privileges in absence of a voting committee member.
4. It is suggested that the Judicial Advisor of the Student Government
Association be considered for appointment to the committee.
(i) If the committee is already full, the Judicial Advisor may be
included as an additional non-voting member.
b. Ex-Officio
1. Any student enrolled at the University shall be permitted to attend GRRC
meetings.
(i) These students shall be considered ex-officio.
(ii) They also shall have the right to debate on any proposal but shall
not have the power to vote.
2. No faculty, staff, and/or administrator shall be considered ex-officio.
c. Advisors
1. At least one representative from the OSRR shall maintain an advisory role
in the Committee and shall advise the members of the Committee as well
as any student in attendance.
2. Staff members with expertise regarding particular sections of the Golden
Rule should make themselves available to advise the members upon the
Committee’s request.
d. Notification
The existence of the committee shall be publicized to the student body.
1. At the beginning of each semester, a message shall be sent through
appropriate distribution channels inviting all students to attend committee
meetings.
2. The committee shall maintain a webpage which shall contain information
on the meeting times, location, proposals under review and voting records
and which shall be clearly linked from the online version of the Golden
Rule and Responsibilities. The proposal shall then be sent to all members
of the Committee via e-mail within 48 hours of receiving the proposal.
e. Powers of the Proposal Process
1. The Committee shall recommend changes to the Golden Rule to the
appropriate administrative body.
2. Any student may make a proposal to the Committee.
5 | Page
3. All proposals made by faculty, staff, administration, or members of the
committee shall be submitted to the representative for Student Rights and
Responsibilities.
4. All proposals which are approved by a majority vote of the student
members of the committee shall be submitted by the committee in writing
to the Vice President for Student Development and Enrollment Services or
designee.
(i) The Vice President for Student Development and Enrollment
Services or designee shall notify the committee in writing of the
decision regarding the proposal.
(ii) If the Vice President for Student Development and Enrollment
Services or designee chooses not to incorporate the proposal into
the Golden Rule, he/she shall outline the reasons for choosing not
to do so in memorandum.
5. When reviewing sections of the Golden Rule for which the content is
mandated by another University document, the Committee may propose
changes to sections in such a document which are reflected in the Golden
Rule through the appropriate administrative channels.
f. Presence
1. The Committee shall meet at least once each month during the fall and
spring semesters
(i) All members of the committee shall be notified of the time and
place of each meeting.
(ii) The Committee shall propose no changes to this section of the
Golden Rule which can be construed to eliminate the mandate for
the Committee to exist.
2. Quorum shall be defined as the presiding officer, being the Chair or Vice
Chair, and at least two additional voting members of the committee.
g. Attendance Policy
At the first meeting of each semester, the committee shall establish its own
attendance policy.
h. Transition Policy
At the conclusion of the Spring Semester, the Chair of the Golden Rule Review
Committee, or designee, shall create a transition packet for the subsequent Chair.
1. The transition packet shall be provided to the current Golden Rule Review
Committee Advisor in both electronic and hard copy form. It is the
responsibility of the Advisor to provide this packet to the new Chair upon
selection.
2. The transition information should include the following:
(i) Leadership Positions of the current committee
(ii) Accomplishments
(iii) Recommendations
(iv) Attendance Policy
(v) Sample Meeting Agenda and Minutes
6 | Page
UCF-5.006 Student Rights and Responsibilities
(1) Student Rights. Upon enrollment, students are entitled to the following freedoms and
rights, provided the exercise thereof is accomplished in accordance with University procedures
and does not result in disruption or disturbance as elsewhere described in the Regulations.
(a) Participation in Student Government and its elective process.
(b) Membership in Registered Student Organizations.
(c) Freedom of expression. The basic freedoms of students to hear, write, distribute,
and act upon a variety of thoughts and beliefs are guaranteed. Freedom of
expression carries with it the responsibility for seeing that the essential order of
the University is preserved.
(d) Freedom to hold public forums. The University desires to create a spirit of free
inquiry and to promote the timely discussion of a wide variety of issues, provided
the views expressed are stated openly and are subject to critical evaluation.
Restraints on free inquiry are held to a minimum and are consistent with
preserving an organized society in which peaceful, democratic means for change
are available. Guest lecturers or off-campus speakers sponsored by student groups
may appear on the UCF campus following arrangements with the designated
University authority for such appearances.
(e) Freedom to hear, write, distribute, and act upon a variety of thoughts and beliefs.
This freedom is subject to the following:
1. Written materials identified by authorship and sponsorship may be sold or
distributed on campus within the guidelines of propriety and responsible
journalism. The distribution of such material, as is arranged by the
Director of Office of Student Involvement, is permissible for registered
student organizations provided steps have been taken to preserve the
orderliness of the campus.
2. Solicitation, whether printed materials or otherwise, on campus is
prohibited except as provided in University Regulation UCF-4.010.
3. The distribution of materials or circulation of petitions to captive
audiences such as those in classrooms, at registration, in study areas or in
residential units is not allowed without prior permission. Such permission
may be requested from the appropriate university official.
(f) Peaceful assembly. Student gatherings must neither disrupt or interfere with the
orderly operation of the institution, nor violate federal, state, or local laws, or
University policies and regulations.
(g) Fair and impartial proceeding. These matters shall include, but not be limited to:
1. Disciplinary proceedings involving an alleged violation of academic and
nonacademic rules.
2. Refunds and charges. The status of a student charged with a violation of
University rules shall not be affected pending final disposition of the
charges except in the case of administrative action (also known as an
interim action). For specific procedures and rights of students during the
Student Conduct Review Process, see later section entitled “Student
Conduct Review Process.”
(h) Confidentiality of student records. Each University office and agency which
generates, collects, and disseminates information on students must follow the
7 | Page
guidelines for confidentiality of those records in their possession. For further
information see “Student Record Guidelines.”
(i) Students with disabilities may be entitled to accommodations. For those students,
please contact Student Accessibility Services.
(2) Student Responsibilities. A student at the University is deemed to have given their consent
to the policies of the University and the Florida Board of Governors and to the laws of the State
of Florida. Each student is responsible for reviewing the rules and regulations of the University
and for abiding by them.
(3) Definitions.
(a) The term “Academic Misconduct Panel” is comprised of one faculty and one
staff/faculty member and two students selected from the Student Conduct Board.
(b) The term “Advisor” or “Support Person” refers to any individual who provides
support, guidance or advice to a party involved in a Student Conduct Review
Process and includes advocates and/or legal representatives. The Advisor or
Support Person of the involved party’s choice may assist and/or accompany the
party throughout the Student Conduct Review Process. This person may be
present to advise the party involved in a Student Conduct Review Process and
may participate in all aspects of the proceeding, but shall not testify for the party.
The Advisor or Support Person may not serve in any other role, including as a
witness, an investigator, decider of fact, hearing officer, or member of a
committee or panel convened to hear or decide the charge or any appeal. The term
“Advisor” does not include an advisor as defined under 34 CFR 106.45; refer to
University Policy 2-012 for information about “Advisor” under the University’s
Title IX Grievance Policy.
(c) The term “Class Lecture” is defined as a formal or methodical oral presentation as
part of a university course intended to present information or teach enrolled
students about a particular subject. A class lecture will occur most often in a
course identified by the university as a lecture type course, whether online or in-
person, as opposed to a lab course or a course section identified as a discussion
section. “Class lecture” does not include lab sessions, student presentations
(whether individually or as part of a group), class discussion (except when
incidental to and incorporated within a class lecture), clinical presentations such
as patient history, academic exercises involving student participation, test or
examination administrations, field trips, and private conversations between
students in the class or between a student and the faculty member during a class
session.
(d) The term “Clery Act” refers to the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security
Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act. The Clery Act is a federal law that
requires institutions of higher education to provide current and prospective
students and employees, the public, and the federal government with crime
statistics and information about campus crime prevention programs and policies.
Among other crimes, the Clery Act requires that colleges and universities report
forcible sex offenses including sexual assault and rape. The Clery Act was
amended by the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013.
(e) The term “Community ReEngagement and Educational Development (CREED)
Program” is a committee composed of an equal number of faculty/staff and
students appointed by the Director of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity
8 | Page
(SCAI) or designee to review the disciplinary status of a student, or the removal
of a “Z Designation” on a student’s transcript.
(f) The term “Complainant” refers to anyone who discloses having been subjected to
any act prohibited by the Rules of Conduct section UCF-5.008(5), the Rules of
Conduct section UCF-5.008(6), or the Organizational Rules of Conduct section
UCF-5.012(5), regardless of whether that person makes a report or seeks action
under that policy.
(g) The term “Consent” means an understandable exchange of affirmative words or
actions, which indicate a willingness to participate in mutually agreed upon sexual
activity. Consent cannot be obtained by force, threat, coercion, manipulation,
reasonable fear of injury, intimidation, use of position of influence, or through the
use of one’s mental or physical helplessness or incapacity. The lack of a negative
response, lack of protest or resistance, silence and passivity are not consent.
Consent to one form of sexual activity does not imply consent to other forms of
sexual activity. Past consent to sexual activity does not imply ongoing future
consent.
1. Responsibilities - It is the responsibility of the initiator to obtain clear and
affirmative responses at each stage of sexual involvement.
2. Standard - A determination of whether consent exists will be based on the
information the initiator of the sexual act knew or should have known as a
sober, reasonable person. Being impaired by alcohol or other drugs does
not relieve an initiator of a sexual act from obtaining consent.
3. Incapacitation Incapacitation is a state where an individual cannot make
rational, reasonable decisions because of age, mental or physical
helplessness, sleep, unconsciousness, or lack of awareness that sexual
activity is taking place. A person may be incapacitated due to the
consumption of alcohol or other drugs, or due to a temporary or permanent
physical or mental health condition. A person who is incapacitated lacks
the capacity to give consent because they cannot understand the facts,
nature, or extent of the sexual interaction.
4. Duration of Consent - Consent must be ongoing throughout sexual
activity, for each sexual act, and can be withdrawn at any time.
5. Within each sexual encounter, there may be separate individual sexual acts
involved. Consent to one act by itself does not constitute consent to
another act. If verbal consent is not given, ongoing active participation is
required for consent.
6. The existence of a dating or sexual relationship between the persons
involved, or the fact of past sexual relations have occurred between the
parties, is not an indicator of consent for any current or future sexual
encounter.
7. An individual who seeks to withdraw consent must communicate, through
clear words or actions, a decision to cease the sexual activity. Once
consent is withdrawn, the sexual activity must cease immediately.
8. Scope of Consent - Consent to engage in sexual activity with one person
does not imply consent to engage in sexual activity with another.
(h) The term “Continuously Enrolled” is defined as being enrolled in classes without
a break of two or more consecutive regular semesters/terms (i.e., Fall and Spring,
or Spring, Summer, and Fall).
9 | Page
(i) The term "Deputy Title IX Coordinator" is defined as a university employee who
is responsible for assisting with the coordination of the University’s efforts to
comply with and carry out its responsibilities under Title IX. UCF’s Deputy Title
IX Coordinators are Dana Juntunen, Brandi Stuart, and Abigail Malick.
(j) The term “Director of SCAI” refers to the Director of Student Conduct and
Academic Integrity.
(k) The term “Hold” refers to a negative service indicator placed on a student’s
record that includes but is not limited to: prevent modification to registration;
access to transcripts; and re-enrollment following a separation from the
University.
(l) The term “Mandated Assessment” refers to a process which is used to evaluate
the student’s risk of harm to self or others, and to take appropriate actions to
ensure the safety of the student or others if risk is present, completed by a licensed
mental health professional or other appropriate licensed medical provider.
(m) The term “Off Campus” refers to any location not defined as University premises.
(n) The term “Overlay” refers to a notification on a student’s university transcript that
states the student is not in good standing.
(o) The term "Possession" means having actual knowledge of a substance or property,
and intentionally exercising control over that substance or property.
(p) The term “Preponderance of Evidence” means that evidence, considered as a
whole, shows that the fact sought to be proved is more probable than not. This is
the standard used in adjudicating all disciplinary cases within the Student and
Organizational Conduct Review Process.
(q) The term “Publish” means to share, transmit, circulate, distribute or otherwise
provide access to a recording, regardless of format or medium, to another person
(or other persons), including but not limited to another student in the class.
Additionally, a recording, or transcript of the recording, is published if it is posted
on or uploaded to, in whole or in part, any media platform, including but not
limited social media, book, magazine, newspaper, leaflet, picket signs, or any
mode of print.
(r) The term “Record Sealing” refers to when a student’s disciplinary record cannot
be examined except by a court order or designated officials.
(s) The term “Relevant Information” means information that has been shown to
directly support the position of a party throughout one of the University’s
investigative processes, including the Student and/or Organizational Conduct
Review Process.
(t) The term “Respondent” refers to any student or registered student organization
who has been accused of a violation of Rules of Conduct Section UCF-5.008(5),
Rules of Conduct Section UCF-5.008(6), and/or the Organizational Rules of
Conduct section UCF-5.012(5).
(u) The term “Responsible Employee” is defined as any employee, and Direct
Support Organization non-student employee, who is not a confidential employee
as defined in the University’s Prohibition of Discrimination, Harassment and
Related Interpersonal Violence Policy. Responsible Employees include (but are
not necessarily limited to) Faculty (full-time and part-time), Staff (full-time and
part-time), Resident Assistants, and graduate students with classroom
responsibilities. Responsible employees also include those employees identified
as Campus Security Authorities (CSAs). The University reserves the right to
10 | Page
designate other individuals involved in university-sponsored/related activities as
Responsible Employees on a case-by-case basis.
(v) The term “Sanction” refers to outcome(s) imposed on students and registered
student organizations found in violation of any Rules of Conduct or
Organizational Rules of Conduct.
(w) The term “Sex Discrimination” refers to any unlawful distinction, preference or
detriment to an individual that is based upon an individual’s sex that: (1) excludes
an individual from participation in; (2) denies the individual the benefits of; (3)
treats the individual differently with regards to; or (4) otherwise adversely affects
a term or condition of an individual’s employment, education, living environment,
or participation in a university program or activity. Sex discrimination includes
sexual assault/misconduct, sexual exploitation, relationship violence, stalking,
sexual or gender-based harassment, retaliation, or complicity.
(x) The term “Sexual Contact” means physical contact of a sexual nature between
individuals and includes but is not limited to: (i) touching, kissing, fondling
(whether over or under clothing) of an individual for the purpose of sexual
gratification; and/or (ii) contact, however slight, between the mouth, anus or sex
organ of one individual with either the anus or sex organ of another individual;
and/or (iii) contact, however slight, between the anus or sex organ of one
individual and any other object.
(y) The term “Student” means any person enrolled in one or more classes at the
University, either full time or part time, study abroad student, online students,
continuing education students, students pursuing undergraduate, graduate or
professional studies, either degree seeking or non-degree seeking. Persons who
withdraw after allegedly violating the Rules of Conduct, or who are not officially
enrolled for a particular academic term but who have a continuing relationship
with the University are also “students.” Individuals who have been accepted for
admission and have paid an enrollment deposit are considered “students” for
limited purposes (including the Student Conduct Review Process).
(z) The term “Student Conduct Board” refers to any person or persons authorized by
the Director of SCAI or designee to review information and recommend findings
regarding whether a student or registered student organization has violated the
Rules of Conduct or Organizational Rules of Conduct, and to recommend
sanctions that may be imposed, if applicable. Student Conduct Board members
shall be selected through an annual application and interview process, with the
exception of the justices from the Student Government Judicial Branch. All
members of the Student Conduct Board shall receive annual training from SCAI.
(aa) The term “Title IX” refers to the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972
which is a federal law that protects people from discrimination based on sex in
education programs or activities which receive Federal financial assistance. Title
IX states that: “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be
excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal
financial assistance”. Additionally, Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis
of pregnancy as well as Title IX sexual harassment (defined in UCF-5.006(7)).
(bb) The “Title IX Coordinator” is defined as a university employee who is responsible
for coordinating the University’s efforts to comply with and carry out its
responsibilities under Title IX. UCF’s Title IX Coordinator is Matt Ricke.
11 | Page
(cc) The term “University” means the University of Central Florida.
(dd) The term “University Community” refers, collectively and individually, to
students, University officials, Trustees, and all visitors, contractors, and guests to
the University or any of its campuses, facilities or events.
(ee) The term “University Official” includes any person employed by the University
(i.e., faculty, staff, administration, and residence hall staff) acting within the scope
of their job duties.
(ff) The term “University Premises” includes all land, buildings, facilities, and other
properties in the possession of or owned, used, controlled by the University, or its
direct support organizations.
(gg) The term “VAWA” refers to the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of
2013, which amended the Violence Against Women Act and the Clery Act to
provide new requirements for schools to prevent and respond to sexual violence,
relationship violence and stalking. Some of these requirements include providing
primary prevention education and awareness programs for all incoming students
and employees; collecting statistics on relationship violence and stalking, in
addition to current requirements to collect sexual assault statistics; issuing
Complainants a written notice of their rights; and adopting grievance policies that
are prompt, fair, and impartial as well as administered by trained officials.
(hh) The term “VP of SDES” refers to the Vice President of Student Development and
Enrollment Services.
(ii) The term “Witness” refers to any person who directly observed an incident or has
direct or indirect knowledge related to an incident.
(4) Smoking. While on UCF property, students will uphold the smoke-free campus policy
(http://smokefree.sdes.ucf.edu/) to ensure a healthy and clean environment for everyone.
Smoking of any kind is prohibited in all facilities and University premises.
(5) Medical Emergencies. The University of Central Florida highly encourages students and
Registered Student Organizations to call for medical assistance whenever an individual
experiences severe intoxication/impairment or serious injury after consuming alcohol and/or
drugs. Students and Registered Student Organizations may be reluctant to call for help for
themselves or others due to potential involvement from law enforcement officials or SCAI. Due
to the serious or life-threatening nature of these medical emergencies, the University of Central
Florida urges students to contact emergency medical services or the law enforcement officials if
alcohol-related and/or drug-related medical emergencies arise. The University’s primary goal is
to create a safe environment for its students. Procedures and expectations regarding these
incidents have been outlined in the section 5.007 for individuals of and 5.011 for Registered
Student Organizations.
(6) Student Conduct Procedures for Sex-Based Misconduct (Non-Title IX Sexual
Harassment).
(a) These procedures apply to alleged violations of UCF Regulation 5.008(5) and
5.012(5), but do not apply to 5.008(6) Title IX Sexual Harassment (see paragraph
(7) below).
(b) The University of Central Florida is committed to fostering an environment in
which all members of our campus community are safe, secure, and free from sex
discrimination, including sexual misconduct, stalking, and relationship violence,
listed and defined in the Rules of Conduct (UCF-5.008) and Organizational Rules
of Conduct (UCF-5.012).Our community expects that all interpersonal
relationships and interactions – especially those of an intimate nature be
12 | Page
grounded upon mutual respect and open communication. When learning of
conduct or behavior that may not meet these standards, community members are
expected take an active role in promoting the inherent dignity of all individuals.
For a more exhaustive list of the community’s rights and expectations as it relates
to Title IX Policy and Procedures, please reference University Policy 2-004.1
Prohibition of Discrimination, Harassment and Related Interpersonal Violence.
Allegations of Title IX Sexual Harassment (as defined in the University's Title IX
Grievance Policy, UCF Policy 2-012) are governed by paragraph (7) below.
(c) The university encourages any faculty, staff, student or non-student who thinks
that he or she has been subjected to sex discrimination or retaliation by another
student, member of the faculty or staff, or third party affiliated with the University
to immediately report the incident to the Office of Institutional Equity. Reports
may be filed at https://letsbeclear.ucf.edu.
(d) The University strives to promote the safety and well-being of all students and
employees. This information is applicable to students and employees regardless of
their sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
(e) Rights of the Complainant and the Respondent. Any individual (“Complainant”)
who discloses having been subjected to sex discrimination, including sexual
assault/misconduct, sexual exploitation, relationship violence, stalking, sexual or
gender-based harassment, retaliation, or complicity, and any individual or
registered student organization (“Respondent”) who has been accused of sex
discrimination, including sexual assault/misconduct, sexual exploitation,
relationship violence, stalking, sexual or gender-based harassment, retaliation, or
complicity, are afforded the following rights throughout the university’s
investigative process and the student conduct review process (except in cases
involving alleged Title IX Sexual Harassment as defined in the University’s Title
IX Grievance Policy, UCF Policy 2-012, see paragraph (7) below). These rights
provide a fair process for both parties. These rights are in addition to the rights
afforded in the student conduct review procedures outlined in University Policy 2-
004.1 Prohibition of Discrimination, Harassment and Related Interpersonal
Violence, and referenced in UCF-5.009 (students) and UCF-5.013 (student
organizations) of the University Regulations. Complainant and Respondent rights
include the following:
1. Both the Complainant and Respondent are permitted to have an advisor or
support person accompany them throughout the university’s investigative
process and student conduct review process. This person may be present
to advise the party involved in a student conduct review process and may
participate in all aspects of the proceeding but shall not testify for the
Complainant or Respondent. The advisor or support person may not serve
in any other role, including as a witness, an investigator, decider of fact,
hearing officer, or member of a committee or panel convened to hear or
decide the charge or any appeal.
2. Both the Complainant and the Respondent have the right to remedial and
protective measures and shall be notified of available assistance at the
University.
3. Both the Complainant and Respondent will have equal opportunity to
present relevant witnesses and other information during the investigative
process and during a formal hearing. Prior to the initiation of the student
13 | Page
conduct review process, the investigator has the discretion to determine
the relevance of any proffered evidence and to include or exclude certain
types of evidence. In general, the investigator will not consider statements
of personal opinion, rather than direct observations or reasonable inference
from the facts, or statements as to any party’s general reputation for any
character trait.
4. If the investigative process results in a recommendation to initiate the
student conduct review process, at least seven business (7) business days
before the formal hearing, the Respondent will receive timely written
notice of the charges in sufficient detail to prepare for the formal hearing
and the date, time, and location of the formal hearing. In addition to the
timely written notice, Complainant and Respondent will be required to
attend a preliminary conference meeting with SCAI and be informed of
the available resolution options in the student conduct review process.
5. Both the Complainant and Respondent have the right to an impartial
hearing officer. Prior to the commencement of the formal hearing, the
Complainant and Respondent shall have the opportunity to challenge the
impartiality of the hearing officer. If the Complainant or Respondent
shows good cause for the removal of the hearing officer, the Associate
Vice President and Dean of Students or designee will assign a new hearing
officer.
6. At least five (5) business days before the formal hearing, both the
Complainant and Respondent will be provided with all known information
in the University’s possession related to the allegations. This information
will include all known witnesses and all known information that is related
to the allegations, both inculpatory and exculpatory.
7. If the matter proceeds to a formal hearing, both the Complainant and
Respondent may submit a list of proposed questions related to the alleged
incident to be asked during the formal hearing. The relevancy of proposed
questions will be determined by the hearing officer. During a formal
hearing, all questions shall be asked through the hearing officer. Both
Complainant and Respondent should not be questioned directly by one
another nor by either’s advisor; instead, questions for each shall be asked
by the hearing officer based on proposed questions submitted by the other
party.
8. Both the Complainant and Respondent will have equal opportunity to
present relevant witnesses and other information during the investigative
process. Such evidence, as deemed relevant to the investigation and used
in authoring the investigative findings report, shall be presented during the
student conduct review process. Relevancy and timeliness will be
determined by the investigator(s). All evidence and witnesses must be
submitted by the Complainant and Respondent no later than the
conclusion of the investigative findings report review period prior to the
report being sent to OSRR. If OSRR determines that there is “cause,” then
OSRR will make a written recommendation, including a copy of OIE’s
investigative report and all other supporting information, to SCAI. A
finding of “cause” at this stage is not a finding of a violation. SCAI will
charge the student and/or registered student organization through the
14 | Page
Student Conduct Review Process when there is evidence of facts which
reasonably allow the university to conclude that a violation of 5.008(5) or
5.012(5) may have occurred.
9. Both the Complainant and Respondent will have equal opportunity to
present relevant witnesses and other information during a formal hearing
review process. Neither the Complainant nor Respondent will have
irrelevant past conduct, including sexual history, discussed during the
formal hearing. The issue of relevancy shall be determined by the hearing
officer.
10. Both the Complainant and the Respondent will be provided access to
participate, during the entire formal hearing in person, via
videoconference, by telephone, or by other means available.
11. At least five (5) business days before the formal hearing, the Complainant
may submit a written statement describing the impact of the Prohibited
Conduct on the Complainant and expressing a preference about the
sanction(s) to be imposed. At least five (5) business days before the formal
hearing, the Respondent may submit a written statement explaining any
factors that the Respondent believes should mitigate or otherwise be
considered in determining the sanction(s) imposed. SCAI will ensure that
the Complainant and the Respondent each have an opportunity to review
any statement submitted by the other party before the start of the formal
hearing. The purpose of the statement(s) is to assist the hearing officer in
proposing a sanction. Therefore, the statement(s) will be given to the
hearing body for consideration only if the hearing officer makes a
proposed finding of in violation on one or more allegations of sex-based
misconduct (other than Title IX sexual harassment) addressed in the
formal hearing.
12. Both the Complainant and Respondent will be informed, concurrently and
in writing, of the outcome of the investigative process, the Student
Conduct Review Process, and the outcome of the appeal process.
13. Both the Complainant and the Respondent have the right to appeal the
outcome of the Student Conduct Review Process on the basis outlined in
the applicable Student Conduct Appeals section UCF-5.010 (individual
student) or UCF-5.013 (registered student organizations).
14. Both the Complainant and Respondent will be given periodic status
updates throughout the investigative process and the Student Conduct
Review Process.
(f) Administrative hearing officers who hear cases of sex-based misconduct (other
than Title IX sexual harassment) receive annual training on how to conduct fair
and impartial hearings for these types of cases.
(7) Title IX Sexual Harassment Procedures for Student Conduct Review Process.
(a) Federal law, specifically Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title
IX), prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or
activities. Part of Title IX’s prohibition regarding sex discrimination includes acts
of Title IX Sexual Harassment as defined in the University’s Title IX Grievance
Policy, UCF Policy 2-012. Title IX also prohibits retaliation for making a good
faith report of Title IX Sexual Harassment or participating in or being a party to
any proceeding involving allegations of Title IX Sexual Harassment.
15 | Page
(b) Rights of the Complainant and the Respondent. The rights of the Complainant and
Respondent in a Title IX Sexual Harassment matter are explained in the
University’s Title IX Grievance Policy, UCF Policy 2-012.
(c) Procedures Governing Title IX Sexual Harassment Allegations. The policy and
procedures which govern the investigation and live hearing process for allegations
of Title IX Sexual Harassment are found in the University’s Title IX Grievance
Policy, UCF Policy 2-012.
(d) Administrative hearing officers who hear cases of Title IX Sexual Harassment
receive annual training on how to conduct fair and impartial hearings for these
types of cases.
16 | Page
UCF-5.0065 Involuntary Withdrawal Procedures; Mandated
Assessment
(1) Involuntary Withdrawal Procedure.
(a) Introduction.
1. The University of Central Florida is committed to ensuring equality of
educational opportunity while cultivating an environment that is safe for
the campus community and supportive of student learning. The University
will seek to intervene where a student’s behavior interferes with the rights
of others within the University community or where the student presents a
significant risk of harm to the health, safety, well-being and/or property
rights of others. In such situations, safety and security concerns are
paramount, and the University must react as promptly as feasible under the
circumstances. University officials may consider a number of reasonable
security and health and safety measures, including, but not limited to,
requesting emergency assistance and seeking psychiatric evaluation,
hospitalization, and treatment for mental illness as appropriate under the
law. Additionally, the University may determine that it is necessary for
the student to be involuntarily withdrawn from the University for the
protection of others. This section outlines the procedures to be used by the
University in making an involuntary withdrawal decision.
2. This involuntary Withdrawal Procedure will be applied in a
nondiscriminatory manner, and decisions will be based on consideration of
the student’s conduct, actions, and statements and not on knowledge or
belief that the student has a disability.
3. The purpose of the Involuntary Withdrawal Procedure is for the University
to be able to take urgent action when circumstances present a Significant
Risk based on reasonably available information at the time. It will be
necessary for the University to act promptly and for the benefit of the
community as a whole, even if that means that, in consideration of later-
presented information, the procedure ultimately concludes in favor of the
student’s continued enrollment (with or without conditions). Where the
involuntary withdrawal procedure is invoked but the student is permitted
to continue enrollment with no conditions, the University will take
reasonable steps to assist the student in resuming their academic endeavors
with as little disruption as feasible under the circumstances.
(b) Direct Threat. When a student’s behavior is deemed to pose a direct threat risk to
the health and safety of the community, the Associate Vice President and Dean of
Students (“Dean of Students”) or their designee may initiate an involuntary
withdrawal of the student on behalf of the university. The Dean of Students or
designee will consult with the University Crisis Team before a final decision is
made on the involuntary withdrawal of the student. A student poses a Direct
Threat when the student’s behavior poses a “Significant Risk” to the health or
safety of the student or others, or of significant property damage, or of substantial
disruption to the lawful activities of others or the educational process or orderly
operation of the University, and reasonable modifications of policies, practices, or
procedures will not sufficiently mitigate the risk. Significant Risk is defined as
17 | Page
the high probability of harm, threats of harm, or disruption and not just a slightly
increased, speculative, or remote risk of such. Significant Risk is identified based
on information that is reasonably available at the time of consideration.
Information may be provided to the University through different means, including
an incident report to Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities (OSRR), a
police report, information provided following a hospitalization, or any other
reliable source.
(c) Interim Involuntary Withdrawal.
1. A student may be involuntarily withdrawn from the University on an
interim basis (“Interim Involuntary Withdrawal”) if the Assistant Dean of
Students or designee determines, based upon information reasonably
available at the time, that the student poses a Direct Threat as defined
above. A student will remain on Interim Involuntary Withdrawal pending
the outcome of the Interim Involuntary Withdrawal Review. An Interim
Involuntary Withdrawal may be imposed prior to a meeting of the
University Crisis Team.
2. A student will be notified of Interim Involuntary Withdrawal through a
written notice outlining the Interim Involuntary Withdrawal procedure,
including the time, date, and location of the Interim Involuntary
Withdrawal Review.
3. A student under Interim Involuntary Withdrawal shall be given an
opportunity to present information to the University Crisis Team within
three (3) business days from the effective date of the Interim Involuntary
Withdrawal, to review the following issues only:
a. The reliability of the information concerning the student’s behavior
and,
b. Whether or not the student’s behavior poses a Direct Threat, as
defined above.
4. Should the student fail to attend the Interim Involuntary Withdrawal
review, the review may be held in the student’s absence, and any
recommended actions will be made using the information available at the
time of the scheduled review.
5. If upon conclusion of the Interim Involuntary Withdrawal review, the
University Crisis Team determines the student will remain on Interim
Involuntary Withdrawal based on the above defined issues, the University
Crisis Team will proceed with the Involuntary Withdrawal procedures as
outlined below.
(d) Involuntary Withdrawal – Notice to Student. A student subject to Involuntary
Withdrawal is entitled to the following:
1. Notice of intent to remove the student pursuant to this policy stating the
reasons for the proposed action.
2. The opportunity to examine the psychiatric or other evaluations provided
to the University Crisis Team and to discuss them.
3. The opportunity to present relevant information for consideration of their
case personally, or by a licensed mental health professional working with
that student, if the student is not capable of self-representation.
4. The opportunity to have an advisor of the student’s own choice
accompany the student to any meetings or proceedings described in this
18 | Page
procedure. The advisor may not present on behalf of the student or
otherwise participate in the meeting or proceeding.
5. The right to appeal.
(e) Involuntary Withdrawal – Meeting of the University Crisis Team. The Assistant
Dean of Students or designee will call a meeting of the University Crisis Team no
earlier than five (5) business days after notifying the student of the proposed
Involuntary Withdrawal. The student will be notified of the time, date, and
location of the University Crisis Team meeting. The student may be present at
this meeting and may present information in support of themselves. Following the
student’s presentation, the team shall meet in a confidential deliberation. At the
conclusion of this confidential deliberation, the team shall make a
recommendation to the Dean of Students or designee, based upon the Team’s
review of all available information at the time of the meeting, as to whether the
University should:
1. involuntary withdraw the student due to Direct Threat;
2. make no changes to the student’s status;
3. allow continued enrollment with conditions; or
4. if the student is on Interim Involuntary Withdrawal at the time, reinstate
the student with or without conditions.
(f) Involuntary Withdrawal – Notifying Student of Recommendation and Decision.
The Dean of Students or designee will make a final decision regarding the
student’s enrollment status based on the totality of information available to the
University and considering both the University Crisis Team’s recommendation
and any information presented by the student. The Dean of Students or designee
will notify the student in writing within two business days of the final decision
regarding the student’s enrollment status.
(g) Involuntary Withdrawal Appeal – In the event a student disagrees with the
decision of the Dean of Students or designee, the student may appeal the decision.
The appeal must be made in writing to the Vice President for SDES, or designee,
within three (3) business days after the date of the notification to the student of
the decision. A student may appeal the decision based on one or more of the
following criteria:
1. Irregularities in fairness and stated procedures that could have affected the
outcome of the decision.
2. Discovery of new and significant information that could have affected the
outcome and that was not known or could not reasonably have been
discovered and/or presented at the time of the meeting.
3. The outcome is extraordinarily disproportionate to the reported behavior.
The Vice President of SDES or designee, shall, within three (3) business days,
sustain the initial decision or return the case to the University Crisis Team for re-
consideration. Should the appellate officer require additional time for review
beyond the three (3) business days, the appellate officer shall notify the student in
writing of the need for additional time. The Vice President’s decision to sustain
the initial decision is final action. If the matter is returned for re-consideration,
the process will resume at the step outlined in subsection (e), above.
(h) Upon being involuntarily withdrawn, the student may no longer enroll in classes,
may not be an active member of a registered student organization, may no longer
use University facilities, must vacate University owned housing, may no longer
19 | Page
be permitted on University property, and may not be employed by UCF.
Additionally, an involuntarily withdrawn student may be entitled to whatever
refunds of tuition, fees, and room and board charges as would be appropriate
given the timing of the withdrawal.
(i) Students who are involuntarily withdrawn from the University shall have a hold
placed on their records, which will prevent them from being readmitted or
reenrolled at the institution except as stated in this paragraph. A student may
request readmission or reenrollment at the University and provide the Dean or
Students or designee with documentation from an appropriate healthcare provider
of their choice who has conducted a proper assessment of the student and
concluded that the student is ready and able to safely return to the University and
does not pose a Direct Threat as defined above. In cases where the Dean of
Students or designee has imposed other conditions for readmission, it is the
responsibility of the student to provide documentation of compliance with such
conditions.
(j) A student who is considered for but ultimately not subject to Involuntary
Withdrawal may be subject to conditions on continued enrollment at the
University. In such cases, the student will be provided with a written summary of
any such conditions and must meet all conditions in order to maintain student
status. A student who fails to meet such conditions may be later subject to
involuntary withdrawal by the Dean of Students or designee or may be subject to
charges through the University’s Student Conduct Review Process for failure to
comply.
(k) The current voluntary medical withdrawal process should not be used to handle
withdrawals where a Direct Threat is evident or where a violation of the Rules of
Conduct has allegedly occurred. Information for students seeking a medical
withdrawal is available in the Catalog.
(l) As a general principle, the University prefers to use the Student Conduct Review
Process in instances of misconduct, without regard to whether the student has a
physical or mental condition that might be contributing to the misconduct. The
Involuntary Withdrawal Procedure is to be employed in those situations in which
the regular Student Conduct Review Process is not applicable or, due to safety
concerns, cannot be applied in a sufficiently timely fashion.
(2) Mandated Assessment Procedure. This University procedure is established to respond to
behaviors or actions that result in hospitalization from imminent danger to self or others via the
Baker Act (F.S. 394.463) or Marchman Act (Chapter 397, Florida Statutes), significant acts or
threats of violence to others, chronic eating disorders, dramatic and/or expansive displays of self-
mutilation, behaviors that are significantly disruptive to the UCF community and /or diminish the
ability of a student to care for oneself. Whenever the UCF Police provide transportation of a
UCF student to the hospital for involuntary examination, the police will file a report with the
OSRR. In addition, anyone may also file reports about students of concern with Student Care
Services.
(a) Once a report is received regarding a UCF student hospitalization via the Baker
Act or the Marchman Act, Student Care Services may utilize the mandated
assessment session(s) to evaluate a student’s risk of harm to self or others, and to
take appropriate actions to ensure the safety of the student or others if risk is
present. In addition, the mandated assessment session(s) are designed to assist
20 | Page
students in developing a safety and/or well-being plan and provide students with
educational resources. A member of Student Care Services will contact the
student in a timely manner and require an initial meeting between a Student Care
Services staff member and the student to inform the student of their rights and
responsibilities regarding the incident.
(b) All students identified as threatening self-harm or having attempted suicide must
complete a mandated assessment with a licensed mental health professional
and/or a physical assessment with a licensed medical provider. Examples of a
licensed mental health professional include a Student Health Services psychiatrist,
a Counseling and Psychological Services clinician, or a community based
licensed mental health professional or licensed psychiatrist of the student’s
choice. Student Care Services will require proof of participation for the mandated
assessment with a licensed mental health professional and/or proof of a physical
assessment with an appropriate medical provider. The student must meet with
Student Care Services within ten (10) business days following release to complete
a follow up appointment. Student must provide proof of assessment within twenty
(20) business days following release or prior to return to the University (in the
event a student withdraws for the remainder of the semester or is placed on
Medical Withdrawal). Failure to comply may result in disciplinary action or the
convening of the University Crisis Team.
(c) In cases where more protective action is needed based on more severe
behavior/conduct (e.g., behavior endangering others, threats to harm others,
behavior significantly disruptive to the UCF community), the Assistant Dean of
Students or designee may initiate one or both of the following:
1. Interim Suspension followed by initiating the Student Conduct Review
Process;
2. Convening of the University Crisis Team to consider the initiation of the Involuntary
Withdrawal Procedure.
21 | Page
UCF-5.007 Student Conduct and Academic Integrity; Scope;
Student Conduct Records; Medical Emergencies (Alcohol & Drug)
(1) Scope
(a) The Rules of Conduct shall apply to all undergraduate students, graduate students
and students pursuing professional studies, including those attending its regional
campuses and/or off campus instructional sites. The Rules of Conduct shall be
deemed a part of the terms and conditions of admission and enrollment of all
students. The right of all students to seek knowledge, debate ideas, form opinions,
and freely express their ideas is fully recognized by the University of Central
Florida. The Rules of Conduct apply to student conduct and will not be used to
impose discipline for the lawful expression of ideas. Specific restrictions on time
and place of meetings and assemblies are found in other University regulations or
policies.
(b) These Rules of Conduct apply to all student conduct that occurs on University
premises or online, or at activities officially approved by the University of Central
Florida or which are sponsored or conducted by University groups and
organizations, regardless of location.
(c) Off-Campus Conduct. The University may take action against a student for off-
campus conduct if the conduct is specifically prohibited by law or the Rules of
Conduct; or if the conduct poses (or demonstrates that the student’s continued
presence on University premises poses) a danger to the health, safety or welfare of
the University community; or if the conduct is disruptive to the orderly processes
and functions of the University.
(d) Failure to comply with duly established laws or University regulations may subject
violator(s) to appropriate civil authorities.
(2) Authority
(a) Florida Board of Governors Regulation 6.0105 requires each university to establish
a Student Disciplinary System, including a code of conduct, to apply to student
disciplinary proceedings.
(b) These regulations are designed to ensure fairness and due process in student
disciplinary proceedings.
(c) Generally, authority necessary to enforce the student conduct regulations is vested
in the Vice President for Student Development and Enrollment Services or
designee. Selected functions of this authority are shared with faculty, staff and
students. Some functions of student conduct administration are assisted through
review boards or committees.
(3) Violations of Law and Rule of Conduct Violations. A student who commits offenses
against the laws of municipalities, states, or the United States, is subject to prosecution by those
authorities and may be subject to disciplinary action under University rules when the conduct
violates institutional standards. Student shall not be forced to present self-incriminating
evidence; however, the University is not required to postpone disciplinary proceedings pending
the outcome of any civil or criminal case. The Student Conduct Review Process is not a criminal
or judicial proceeding and is designed to address student behavior; therefore, alleged violations
of the Rules of Conduct will be addressed independently of any penalty imposed by the courts
for the criminal offense.
22 | Page
(4) Student Conduct Records
(a) Maintenance of Records. A student’s conduct case record will be maintained in
Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) and, if applicable, the Office of
Institutional Equity. The case record of a student found responsible for charge(s)
against them, with sanctions less than disciplinary suspension, dismissal and/or
expulsion, will generally be maintained in SCAI (and, if applicable, the Office of
Institutional Equity) for seven years from the calendar year of record, after which
they are destroyed. The case record of a student who has been placed on
disciplinary suspension, dismissal and/or expulsion will be permanently maintained
as official records by SCAI.
(b) Release of Records. The release of student disciplinary records will be governed
by applicable federal and state laws regarding the privacy of educational records.
(c) Sealing of Records: For information regarding sealing of records, please see UCF-
5.010(4).
(5) Evaluation of Student Conduct Review Process. The Student Conduct Review Process
will be evaluated periodically by the Golden Rule Review Committee. All proposed changes
shall be evaluated for approval by the appropriate administrative body.
(6) Medical Emergencies. The University of Central Florida highly encourages students to call
for medical assistance whenever an individual experiences severe intoxication or serious injury
after consuming alcohol and/or other drugs. Students may be reluctant to call for help for
themselves or others due to potential involvement from law enforcement officials or SCAI. Due
to the serious or life-threatening nature of these medical emergencies, the University of Central
Florida urges students to contact emergency medical services or law enforcement officials if
alcohol-related and/or drug-related medical emergencies arise. The University’s primary goal is
to create a safe environment for its students.
(a) University of Central Florida students who receive medical attention due to drug
and/or alcohol related emergencies may be exempted from disciplinary action by
the Director of SCAI following the Director’s review of the circumstances.
Students exempted by the Director from disciplinary action in this manner will be
referred for assessment and follow-up services in lieu of the student conduct review
process.
(b) Students who receive medical assistance for drugs and/or alcohol emergencies may
receive exemption for violations of the Rules of Conduct Section 11(a)-11(d)
and/or 12(a)-12(c); however, exemption for other Rules of Conduct violations may
not be granted. The Director of SCAI or designee reserves the right to review each
incident individually to determine whether the student will be exempt from
disciplinary action. The Director of SCAI or designee maintains the right to
recommend additional requirements for students who are referred for assessment
and fail to meet the requirements of their assessment. For subsequent incidents,
appropriate interventions will be handled on a case by case basis.
(c) Students who seek medical assistance on behalf of another student impaired by
drugs and/or alcohol may be exempted by the Director of SCAI from disciplinary
action for violations of the Rules of Conduct Section 11(a)-11(d) and/or 12(a)-
12(c). However, exemption for other violations of the Rules of Conduct will not be
granted.
23 | Page
(d) For parental notification regarding alcohol and/or other drug-related incidents, refer
to the Parental Notification Policy on SCAI website:
https://scai.sdes.ucf.edu/parental-notification/.
(e) Additional information regarding alcohol and/or other drug-related emergencies can
be found on the SCAI website at https://scai.sdes.ucf.edu/medicalemergencies/.
24 | Page
UCF-5.008 Rules of Conduct
The following defined and described actions include, but are not limited to, conduct for which
disciplinary action may be taken at the University of Central Florida. Students are responsible
for the observation of all University policies and regulations. Each student is expected to abide
by these rules of conduct, and administrators are expected to enforce them. These Rules of
Conduct should be read broadly and are not designed to define prohibited conduct in exhaustive
terms. Additional rules and regulations may be revised during the year; announcements will be
made on adoption of the changes or additions. The right of all students to seek knowledge,
debate ideas, form opinions, and freely express their ideas is fully recognized by the University
of Central Florida. The Rules of Conduct apply to student conduct and will not be used to impose
discipline for the lawful expression of ideas. Students are prohibited from engaging in:
(1) Academic Misconduct
(a) Unauthorized assistance: Using or attempting to use unauthorized materials,
information or study aids in any academic exercise unless specifically authorized
by the instructor of record. The unauthorized possession of examination or course
related material also constitutes cheating.
(b) Communication to another through written, visual, electronic, or oral means. The
presentation of material which has not been studied or learned, but rather was
obtained through someone else’s efforts and used as part of an examination,
course assignment or project.
(c) Commercial Use of Academic Material: Selling of course material to another
person and/or uploading course material to a third-party vendor without
authorization or without the express written permission of the University and the
Instructor. Course materials include but are not limited to class notes, Instructor’s
power points, tests, quizzes, labs, instruction sheets, homework, study guides, and
handouts.
(d) Falsifying or misrepresenting the student’s own academic work.
(e) Plagiarism: Whereby another’s work is used or appropriated without any
indication of the source, thereby attempting to convey the impression that such
work is the student’s own.
(f) Multiple Submissions: Submitting the same academic work for credit more than
once without the express written permission of the instructor.
(g) Any student who knowingly helps another violate academic behavior standards is
also in violation of the standards.
(h) Soliciting assistance with academic coursework and/or degree requirements. The
solicitation of assistance with an assignment, lab, quiz, test, paper, etc., without
authorization of the instructor of record or designee is prohibited. This includes
but is not limited to asking for answers to a quiz, trading answers, or offering to
pay another to complete an assignment. It is considered Academic Misconduct to
solicit assistance with academic coursework and/or degree requirements, even if
the solicitation did not yield actual assistance (for example, if there was no
response to the solicitation).
25 | Page
(2) Possessing and/or Providing False and Misleading Information and/or Falsification of
University Records
(a) Withholding related information or furnishing false or misleading information
(oral or written) to University officials (faculty or staff) or law enforcement
officers.
(b) Possession, use or attempted use of any form of fraudulent identification,
including the credentials or identification of another individual.
(c) Forgery, alteration, or misuse of any University document, material, file, record,
or instrument of identification.
(d) Deliberately and purposefully providing false or misleading verbal or written
information about another person.
(e) Falsification, distortion, or misrepresentation of information during an
investigation or the Student Conduct Review Process, including knowingly
initiating a false complaint.
(f) Fraud: Any act of deceit or misrepresentation for purposes of financial or personal
gain.
(3) Disruptive Conduct
(a) Any act that impairs, interferes with, or obstructs the orderly conduct, processes,
and functions of the University or any part thereof or the rights of one or more
individuals.
(b) Any act which deliberately impedes or interferes with the normal flow of
pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
(c) Any act which intentionally interferes with the election processes of any
University registered student organization or sponsored student group.
(d) Misuse of any University safety equipment, firefighting equipment, or fire alarms.
(e) A false report of an explosive or incendiary device, which constitutes a threat or
bomb scare.
(f) Breach of peace: an act, which aids, abets, or procures another person to breach
the peace on the University premises or at University sponsored/related functions.
(g) Failure to comply with oral or written instruction from duly authorized University
officials (i.e. faculty, staff, administration, residence hall staff) acting within the
scope of their job duties or law enforcement officers acting in the performance of
their duties, including failure to produce identification to these persons when
requested to do so.
(h) Failure to produce identification upon request by a University official (i.e. faculty,
staff, administration, residence hall staff), acting within the scope of their job
duties or law enforcement officers acting in the performance of their duties.
(i) Hindering, noncompliance, or interfering with the student conduct review process
by failing to obey the notice from a university official to appear for a student
conduct meeting or hearing; and/or attempting to discourage an individual’s
proper participating in, or use of, the student conduct review process.
(j) Violation of any other University regulation or policy as described in the UCF
Regulations, UCF Policies and Procedures, or University department publicized
policy.
(k) Failure to comply with applicable law and University regulations and procedures
for solicitation and fundraising activities on campus.
26 | Page
(4) Harmful Behavior
(a) Physical harm or threat of physical harm to any person. This harmful behavior
policy may not apply in those instances where it is found that a student is acting in
self-defense.
(b) Verbal, digital, or written abuse, threats, intimidation, coercion and/or other
conduct that endangers the health, safety, or wellbeing of others, or which would
place a reasonable person in fear of bodily injury or death. This definition,
however, shall not be interpreted to abridge the rights of the University
community to freedom of expression protected by the First Amendment of the
United States Constitution and any other applicable law.
(c) Discriminatory Harassment: Discriminatory harassment consists of verbal,
physical, electronic or other conduct based upon a protected class as defined in
University Policy 2-004, or membership in other protected classes set forth in
state or federal law that interferes with that individual’s educational or
employment opportunities, participation in a university program or activity, or
receipt of legitimately-requested services meeting the description of either Hostile
Environment Harassment or Quid Pro Quo Harassment, as defined in University
Policy 2-004.1 Prohibition of Discrimination, Harassment, and Related
Interpersonal Violence.
(d) Bullying: Defined as behavior of any sort (including communicative behavior)
directed at another, that is severe, pervasive, or persistent, and is of a nature that
would cause a reasonable person or group in the target’s position substantial
emotional distress and undermine their ability to work, study, or participate in
University life or regular activities, or which would place a reasonable person in
fear of injury or death.
(e) Stalking: Defined as behavior not of a sexual nature that is repeated and/or
unwanted toward or with another person that would cause a reasonable person to
fear for their safety or the safety of others, or to experience substantial emotional
distress. Such conduct is direct, indirect, or through a third party using any type of
action, method, or means. Cyber stalking is also included in this definition.
(f) Invasion of Privacy and Unauthorized Recording.
1. Making, using, disclosing or distributing a recording of a person in a
location or situation in which that person has a reasonable expectation of
privacy and is unaware of the recording or does not consent to it; and any
other conduct that constitutes an invasion of the privacy of another person
under applicable laws and regulations. Such conduct includes, without
limitation, unauthorized recording of personal conversations, images,
meetings or activities.
2. Unauthorized recording of class activity (other than class lecture), or of
meetings where there exists a legal expectation of privacy, and/or any
unauthorized publication of a recording.
3. Engaging in acts of voyeurism, including but not limited to peeping or
surreptitiously recording another when there is a reasonable expectation of
privacy.
4. Any notice, consent, or other requirements under applicable laws and
regulations must be fulfilled in connection with authorizing, making,
using, disclosing, or distributing any recording, where there is a legal
expectation of privacy.
27 | Page
(g) Retaliation against or harassment of complainant(s), other person(s) alleging
misconduct, or anyone who participates in an investigation.
(h) Condoning or encouraging acts of harmful behavior as defined above or failing to
intervene during an act of harmful behavior while it is occurring.
(5) Sex-Based Misconduct (Non-Title IX Sexual Harassment)
(a) Sexual Assault. Sexual assault means sexual contact without consent.
(b) Sexual Harassment. Sexual harassment means any unwelcome sexual advance,
request for sexual favors, or other unwanted conduct of a sexual nature, whether
verbal, non-verbal, graphic, physical, or otherwise, when the conditions for
Discriminatory Harassment as defined in UCF Policy 2-004 are present.
(c) Gender-Based Harassment: Gender-based harassment is discriminatory
harassment that is based on gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender
expression, which may include acts of aggression, intimidation, or hostility,
whether verbal or non-verbal, graphic, physical, or otherwise, even if the acts do
not involve conduct of a sexual nature, when the conditions for Discriminatory
Harassment as defined in UCF Policy 2-004 are present.
(d) Obscene or Indecent Behavior: Exposure of one’s body in such a manner that
another party reasonably could be offended or to display sexual behavior which
another person reasonably finds offensive.
(e) Voyeurism: Trespass, spying, or eavesdropping for the purpose of sexual
gratification.
(f) Solicitation of a Minor: soliciting sexual acts from a minor by oral, written, or
electronic means.
(g) Child Pornography: possessing, producing or the dissemination of child
pornography
(h) Relationship Violence: Relationship Violence includes any act of violence or
threatened act of violence that occurs between individuals who are involved or
have been involved in a sexual, dating, spousal, domestic, or other intimate
relationship. Relationship Violence may include sexual assault, stalking, and
physical assault. Relationship Violence may involve a pattern of behavior used to
establish power and control over another person through fear and intimidation or
may involve one-time conduct. A pattern of behavior is typically determined
based on the repeated use of words and/or actions and inactions in order to
demean, intimidate, and/or control another person. This behavior can be verbal,
emotional, and/or physical and may be directed towards the former partner, their
property, or other individuals. Examples of Relationship Violence may include,
but are not limited to: slapping; pulling hair; punching; damaging another
person’s property; driving recklessly to scare someone; name calling; humiliating
another person in public; harassment directed toward a current or former partner
or spouse; and/or threats of abuse, such as threatening to hit, harm, or use a
weapon on another (whether Complainant or acquaintance, friend, or family
member of the Complainant), or other forms of verbal threats.
(i) Stalking: Stalking under this provision occurs where a person engages in a course
of conduct of a sexual nature that is directed at a specific person under
circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to fear for the person’s safety
or the safety of others, or to experience substantial emotional distress. A “course
of conduct” is two or more acts, including but not limited to acts in which a
28 | Page
person directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by any action, method, device,
or means, follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, or communicates to or
about another person, or interferes with another person’s property. Stalking
includes “cyber-stalking,” a particular form of stalking in which a person uses
electronic media, such as the internet, social networks, blogs, phones, texts, or
other similar devices or forms of contact. Stalking may include, but is not limited
to: non-consensual communications (face to face, telephone, e-mail); threatening
or obscene gestures; surveillance/following/pursuit; showing up outside the
targeted individual’s classroom or workplace; sending gifts and/or notes
(romantic, bizarre, sinister, or perverted); and/or making threats.
(j) Sexual Exploitation: Sexual Exploitation is purposely or knowingly doing or
attempting to do any of the following:
1. Recording or photographing private sexual activity and/or a person’s
intimate parts (including genitalia, groin, breasts or buttocks) without
consent;
2. Disseminating or posting images of private sexual activity and/or a
person’s intimate parts (including genitalia, groin, breasts or buttocks)
without consent;
3. Allowing third parties to observe private sexual activity from a hidden
location (e.g., closet) or through electronic means (e.g., Skype or
livestreaming of images);
4. Subjecting another person to human trafficking; or
5. Exposing another person to a sexually transmitted infection or virus
without the other’s knowledge.
(k) Any attempted acts of sex-based misconduct are also violations of this policy.
(6) Title IX Sexual Harassment
(a) Title IX Sexual Harassment is defined as any conduct on the basis of sex which
occurs (i) on or after August 14, 2020; (ii) against a person located in the United
States; and (iii) in or as part of the University’s education program or activity,
which satisfies one or more of the following:
1. Unwelcome conduct that a reasonable person would determine is so
severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a
person equal access to the University’s education program or activity.
2. Sexual assault (as defined in the Clery Act), which includes any sexual
contact that occurs without consent (consent and sexual contact are
defined in UCF-5.006(3)).
3. Dating violence (as defined in the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA)
amendments to the Clery Act), which includes any act of violence or
threatened act of violence committed by a person: (A) who is or has been
in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the victim;
and (B) where the existence of such a relationship shall be determined
based on a consideration of the length of the relationship; the type of
relationship; and the frequency of interaction between the persons
involved in the relationship.
4. Domestic violence (as defined in the VAWA amendments to the Clery
Act), which includes any felony or misdemeanor crimes of violence
committed by a current or former spouse or intimate partner of the victim,
29 | Page
by a person with whom the victim shares a child in common, by a person
who is cohabitating with or has cohabitated with the victim as a spouse or
intimate partner, by a person similarly situated to a spouse of the victim
under Florida statute or by any other person against an adult or youth
victim who is protected from that person’s acts under the domestic or
family violence laws of Florida.
5. Stalking (as defined in the VAWA amendments to the Clery Act),
meaning engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that
would cause a reasonable person to (a) fear for their safety or the safety of
others; or (b) suffer substantial emotional distress.
(b) Retaliation, including but not limited to conduct meant to intimidate, threaten,
coerce, or discriminate against any individual for the purpose of interfering with
any right or privilege secured by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972
or its implementing regulations or UCF Policy 2-012.
(7) Larceny/Property Damage
(a) Unauthorized use, possession, or theft of property or service. Such property may
be personal or public.
(b) Damaging or defacing of University property or the property of another person
whether or not it is on University premises.
(c) Misuse, tampering with, or damaging fire safety or other safety equipment.
(8) Hazing
(a) Hazing is any action or situation that recklessly or intentionally endangers the
mental or physical health and/or safety of a student for purposes including but not
limited to: initiation or admission into, association or affiliation with, any
registered student organization or other group whether or not officially recognized
by the University. Hazing in violation of Florida Statutes may result in felony
charges. A student may commit an act of hazing whether the student is a
prospective, current, or former member of the organization or group. The actions
of active, associate, new and/or prospective members, former members, or alumni
of a student organization or group may be considered hazing under this rule.
(b) Hazing includes brutality of a physical nature such as whipping, beating,
branding, forced calisthenics, exposure to the elements; forced consumption of
any food, liquid, liquor, drug, or other substances; or other forced elements; or
other forced activity which could adversely affect the mental or physical health or
safety of the individual.
(c) Hazing includes any activity which could subject the individual to extreme mental
stress such as sleep deprivation, forced exclusion from social contact, forced
conduct that could result in extreme embarrassment, or any other activity that
could adversely affect the mental health or dignity of the individual.
(d) Hazing includes forcing, pressuring, or coercing, the student into violation of
University policies or federal, state, or local law.
(e) Hazing includes soliciting a person to commit or being actively involved in the
planning of any act of hazing as defined above where the act of hazing creates a
substantial risk of physical injury or death to the person(s) hazed.
(f) It is not defense to an allegation of hazing that:
1. the consent of the victim had been obtained;
30 | Page
2. the conduct or activity that resulted in the death or injury of a person was
not part of any official organizational event or otherwise sanctioned or
approved by the student organization; or
3. the conduct or activity that resulted in the death or injury of a person was
not done as a condition of membership into a student organization.
(g) Hazing does not include customary athletic events or other similar contests or
competitions or any activity or conduct that furthers a legal and legitimate
objective.
(9) Misuse or Unauthorized Use of Facilities and Grounds
(a) Misuse or unauthorized use of classroom or laboratory facilities, or University
property (as defined by University Regulation UCF-4.036).
(b) Abusing grounds or building structures including, but not limited to ramps, rails,
stair sets and entryways by means of recreational cycling, skating, scootering, or
other recreational activities or devices as outlined in University Regulation UCF-
4.036.
(c) Unauthorized entry or attempted entry to any University property (as defined by
University Regulation UCF-4.036).
(d) Unauthorized possession, duplication or use of keys to any University property
(as defined by University Regulation UCF-4.036).
(10) Misconduct at University Sponsored/Related Activities
(a) Violation of the UCF Rules of Conduct at any UCF sponsored or related
activities.
(b) Violations of a regulation(s) of a host institution sponsored/related activity shall
be a violation of the golden rule.
(11) Controlled Substance and Drug Violations
(a) Possessing, consuming, or attempting to possess cannabis in any amount.
(b) Cultivating, manufacturing, or attempting to obtain cannabis in any amount.
(c) Possessing, consuming, cultivating, manufacturing, or attempting to possess any
controlled substances other than cannabis, except as expressly permitted by law.
(d) Selling or distributing cannabis or any other controlled substances other than
alcohol.
(e) Possessing or attempting to possess any drug-related paraphernalia.
(f) Misconduct under the influence of controlled substance(s) and/or drugs other than
alcohol.
NOTE: Students who receive medical attention due to drug related emergencies and/or
students who call for help on behalf of another student who may be experiencing a drug
related emergency may be exempt from disciplinary action. Information regarding
exemptions under this rule for drug related emergencies can be found in University
Regulation UCF-5.007 and the Student Conduct and Academic Integrity website:
http://scai.sdes.ucf.edu/medicalemergencies .
(12) Alcoholic Beverage Violations
(a) Possessing or consuming alcoholic beverages, or possessing or using alcohol-
related paraphernalia, except as expressly permitted by the law and University
Regulations and/or Policies.
(b) Selling or distributing alcoholic beverages or alcohol-related paraphernalia,
except as expressly permitted by law and University Regulations and/or Policies
31 | Page
(c) Misconduct under the influence of alcohol
NOTE: Students who receive medical attention due to drug related emergencies and/or
students who call for help on behalf of another student who may be experiencing a drug
related emergency may be exempt from disciplinary action. Information regarding
exemptions under this rule for drug related emergencies can be found in University
Regulation UCF-5.007 and the Student Conduct and Academic Integrity website:
http://scai.sdes.ucf.edu/medicalemergencies.
(13) Possession of Weapons and/or Dangerous Materials
(a) The possession, use, or storage of weapons on property owned or controlled by
the University or at events sponsored and/or supported by the University is
prohibited, except as specifically outlined in University Policy 3-119.1 (Weapons
on University Property and at University Events).
(b) Possession or use of fireworks of any description, explosives, or chemicals which
are disruptive, explosive, or corrosive are prohibited on University premises or at
University sponsored/related activities.
(14) Instigation or Participation in Group Disturbances during Demonstrations, Parades,
or Picketing
(a) Participation in a demonstration(s), parade(s), or picketing which invades the
rights of others, which interferes with the function(s) of the University, or which
jeopardizes public order and safety.
(b) Leading or inciting others to disrupt scheduled and/or normal activities within any
campus building or area.
(15) Misuse of Computing and Telecommunications Resources
(a) Theft or other abuse of computer facilities and resources
(b) Unauthorized entry into a file, to use, read, or change the contents, or for any
other purpose.
(c) Unauthorized transfer of a file.
(d) Use of another individual’s identification and/or password.
(e) Use of computing facilities and telecommunications resources to interfere with
the work of another student or of a faculty or staff member.
(f) Use of computing facilities and telecommunications resources to send obscene
materials.
(g) Use of computing facilities and telecommunications resources to interfere with
normal operation of the University computing system.
(h) Use of computing facilities and telecommunications resources in violation of
copyright laws.
(i) Any violation of the University of Central Florida Use of Information Technology
and Resources Policy (UCF Policy 4-002), including a violation of the terms and
conditions of any third party computing system.
(j) Any violation of the University of Central Florida ResNet Acceptable Use Policy.
(16) Gambling
(a) Play in an unlawful game of chance for money or for anything of value on
University premises or at any affair sponsored by a student or registered student
organization.
32 | Page
(b) Unlawfully sell, barter or dispose of a voucher or any item for participation in a
scheme of chance by whatever name on University premises or at any affair
sponsored by a student or registered student organization.
(c) Wager on a University team or organization in a competition, with a direct
influence in the success of the competition.
(17) University Student Residence Violations. Violation(s) of any Department of Housing
and Residence Life policy, rule or regulation published in hard copy or available electronically
via Department of Housing and Residence Life website. A charge under this provision must
include a specific citation of which Housing policy or policies the charged student has violated.
(18) University Wordmark Violations. Unauthorized use of the official University wordmark,
Pegasus, monogram, seal, or other graphic identity symbol.
(19) Violation of Local, State, and/or Federal Laws. Violation of any local, state and/or
federal law that may result in a felony or misdemeanor.
(20) Complicity: Complicity is any act taken with the purpose of aiding, facilitating, promoting
or encouraging the commission of an act prohibited by the Rules of Conduct.
33 | Page
UCF-5.009 Student Conduct Review Process; Sanctions
1) Violation Reports. Alleged violations of the UCF Rules of Conduct shall be reported in
writing to the Director of the Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) or designee. Upon
receiving an alleged violation of misconduct, the Director of SCAI or designee may review
relevant information and consult with relevant parties regarding the incident in question. Where
deemed necessary to protect the safety and well-being of others, of the University, or of property,
the Director of SCAI or designee, upon notifying the VP of SDES or designee, may take
immediate action to resolve the safety and/or well-being concern by placing the student on
interim suspension. Interim suspension is not a sanction. An interim suspension is subject to
review at a hearing within three (3) business days by the VP of SDES or designee to determine
the status of the interim suspension. The outcome of an interim suspension hearing shall remain
in effect until the final disposition of any formal charges resulting from the circumstances of the
case, unless the VP of SDES or designee shall decide otherwise.
(a) The Director of the SCAI will refer all information warranting disciplinary action
and assign the case to the appropriate staff member. SCAI will send written
notification to the charged student indicating the nature of the activity in question
and what university rules were allegedly violated.
(b) Upon receipt of an incident report SCAI has six (6) months to charge a student with
a violation of the Rules of Conduct. SCAI may exercise discretion when applying
the time provision to account for circumstances that warrant a waiver of the six-
month time limit. SCAI will waive the six-month limit in cases involving sexual
harassment, dating violence, domestic violence, and stalking and may waive the
time limit for other extraordinary cases, as determined by the Director of SCAI or
designee.
(c) Students charged with alleged violations of the Rules of Conduct will receive
notice to attend a required preliminary conference with SCAI to discuss the
charges. At the preliminary conference, the student will receive information
regarding the Student Conduct Review Process, including the student’s rights
during the process, an opportunity to inspect and/or review the information known
at the time, and notice on how to contact the Student Government Judicial Advisor.
At the conclusion of the conference, SCAI recommends an option for resolution of
the disciplinary charges. If the student fails to attend the preliminary conference, a
hold may be placed on the student’s record, preventing them from registering for
future classes until the matter is resolved, and SCAI may move forward with
scheduling a formal hearing as a resolution for disciplinary charges. Students who
leave the university or withdraw from a class before a disciplinary matter is
resolved may be prohibited from future enrollment until such time as the matter is
resolved.
(2) Options for Resolution of Disciplinary Charges.
(a) Case Dismissal: The Director of SCAI or designee may dismiss a case if it is found
to not have sufficient facts or information to substantiate the claim of misconduct,
the accused person is not a student, or the action claimed as misconduct is not a
violation of the Rules of Conduct.
(b) Mediation: Depending on the nature and severity of the alleged violation, SCAI
may recommend mediation as an alternative to disciplinary action. The involved
parties must each agree to mediation. Mediation is confidential. In mediation, the
34 | Page
parties voluntarily meet with an impartial mediator to communicate their concerns
and needs to each other and to reach their own agreement on the resolution of the
case. The participants in mediation are responsible for keeping their agreement or
renegotiating it, if necessary. In the event that the participants do not agree to
mediate or mediate but do not reach a full and final resolution, the case will be
referred back for possible disciplinary action. Breach of a mediated agreement may
result in a follow up mediation session or the matter may be referred back through
the conduct process at the discretion of SCAI. Mediation will not be a resolution
option for cases involving allegations of incidents of sexual misconduct and/or
interpersonal violence.
(c) Informal Resolution Conference: At the discretion of SCAI, violations found not to
warrant a formal hearing may be referred to an informal resolution conference.
SCAI shall provide timely written notice to the student of the charges at least seven
(7) business days before the informal resolution conference. At the informal
resolution conference, the charged student has the opportunity to meet with an
SCAI member or designee and accept responsibility for the charges of violation of
the Rules of Conduct. At the informal level, the matter will be settled by the
following outcomes: punitive sanction (Disciplinary Warning, Disciplinary
Probation, or Disciplinary Deferred Suspension) as well as educational sanctions
(papers, seminars, community service, etc.). If the matter is not resolved
informally, the case will be resolved through a formal hearing. The outcomes from
an informal resolution conference (decision of responsibility and recommended
sanctions) are final and are not eligible to be appealed (UCF-5.010). The student
will receive written notice of the Resolution Agreement within ten (10) business
days of the conference, except in the case of extraordinary circumstances. Written
notice of the Resolution Agreement will include the determination regarding
responsibility for conduct violations and applicable sanctions.
(d) Formal Hearing: If an alleged violation of the Rules of Conduct is not dismissed or
otherwise resolved, then SCAI shall provide timely written notice to the student of
the charges at least seven (7) business days before the formal hearing. Except as set
forth in (5) below, the charged student may request either a panel or administrative
hearing. The charged student’s hearing shall be open only to the charged student;
the charged student’s advisor, advocate, or legal representative; the hearing body;
witnesses (when called upon); a representative from SCAI; and a legal
representative for the University. For cases of sex-based misconduct (non-Title IX
Sexual Harassment), the hearing shall also be open to the complainant and advisor.
For cases of Title IX Sexual Harassment, the hearing shall also be open to the
complainant, advisor, and support person. In cases of alleged Academic
Misconduct, the student is required to have an academic integrity hearing as stated
in UCF-5.015.
(3) Formal Hearings. There are two types of formal hearings – panel hearings and
administrative hearings.
(a) Panel Hearings.
1. A panel to consider an individual case shall be randomly selected by SCAI
from the Student Conduct Board and shall consist of two (2) faculty and
administrative staff members combined, and two (2) student members. One
panel member shall be selected by SCAI to chair the hearing and report the
35 | Page
proposed finding(s) and recommended sanctions, if any, to the Director of
SCAI or designee.
2. At hearings conducted by a panel, an SCAI staff member shall act as an
advisor to the panel. The Director of SCAI or designee shall receive the
panel’s proposed finding(s) as to "in violation" or "not in violation" of the
Rules of Conduct, and consider any sanctions proposed by the panel.
3. The Director of SCAI or designee may accept the proposed finding(s) of “in
violation” or “not in violation” or remand the case for rehearing. If the
Director of SCAI or designee accepts the proposed finding(s) of “in
violation,” they may approve, mitigate, or increase the sanctions proposed by
the panel.
4. Any decision by the Director of SCAI or designee to alter proposed sanctions
or remand a case shall be accompanied by a concise and explicit written
statement that explains the basis for that decision.
(b) Administrative Hearings
1. Administrative hearings shall be conducted by one faculty or staff member
selected by SCAI from the Student Conduct Board.
2. At hearings conducted by an administrative hearing officer, an SCAI staff
member shall act as an advisor to the administrative hearing officer. The
Director of SCAI or designee shall receive the administrative hearing
officer’s proposed finding(s) as to "in violation" or "not in violation" of the
Rules of Conduct, and consider any sanctions proposed by the administrative
hearing officer.
3. The Director of SCAI or designee may accept the proposed finding(s) of “in
violation” or “not in violation” or remand the case for rehearing. If the
Director of SCAI or designee accepts the proposed finding(s) of “in
violation,” they may approve, mitigate, or increase the sanctions proposed by
the administrative hearing officer.
4. Any decision by the Director of SCAI or designee to alter sanctions or
remand a case shall be accompanied by a concise and explicit written
statement that explains the basis for that decision.
(c) Conduct of Formal Hearings - The following is furnished as a guide to the
sequence of events in a formal hearing. The formal hearing will be recorded by the
University, and no other recordings are permitted. The recording will be made part
of the official record of the hearing.
1. Reading of charges.
2. Charged Student response of “in violation” or “not in violation.”
3. Presentation of information in support of the charges.
4. Opening statement by the charged student.
5. Questioning of the charged student.
6. Presentation and questioning of all other parties.
7. Final questions of the charged student by the hearing body.
8. Closing remarks by the charged student.
9. Hearing is brought to a close.
(d) Deliberations by the hearing body are not part of the hearing and are confidential.
Deliberations occur after the closure of the hearing and are not recorded. Following
deliberations, the hearing body will prepare a written statement of its proposed
finding(s) and, if applicable, recommend sanctions.
36 | Page
(e) Case Record for Formal Hearing - The case record shall consist of the following
items:
1. A copy of the formal charges in writing.
2. A recording of the formal hearing.
3. All staff memoranda submitted.
4. All items of physical or written documentation submitted, provided such
items are not returned to a rightful owner. In that case, photographs or other
facsimiles shall be made before return.
5. The proposed finding(s) and sanction(s) by the hearing panel or
administrator, if any.
6. The Director of SCAI’s or designee’s decision.
(f) Student Conduct Board members for panel and administrative formal hearings are
selected through an annual application and interview process with the exception of
the justices from the Student Government Judicial Branch. All Student Conduct
Board members, including justices, receive annual training from SCAI. Student
Conduct Board members who serve on hearings related to allegations of sex
discrimination, including but not limited to relationship violence, sexual assault,
sex harassment, and stalking receive additional training annually.
(4) Student Rights in the Student Conduct Review Process. The following rights apply to a
student disciplinary proceeding:
(a) The charged student shall be afforded timely written notice, at least seven (7)
business days prior to each disciplinary proceeding, unless waived in writing.
Written notice may be sent to the charged student’s electronic and/or physical
address listed in the Registrar’s records. Written notice shall include:
1. The student’s name and address.
2. Date, time, and location of the disciplinary proceeding.
3. The rule(s) of conduct allegedly violated as known at the time the notice is
sent.
4. A listing of all known witnesses that have provided, or will provide,
information against the student.
5. A description of any physical or written documentation known at the time the
notice is sent.
(b) The student may have, at their own expense and initiative, an advisor, advocate,
or legal representative to be present and who can fully participate in the
disciplinary proceeding (i.e., informal resolution conference or formal hearing). It
is the student’s responsibility to make appropriate arrangements for the advisor,
advocate, or legal representative to attend the preliminary conference or
disciplinary proceeding(s), and the disciplinary proceeding(s) shall not be delayed
due to scheduling conflicts of the chosen advisor, advocate, or legal
representative. An advisor, advocate, or legal representative may not serve as a
witness during any a disciplinary proceeding. The student may consult with their
advisor, advocate, or legal representative at any time during the preliminary
conference or disciplinary proceeding(s). This consultation must take place in a
manner that does not disrupt the preliminary conference or disciplinary
proceeding(s). If the advisor, advocate, or legal representative does not adhere to
their defined role in the Student Conduct Review Process, they may be removed
from the disciplinary proceeding.
37 | Page
(c) The Student Conduct Review Process shall be conducted on the basis that the
charged student is not in violation until the preponderance of evidence proves
otherwise, except if the student accepts responsibility for the charge(s). The
technical rules of evidence applicable to civil and criminal cases shall not apply to
the Student Conduct Review Process, including during a formal hearing. The
burden of proof is not on the student charged with a violation of the Rules of
Conduct. The university has the burden to prove, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that a violation has taken place. Nothing contained in this paragraph
prohibits or limits the University in offering other forms of resolution, such as
mediation or informal resolution.
(d) The student shall have the right to an impartial hearing officer for the formal
hearing. Prior to the commencement of the formal hearing, the charged student
shall have the opportunity to challenge the impartiality of any member(s) of the
hearing body. If the student shows good cause for the removal of any member(s)
of the hearing body, the Associate Vice President and Dean of Students or
designee will assign a new hearing body member.
(e) At least five (5) business days before the informal resolution conference or formal
hearing, the University will provide the student with the opportunity to inspect all
known information relating to the allegation(s), including inculpatory and
exculpatory information. The University also has the right to review any
information the student intends to use at the informal resolution conference or
formal hearing at least five (5) business days before the informal resolution
conference or formal hearing. During a formal hearing, only such information that
is determined to be “Relevant Information” will be allowed.
(f) The University cannot compel any person to attend a formal hearing. However, all
parties may arrange for witnesses to voluntarily present Relevant Information
during the proceeding. The questioning of a witness shall be facilitated by the
hearing officer or panel conducting the formal hearing.
(g) The student shall not be forced to present self-incriminating information during a
disciplinary proceeding. In addition, the student reserves the right to remain silent.
Such silence may not be used against the student. The University is not required
to postpone any disciplinary proceeding(s) pending the outcome of any civil or
criminal case. The University’s formal hearing is not a criminal or judicial
proceeding and is designed to address student behavior; therefore, alleged
violations of the UCF Rules of Conduct will be addressed independently of any
outcome imposed by the courts for a criminal offense.
(h) The proposed finding, as well as the Director of SCAI’s or designee’s
determination, of “in violation” or "not in violation” on the charges shall be based
solely on the information presented at the formal hearing.
(i) Should the student fail to attend the scheduled formal hearing, the hearing will be
held in the student’s absence and the proposed findings, including any
recommended sanctions, will be made using the information available at the time
of the scheduled formal hearing.
(j) Only if the proposed finding of the formal hearing body is that the student is in
violation, will prior conduct history be reviewed and potentially affect proposed
sanctioning.
38 | Page
(k) The results of any formal hearing shall be made available to the charged student
within ten (10) business days following the hearing. Should SCAI need additional
time, the deadline can be extended by the Director of SCAI or designee by
notifying the charged student. For academic integrity cases, the results of any
formal hearing shall be made available to the charged student within fifteen (15)
business days following the hearing. The Director of SCAI or designee shall
notify the charged student in writing of the need for additional time.
(l) The student’s enrollment status shall remain unchanged pending the University’s
final agency action in the matter, except in cases where the VP of SDES or
designee determines that the safety, health, or general welfare of the student, any
individual, or any part of the University may be involved.
(5) Additional Procedures in Cases of Sex-Based Misconduct and Title IX Sexual
Harassment
(a) In cases involving sex-based misconduct or Title IX sexual harassment, a single
hearing officer will be the only option for a formal hearing.
(b) Where a student is charged with a violation of UCF-5.008(5), the procedures
outlined in UCF-5.006(6) and UCF Policy 2-004 will apply in addition to the
procedures of the Student Conduct Review Process outlined above.
(c) Where a student is charged with Title IX Sexual Harassment as prohibited under
UCF-5.008(6), the procedures outlined in UCF-5.006(7) and the Title IX
Grievance Policy (University Policy 2-012) will apply in place of the procedures
of the Student Conduct Review Process outlined above, except that UCF-
5.009(4)(a) and (e) will apply, and the sanctions outlined below may be applied to
violations of UCF-5.008(6) Title IX Sexual Harassment.
(d) The sanctions outlined below may be applied to violations of UCF-5.008(5) Sex-
Based Misconduct (non-Title IX) and UCF-5.008(6) Title IX Sexual Harassment.
(6) Sanctions.
(a) Disciplinary Warning - An official warning that the student’s behavior is in
violation of the UCF Rules of Conduct.
(b) Disciplinary Probation – Disciplinary Probation status shall be for a specific length
of time in which any further violation of the Rules of Conduct puts the student’s
status with the University in jeopardy. While on Disciplinary Probation, the student
may continue to attend classes and is given a chance to show capability and
willingness to live in accordance with the Rules of Conduct. If the student is found
“in-violation” for another violation of the Rules of Conduct, while on Disciplinary
Probation, more severe sanctions may be imposed. Restrictive conditions may be
imposed and vary according to the severity of the offense. A non-exhaustive list of
possible restrictive conditions shall be listed on the SCAI website
(scai.sdes.ucf.edu). Student leadership eligibility shall be governed by the
eligibility requirements outlined by the Office of Student Involvement and their
eligibility appeal process. While on Disciplinary Probation, a hold will be placed
on a student’s record for record keeping purposes.
(c) Deferred Disciplinary Suspension - Deferred Disciplinary Suspension is a
designated period of time during which a student is given the opportunity to
demonstrate the ability to abide by the Rules of Conduct. Deferred Disciplinary
Suspension is used for offenses found serious enough to warrant Disciplinary
Suspension, but where the specific circumstances of the case mitigate the offense or
39 | Page
for repeated offenses of a less serious nature. During a Deferred Disciplinary
Suspension, the student will be officially suspended from the university, but the
suspension will be deferred, meaning that the student may continue to attend
classes. Students placed on Deferred Disciplinary Suspension will have a conduct
overlay placed on their transcripts for the period of time that the Deferred
Disciplinary Suspension is in effect. The conduct overlay is a notation indicating
that the student is not in good standing. Restrictive conditions may be imposed and
vary according to the severity of the offense. A non-exhaustive list of possible
restrictive conditions shall be listed on the SCAI website (scai.sdes.ucf.edu).
Student leadership eligibility shall be governed by the eligibility requirements
outlined by the Office of Student Involvement and their eligibility appeal process.
A disciplinary suspension will be enforced for failure to complete any assigned
educational sanctions by the deadline(s) and/or for any subsequent violation of the
Rules of Conduct, unless the Director of SCAI determines otherwise in exceptional
circumstances. If the student is found in violation for any violation(s) of the Rules
of Conduct that occurred while on Deferred Disciplinary Suspension status,
including failure to complete any assigned educational sanctions by the deadline(s),
the student will be suspended for a minimum of one (1) semester, in addition to the
educational sanctions imposed for the subsequent violation. While on Deferred
Disciplinary Suspension, a hold will be placed on a student’s record for
recordkeeping purposes.
(d) Disciplinary Suspension - A student involved in an offense warranting
consideration of action more serious than Deferred Disciplinary Suspension or one
involved in repeated misconduct may face Disciplinary Suspension. During the
period of Disciplinary Suspension, a student may not be enrolled in classes,
participate in University related activities, whether they occur on or off campus. A
student under Disciplinary Suspension may not otherwise be present on University
premises unless authorized in writing in advance under conditions approved by the
Director of SCAI. Upon being withdrawn, the student may no longer enroll in
classes, may not be an active member of a Registered Student Organization, may
no longer use university facilities, must vacate university owned housing, may no
longer be permitted on university property, may not be employed by the University,
and may be entitled to whatever refunds of tuition, fees, and room and board
charges as would be appropriate given the timing of the withdrawal. In determining
if and to what extent suspended students shall be authorized to be on University
premises, the Director of SCAI or designee shall consider whether the suspension
creates an undue hardship on the disciplinary suspended student. Students placed
on Disciplinary Suspension will have a conduct overlay placed on their transcript
for the period of time that the Disciplinary Suspension is in effect. The conduct
overlay is a notation indicating that the student is not in good standing. Further,
while on Disciplinary Suspension, a hold will be placed on a student’s record for
record keeping purposes. All assigned educational sanctions must be completed
prior to the conclusion of Disciplinary Suspension; otherwise, the Disciplinary
Suspension will remain in effect.
(e) Disciplinary Dismissal Disciplinary Dismissal is a sanction which removes the
student from the individual’s academic program and separates the student from the
University for a period of at least two years and up to seven years. A dismissed
student has none of the rights or privileges of a student of the University.
40 | Page
Following Disciplinary Dismissal, the individual must apply for readmission to the
University. Readmission is possible but not guaranteed and will only be considered
after the two-to-seven-year time allotted from the effective date of the Dismissal,
based on meeting all readmission criteria and obtaining clearance from the
Associate Vice President and Dean of Students or designee. This may include
restricted access to campus and/or other specified activities. Students placed on
Disciplinary Dismissal will have a conduct overlay placed on their transcript for the
period of time that the Disciplinary Dismissal is in effect. The conduct overlay is a
notation indicating that the student is not in good standing. Further, while on
Disciplinary Dismissal, a hold will be placed on a student’s record for record
keeping purposes. All assigned educational sanctions must be completed prior to
the conclusion of Disciplinary Dismissal; otherwise, the Disciplinary Dismissal
will remain in effect.
(f) Delayed Issuance of Diploma: The issuance of a student’s diploma from the
University of Central Florida will be withheld until the completion of a stated time
frame and all educational sanctions imposed through the Student Conduct Review
Process.
(g) Delayed Conferral of Degree The Administrative process of a student’s degree
being conferred through the University’s Registrar’s Office will be delayed. This
means the student’s degree will not be awarded until the completion of a stated
time frame and all educational sanctions imposed through the Student Conduct
Review Process.
(h) Disciplinary Expulsion – Disciplinary Expulsion is a sanction which removes the
student from the individual’s academic program and permanently separates a
student from the University without opportunity to graduate or re-enroll at the
university in the future. An overlay will be permanently placed on the student’s
record. Further, a hold will be permanently placed on a student’s record for record
keeping purposes.
(i) Educational Sanctions - In conjunction with a sanction listed above, a student found
to have been in violation of any of the Rules of Conduct will be assigned
educational requirements such as, but not limited to, reflective/research papers,
classes/seminars, interviews, etc. Educational sanctions are intended to provide a
student with opportunities to repair the harm of their actions and to engage in
meaningful developmental experiences that will help the student in avoiding future
violations of University policy.
41 | Page
UCF-5.010 Student Conduct Appeals
(1) Appeals within the Student Conduct Review Process
(a) Students found in violation as a result of a formal hearing may appeal the
finding(s) and sanction(s) imposed. The appeal must be made in writing to the
Appellate Officer (VP of SDES or designee) within ten (10) business days after
the date the student was notified of the decision by the Director of Student
Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) or designee. The person designated to
hear the appeal may not have directly participated in any other proceeding related
to the charged violation. The appeal form can be found at
http://scai.sdes.ucf.edu/process.
(b) Students may appeal the finding and sanction(s) imposed on the basis of one or
more of the following:
1. Irregularities in fairness and stated procedures of the hearing that could
have affected the outcome of the hearing.
2. Discovery of new and significant information that could have affected the
outcome of the hearing and that was not known or could not reasonably
have been discovered and/or presented at the time of the initial hearing.
3. The sanction(s) are extraordinarily disproportionate to the violation(s).
(c) On the appeal form, the student must state the reason(s) for appeal, the supporting
facts, and the recommended solution. This is not a re-hearing of the conduct case.
An appeal cannot be filed simply because a student is dissatisfied with the
decision. Failure to describe the nature of the information in full detail in the
appeal letter will result in the denial of an appeal.
(d) The appellate officer shall first determine if sufficient grounds for appeal exist
and then, if so, the appellate officer may: deny the appeal, thus sustaining the
initial decision; alter the sanction(s); or return the case for a new hearing. Any
decision by the appellate officer to alter sanctions or return a case for new hearing
shall be accompanied by a concise and explicit written statement that explains the
basis for that decision.
(e) The appellate officer should issue a written decision to the student’s appeal within
twenty (20) business days of receipt of the appeal. Should the appellate officer
require additional time for review beyond the twenty (20) business days, the
appellate officer shall notify the charged student in writing of the need for
additional time. Decisions of the appellate officer reflect final agency action.
(f) Any decision by an appellate officer to alter sanctions or return a case shall be
accompanied by a concise and explicit written statement that explains the basis
for that decision.
(g) SCAI cannot place an overlay on the student’s record until the appeal decision is
completed or if the student chooses not to appeal. At such time, if appropriate, a
hold and/or overlay, is placed on the student’s record. If the appellate officer
upholds the original findings, the effective date of any disciplinary sanction(s)
imposed will revert back to the date of the Director of SCAI’s or designee’s final
decision letter.
42 | Page
(2) Appeals within the Student Conduct Review Process for Cases Involving Sex-Based
Misconduct and/or Title IX Sexual Harassment
(a) Complainants and Respondents in matters involving allegations of Sex-Based
Misconduct and/or Title IX Sexual Harassment (as defined in Regulation UCF-
5.008(5) and UCF-5.008(6)) may appeal the finding(s) and sanction(s) imposed
from a student conduct formal hearing. The appeal must be made in writing to the
Appellate Officer (VP of SDES or designee) within ten (10) business days after
the date both the Respondent and Complainant are notified of the decision by the
Director of SCAI or designee. The person designated to hear the appeal may not
have directly participated in any other proceeding related to the charged violation.
The appeal form can be found at https://scai.sdes.ucf.edu/student-appeal/.
(b) In cases charged under 5.008(5), Complainants and Respondents may appeal the
finding and sanction(s) imposed on the basis of one or more of the following:
1. Irregularities in fairness and stated procedures of the hearing that could
have affected the outcome of the hearing.
2. Discovery of new and significant information that could have affected the
outcome of the hearing and that was not known or could not reasonably
have been discovered and/or presented at the time of the initial hearing.
3. The sanction(s) are extraordinarily disproportionate to the violation(s).
(c) In cases charged under 5.008(6), Complainants and Respondents may appeal the
finding and sanction(s) imposed on the basis of one or more of the following:
1. Procedural irregularity that materially affected the outcome of the matter
(i.e., a failure to follow the University’s own procedures).
2. New evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the
Determination of Responsibility, or dismissal was made, that could
materially affect the outcome of the matter.
3. The Decision-Maker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against an
individual party, or for or against Complainants or Respondents in general,
that materially affected the outcome of the matter.
4. The sanction(s) are extraordinarily disproportionate to the violation(s).
(d) On the appeal form, the student must state the reason(s) for appeal, supporting
facts, and the recommended solution. Failure to describe the nature of the
information in full detail in the appeal letter will result in the denial of the appeal.
(e) The appellate officer shall first determine if sufficient grounds for appeal exist
and then, if so, the appellate officer may: deny the appeal, thus sustaining the
initial decision; alter sanction(s); or return the case for a new hearing.
(f) The appellate officer should issue a written decision to the student’s appeal within
twenty (20) business days of receipt of the appeal. The written decision shall issue
to both the Complainant and the Respondent. Should the appellate officer require
additional time for review beyond the twenty (20) business days, the appellate
officer shall notify the Complainant and Respondent in writing of the need for
additional time. Decisions of the appellate officer reflect final university action.
(g) Any decision by an Appellate Officer to alter sanctions or return a case shall be
accompanied by a concise and explicit written statement that explains the basis
for that decision.
(3) Community ReEngagement and Educational Development (CREED) Program
43 | Page
(a) The Community ReEngagement and Educational Development (CREED)
Program is designated for a student to have the opportunity to demonstrate that in
the period following the conclusion of the Student Conduct Review Process, they
have taken steps to become a productive and engaged member of the UCF
Community.
(b) Upon completion of one semester of Disciplinary Probation, Deferred
Disciplinary Suspension, or Disciplinary Suspension and completion of all
educational sanctions, a student can request a review of their disciplinary status
through the Community ReEngagement and Educational Development (CREED)
Program. Students who have a Z Designation on their transcript are eligible to
apply once the duration of their Disciplinary Suspension has ended and all
educational sanctions are complete.
1. Students who have been found In Violation of a Rule of Conduct that
required an investigation by the Office of Institutional Equity (OIE) are
ineligible to apply for relief under the CREED Program.
2. Students who have been found In Violation of a Rule of Conduct that had
a substantially negative impact on a person or group of people, as
determined by SCAI, are ineligible to seek relief under the CREED
Program.
(c) Requests must be submitted to the Director of SCAI or designee via an online
CREED Program submission form available at www.scai.sdes.ucf.edu/creed .
This request can only be submitted once a semester.
(d) The Director of SCAI or designee will review applications submitted before the
semesterly deadline(s) during the application review period(s). Information on
application deadlines and review periods can be found at
https://scai.sdes.ucf.edu/creed-program/ . The Director of SCAI or designee shall
conduct a preliminary review to ensure that the student’s request meets the
necessary eligibility and application requirements. The Director of SCAI or
designee must communicate the finding of the preliminary review of the
application as well as the date and time of the CREED Review Meeting that has
been scheduled for a committee to conduct a review of the student’s application,
if applicable. The student has three (3) business days from when the Director of
SCAI or designee sent their preliminary findings to request an alternate date and
time of the CREED Review Meeting.
(e) Prior to this meeting, the committee will have reviewed the submitted packet and
will prepare questions for the student to address, as well as provide the student
with the opportunity to further discuss why their disciplinary status should be
altered or terminated or why the Z Designation should be removed from the
student’s transcript. No alterations shall be made to include new or increased
sanctions. Should the committee feel that further information and/or
documentation is necessary in order to render a recommendation, the review may
be temporarily recessed. The student will be given ten (10) business days to
produce the information and/or documentation. Upon receipt of the requested
information and/or documentation, the committee will reconvene the CREED
Review Meeting with the student.
(f) After the meeting, the committee will issue a recommendation to the Director of
SCAI or designee. The Director of SCAI or designee will provide a final decision
44 | Page
to the student in writing within ten (10) business days of receiving the
recommendation.
(g) If the request is denied by the Director of SCAI or designee the final decision
shall include a concise and explicit written statement that explains the basis for
that decision and suggested action items for the student’s success.
(h) There is no appeal process for a CREED Review Meeting decision.
(4) Sealing of Records
(a) A student’s conduct record is eligible to be sealed if the incident(s) in question are
minor and do not result in disciplinary suspension, disciplinary dismissal, or
disciplinary expulsion and/or if the student is not current on disciplinary probation
or deferred suspension with all educational sanctions completed in full.
(b) A student conduct record may be sealed upon the successful submission and
review of appropriate paperwork to SCAI.
(c) The factors influencing the decision by the Director of SCAI for sealing are the
severity of the violation, effect of the violation on the University community,
sanctions applied, completion of sanctions, and ethical development demonstrated
by the student.
(d) There is no appeals process regarding student conduct record sealing.
45 | Page
UCF-5.011 Scope; Authority; Principles of Student Group
Responsibility; Violations of Law and Organizational Rules of
Conduct Violations; Conduct Records; Medical Emergencies
(Alcohol & Drugs)
(1) Scope
(a) The organizational conduct regulations (UCF-5.011, 5.012, and 5.013) shall apply
to all registered student organizations, including those at its regional campuses
and/or at off campus instructional sites, and shall be deemed a part of the terms
and conditions of registered student organization registration. The right of all
students to seek knowledge, debate ideas, form opinions, and freely express their
ideas is fully recognized by the University of Central Florida, including when
students come together as a group.
(b) The Organizational Rules of Conduct apply to all registered student organizations
for conduct that occurs:
1. On University premises; or
2. During or while participating in University and/or organization sponsored
or related activities; or
3. During school sessions, holidays, breaks, and university closures; or
4. Against students or non-students.
(c) The University may take action against a registered student organization for off-
campus conduct if the conduct is specifically prohibited by law or the
Organizational Rules of Conduct; or if the conduct poses (or demonstrates that the
student organization’s continued recognition at the University poses) a danger to
the health, safety or welfare of the University community; or if the conduct is
disruptive to the orderly processes and functions of the University.
(2) Authority
(a) The Florida Board of Governors Regulation 6.0105 requires each university to
establish a Student Disciplinary System, including a code of conduct, to apply to
student disciplinary proceedings. The Florida Board of Governors Regulation
6.021 requires each university to establish an anti-hazing policy as part of the
student code of conduct.
(b) These regulations shall ensure a fair and impartial process in registered student
organizational disciplinary proceedings and guarantee the integrity of the
university.
(c) Generally, authority necessary to enforce the organizational conduct regulations is
vested in the Vice President for Student Development and Enrollment Services or
designee. Selected functions of this authority are shared with faculty, staff and
students. Some functions of the conduct process are assisted through review
boards.
(3) Definitions. Definitions for terms used in this section, as well as in the Organizational
Conduct Review Process, are located in UCF-5.006(3).
(4) Principles of Student Group Responsibility.
(a) Any registered student organization can be held responsible for its actions or the
actions of a collection of its members acting together. Misconduct on the part of
46 | Page
an individual member(s) may not automatically be sufficient to initiate the
Organizational Conduct Review Process.
(b) Students may be held accountable as individuals under the Rules of Conduct for
their conduct, whether the students are acting in an individual capacity or the
students are acting as a member of a registered student organization.
(c) The following criteria will be used to determine if a registered student
organization can be held responsible for the actions of one or more individuals
when those actions result in a violation of the Organizational Rules of Conduct:
1. A violation arises out of an organization-sponsored, financed, or otherwise
sanctioned activity or event, where the organization provided the context for
the violation.
2. A pattern of individual violations has occurred and/or continues to occur
within the organization without adequate control, response, or disciplinary
action on the part of the registered student organization or its executive board
members or officers.
3. The action resulting in the violation has received either the implied or overt
consent of the registered student organization or any executive board
members or officers of the registered student organization.
4. The registered student organization or any executive board member or officer
of the registered student organization fails to report and take reasonable
action against invitees/members responsible for the Organizational Rules
Conduct violation.
5. The registered student organization overtly places or implicitly allows active
members of the registered student organization to be in a position to act on
behalf or with authority of the organization.
6. The registered student organization chooses to protect one or more individual
offenders who are active members of the registered student organization from
official actions.
(d) Should a reported incident occur where an organization is named as allegedly
violating an Organizational Rule of Conduct, the University may conduct an
investigation to gather facts to help provide further context to the original
complaint. The investigative process may include administering surveys to
organization members and/or conducting interviews with persons associated with
or believed to have knowledge about the reported incident. An investigative report
will be drafted containing findings. Next steps following the investigation may be
to close the case, request more information, or initiate a disciplinary proceeding.
(5) Medical Emergencies. The University of Central Florida highly encourages students and
registered student organizations to call for medical assistance whenever an individual
experiences severe intoxication or serious injury after consuming alcohol and/or drugs. Students
and registered student organizations may be reluctant to call for help for themselves or others
due to potential involvement from the law enforcement officials or Student Conduct and
Academic Integrity (SCAI). Due to the serious or life-threatening nature of these medical
emergencies, the University of Central Florida urges students to contact emergency medical
services or law enforcement officials if alcohol-related and/or drug-related medical emergencies
arise. The University’s primary goal is to create a safe environment for its students. Procedures
and expectations regarding these incidents have been outlined in SCAI Rules of Conduct
47 | Page
Controlled Substance and Drug Violations and Alcoholic Beverages section and the
Organizational Rules of Conduct section.
(a) Alcohol Emergencies - University Expectations for Student Groups. Student
groups may be eligible for exemptions from disciplinary action when a
representative of an organization at a student group event calls for emergency
assistance on behalf of a person experiencing an alcohol related emergency.
Student groups that seek medical assistance for alcohol emergencies may receive
exemption for violations of the Organizational Rules of Conduct Section UCF-
5.012 6(a)-6(f); however, exemption for other Organizational Rule of Conduct
violations may not be granted. Student groups may be eligible for this exemption
on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the Director of SCAI. Additional
information regarding alcohol emergencies can be found at the SCAI website.
(b) Drug-Related Emergencies - University Expectations for Student Groups. Student
groups may be eligible for exemptions from disciplinary action when a
representative of an organization at a student group event calls for emergency
assistance on behalf of a person experiencing a drug-related emergency. Student
groups that seek medical assistance for drug-related emergencies may receive
exemption for violations of the Organizational Rules of Conduct Section UCF-
5.012 7(a)-7(d); however, exemption for other Organizational Rule of Conduct
violations may not be granted. Student groups may be eligible for this exemption
on a case by case basis at the discretion of the Director of SCAI. Additional
information regarding drug-related emergencies can be found at the SCAI
website.
(6) Violations of Law and Rule of Conduct Violations. Students who commit offenses
against the laws of municipalities, states, or the United States are subject to prosecution by those
authorities and may be subject to disciplinary action by the University when their conduct
violates institutional standards. Students shall not be forced to present self-incriminating
evidence; however, the University is not required to postpone disciplinary proceedings pending
the outcome of any civil or criminal case. The Student Organization Conduct process is not a
criminal or judicial proceeding and is designed to address registered student organization
behavior as outlined in the Principles of Student Group Responsibility, above; therefore, alleged
violations of the Organizational Rules of Conduct will be addressed independently of any
penalty imposed by the courts for the criminal offense.
(7) Student Organizational Conduct Records
(a) Maintenance of Records. A registered student organization’s or other student
group’s conduct case record will be maintained in SCAI. The case record of a
registered student organization found responsible for charge(s) against them, with
sanctions less than organizational suspension or revocation, will generally be
maintained in SCAI for seven years from the calendar year of record, after which
they are destroyed. The case record of a registered student organization that has
been suspended or whose registration has been revoked will be permanently
maintained by SCAI.
(b) Release of Records. The release of registered student organization and other
student group disciplinary records will be governed by applicable federal and
state laws regarding the privacy of education records.
48 | Page
UCF-5.012 Organizational Rules of Conduct
Registered student organizations are expected to abide by these Organizational Rules of
Conduct, and administrators and faculty are expected to enforce them. The prohibition on hazing
found in Section (10), below, shall apply equally to registered student organizations and other
student groups, whether or not officially recognized by the University. These rules should be
read broadly and are not intended to define prohibited conduct in exhaustive terms. These rules
may be revised during the year; announcements will be made on adoption of changes or
additions. The right of all students to seek knowledge, debate ideas, form opinions, and freely
express their ideas is fully recognized by the University of Central Florida, including when
students come together as student group; accordingly, the rules below will not be used to impose
discipline for a student group’s lawful expression of ideas. Specific restrictions on time and place
of meetings and assemblies are found in other University regulations or policies and student
groups are expected to follow those restrictions. The following is a non-exhaustive list of
prohibited conduct for which disciplinary action may be taken at the University of Central
Florida.
(1) Theft, Disregard for Property
(a) Malicious or unwarranted damage or destruction of another's property.
(b) Taking, attempting to take, or keeping in its possession property or services not
belonging to the registered student organization.
(c) Misuse or mishandling of organizational funds by any officer, member, or other
individual.
(2) Possessing and/or Providing False and Misleading Information
(a) Withholding related information, or furnishing false, misleading, incomplete, or
incorrect information (oral or written) to University officials (faculty or staff), or
law enforcement officers.
(b) Possession, use or attempted use of any form of fraudulent identification,
including the credentials or identification of an individual or organization.
(c) Forgery, alteration or misuse of any University document, material, file, record or
instrument of identification.
(d) Deliberately and purposefully providing false or misleading verbal or written
information about another person.
(e) Falsification, distortion, or misrepresentation of information during an
investigation or the student conduct review process, including knowingly
initiating a false complaint.
(f) Fraud: Any act of deceit or misrepresentation for purposes of financial or personal
gain.
(3) Disruptive Conduct
(a) Any act that impairs, interferes with, or obstructs the orderly conduct, processes,
and functions of the University or any part thereof or the rights of one or more
individuals.
(b) Obstructing the free movement of other students around the campus, interfering
with the use of University facilities, preventing the normal operation of the
University; or conducting any event that interferes with the normal progress of
academic events on campus.
49 | Page
(c) Any act that intentionally interferes with an election process of any University
registered or sponsored student organization.
(d) Engaging in obscene or indecent conduct.
(e) Failure to comply with the administrative policies as enacted by the University.
(f) Failure to comply with the directions of University officials or authorized agents
acting in the performance of their duties. Registered student organization officers
and members shall comply with all directions or requests of University officials,
University police officers or authorized agents in a timely manner.
(g) Hindering or interfering with the Organizational Conduct Review Process by
failing to obey the notice from a university official to appear for a student conduct
meeting or hearing and/or attempting to discourage an individual’s proper
participating in, or use of, the Organizational Conduct Review Process.
(h) Participating in any event with a registered student organization that is currently
on Organizational Disciplinary Probation (with restrictive conditions) or
Organizational Deferred Suspension (with restrictive Conditions), is currently
suspended, or that has had their UCF registration revoked.
(i) Failure to comply with any other University regulation or policy as described in
the UCF Regulations, UCF Policies and Procedures, or University department
publicized policy.
(4) Harmful Behavior
(a) Physical violence towards another person or group.
(b) Discriminatory Harassment: Discriminatory harassment consists of verbal,
physical, electronic or other conduct based upon a protected class as defined in
University Policy 2-004, or membership in other protected classes set forth in
state or federal law that interferes with that individual’s educational or
employment opportunities, participation in a university program or activity, or
receipt of legitimately-requested services meeting the description of either Hostile
Environment Harassment or Quid Pro Quo Harassment, as defined in University
Policy 2-004 Prohibition of Discrimination, Harassment, and Related.
Interpersonal Violence.
(c) Bullying: Defined as behavior of any sort (including communicative behavior)
directed at another, that is severe, pervasive, or persistent, and is of a nature that
would cause a reasonable person or group in the target’s position substantial
emotional distress and undermine his or her ability to work, study, or participate
in University life or regular activities, or which would place a reasonable person
in fear of injury or death.
(d) Verbal, digital, or written abuse, threats, intimidation, coercion and/or other
conduct that endangers the health, safety or well-being of another person or
group, or which would place a reasonable person in fear of bodily injury or death.
This definition, however, shall not be interpreted to abridge the rights of the
University community to freedom of expression protected by the First
Amendment of the United States Constitution and any other applicable law.
(e) Failure to respect the privacy of other individuals.
(f) Retaliation against or harassment of Complainant(s), other person(s) alleging
misconduct, or anyone who participates in an investigation of harassment.
(5) Sex-Based Misconduct
50 | Page
(a) Sexual Assault. Sexual assault means sexual contact without consent.
(b) Sexual Harassment: Sexual harassment means any unwelcome sexual advance,
request for sexual favors, or other unwanted conduct of a sexual nature, whether
verbal, non-verbal, graphic, physical, or otherwise, when the conditions for
Discriminatory Harassment as defined in UCF Policy 2-004 are present.
(c) Gender-Based Harassment: Gender-based harassment is discriminatory
harassment that is based on gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender
expression, which may include acts of aggression, intimidation, or hostility,
whether verbal or non-verbal, graphic, physical, or otherwise, even if the acts do
not involve conduct of a sexual nature, when the conditions for Discriminatory
Harassment as defined in UCF Policy 2-004 are present.
(d) Obscene or Indecent Behavior - Exposure of one’s body in such a manner that
another party reasonably could be offended or to display sexual behavior which
another person reasonably finds offensive.
(e) Voyeurism - Trespass, spying, or eavesdropping for the purpose of sexual
gratification.
(f) Solicitation of a Minor – soliciting sexual acts from a minor by oral, written, or
electronic means.
(g) Child Pornography – possessing, producing or the dissemination of child
pornography
(h) Stalking: Stalking occurs when there is a coordinated course of conduct directed
at a specific person under circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to
fear for the person’s safety or the safety of others, or to experience substantial
emotional distress. A “course of conduct” is two or more acts, including but not
limited to acts in which a person directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by
any action, method, device, or means, follows, monitors, observes, surveils,
threatens, or communicates to or about another person, or interferes with another
person’s property. Stalking includes “cyber-stalking,” a particular form of
stalking in which a person uses electronic media, such as the internet, social
networks, blogs, phones, texts, or other similar devices or forms of contact.
Stalking may include, but is not limited to: non-consensual communications (face
to face, telephone, e-mail); threatening or obscene gestures;
surveillance/following/pursuit; showing up outside the targeted individual’s
classroom or workplace; sending gifts and/or notes (romantic, bizarre, sinister, or
perverted); and/or making threats.
(i) Sexual Exploitation: Sexual Exploitation is purposely or knowingly doing or
attempting to do any of the following:
1. Recording or photographing private sexual activity and/or a person’s
intimate parts (including genitalia, groin, breasts or buttocks) without
consent;
2. Disseminating or posting images of private sexual activity and/or a
person’s intimate parts (including genitalia, groin, breasts or buttocks)
without consent;
3. Allowing third parties to observe private sexual activity from a hidden
location (e.g., closet) or through electronic means (e.g., Skype or
livestreaming of images);
4. Subjecting another person to human trafficking.
(j) Any attempted acts of Sex-Based Misconduct are also violations of this policy.
51 | Page
(6) Alcohol-Related Misconduct
(a) Use and/or possession of alcoholic beverages, except as expressly permitted by
law and University regulations/policies.
(b) Sale and/or distribution of alcoholic beverages, except as expressly permitted by
the law and University regulations/policies.
(c) Furnishing or causing to be furnished any alcoholic beverage to any person under
the legal drinking age.
(d) Misconduct under the influence of alcohol.
(e) Furnishing or causing to be furnished any alcoholic beverage to any person in a
state of noticeable intoxication.
(f) Failure of a registered student organization to take all necessary steps to see that
no person under the legal drinking age possesses alcoholic beverages at functions
it sponsors or within any property or transportation it owns, operates, and/or rents.
NOTE: Registered student organizations may be eligible for exemptions from
disciplinary action when a representative of an organization at a registered student
organizational event calls for emergency assistance on behalf of a person experiencing an
alcohol related emergency. Information regarding exemptions under this rule for alcohol
related emergencies can be found in University Regulation UCF–5.011 and the Student
Conduct & Academic Integrity website: http://scai.sdes.ucf.edu/medicalemergencies .
(7) Drug-Related Misconduct
(a) Unlawful use and/or possession of any narcotic or other controlled substances,
and possession and/or use of drug paraphernalia.
(b) Sale and/or distribution of any narcotic or other controlled substances.
(c) Cultivation and/or manufacture of any narcotic or other controlled substances.
(d) Attempt to obtain any narcotic or other controlled substances, except as expressly
permitted by law.
NOTE: Registered student organizations may be eligible for exemptions from
disciplinary action when a representative of an organization at a registered student
organizational event calls for emergency assistance on behalf of a person experiencing a
drug related emergency. Information regarding exemptions under this rule for drug
related emergencies can be found in University Regulation UCF-5.011 and the Student
Conduct and Academic Integrity website: http://scai.sdes.ucf.edu/medicalemergencies.
(8) Unauthorized Entry Unauthorized entry, attempted entry, or loitering in private or
restricted areas.
(9) Gambling
(a) Play or sponsor of an unlawful game of chance for money or for anything of value
on University premises or at any affair sponsored by a registered or sponsored
student organization.
(b) Unlawful sale, barter, or disposition of a voucher or any item for participation in a
scheme of chance by whatever name on University premises or at any activity
sponsored by a registered or sponsored student organization
(c) Wagering on a University team or organization in a competition, with or without
intent to have a direct influence in the success of the competition.
(10) Hazing
(a) Hazing is any action or situation that recklessly or intentionally endangers the
mental or physical health and/or safety of a student for purposes including but not
52 | Page
limited to initiation or admission into, or association or affiliation with, any
registered student organization or other group whether or not officially recognized
by the University. Hazing which violates Florida Statutes may result in felony
charges. A student may commit an act of hazing whether the student is a
prospective, current, or former member of the organization or group. The actions
of active, associate, new and/or prospective members, former members, or alumni
of a registered student organization or other student group may be considered
hazing under this rule.
(b) Hazing includes brutality of a physical nature such as whipping, beating,
branding, forced calisthenics, exposure to the elements; forced consumption of
any food, liquor, liquid, drug, or other substances; or other forced elements; or
other forced activity which could adversely affect the mental or physical health or
safety of the individual.
(c) Hazing includes any activity that could subject the individual to extreme mental
or physical stress such as sleep deprivation, forced exclusion from social contact,
forced conduct that could result in extreme embarrassment, or any other activity
that could adversely affect the mental or physical health or dignity of the
individual.
(d) Hazing includes forcing, pressuring, coercing, or requiring the violation of
University policies, federal, state, or local law.
(e) Hazing includes soliciting a person to commit or being actively involved in the
planning of any act of hazing as defined above where the act of hazing creates a
substantial risk of physical injury or death to the person(s) hazed.
(f) It is not a defense to an allegation of hazing that:
1. The consent of the victim had been obtained;
2. The conduct or activity that resulted in the death or injury of a person was
not part of any official organizational event or otherwise sanctioned or
approved by the student organization or group; or
3. The conduct or activity that resulted in the death or injury of a person was
not done as a condition of membership into a student organization.
(g) Hazing does not include customary athletic events or other similar contests or
competitions or any activity or conduct that furthers a legal and legitimate
objective.
(h) All student groups, whether or not registered with the University and whether or
not officially recognized by the University are subject to the same hazing
prohibitions set out in this section (10). With regard to student groups that are not
registered students organizations, and against which there is an allegation of
hazing, the principles of group responsibility and scope provisions of University
Regulation UCF-5.011(1)(b), (1)(c), and (4) shall apply, as well as the conduct
proceeding procedures of University Regulation UCF-5.013.
(11) Outstanding Debt. Failure to pay on and off campus vendors in a timely manner. Groups
shall not knowingly enter into purchase or rental agreements that are beyond the resources of the
organization’s ability to pay. The University will not cover outstanding debts of registered
student organizations.
(12) Use of Facilities. Failure to comply with University regulations and procedures for campus
events and/or use of campus facilities or grounds. Those individuals acting on behalf of an
53 | Page
organization that reserve facilities should check with the University department or office
responsible for the facility to guarantee that all procedures have been followed.
(13) Fire Safety and Sanitation
(a) Tampering with or damage to fire, life safety, or security equipment.
(b) Causing, condoning, or encouraging the creation of any situation involving
incendiary or other chemicals or substances, explosives, or fire that reasonably
may result in danger to another’s person or property.
(c) Possession or use of illegal fireworks, incendiary devices, or dangerous
explosives.
(d) Failure to properly maintain a registered student organization's facilities or
property (or surrounding property) such that a potential danger to the health and
safety of the occupants or members of the University and surrounding community
is created.
(14) Advertising.
(a) Origination or circulation of any advertising media that contains matter that
violates federal, state and/or local laws.
(b) Origination or circulation of any advertising media containing false or misleading
information.
(15) Solicitation and Fundraising. Failure to comply with applicable law and University
regulations and procedures for solicitation and fundraising activities on campus.
(16) University Wordmark Violations. Unauthorized use of the University's name,
abbreviation, trademarks or wordmarks, including the Pegasus, monograms, seal, or other
graphic identity symbols. The phrases "UCF" or "University of Central Florida" (or some form
thereof) cannot precede the title of the organization. This section refers to but is not limited to,
the registered student organization’s: domain name, web address, promotional materials, and
uniforms/shirts.
(17) Academic Misconduct
(a) Unauthorized academic assistance: Using or attempting to use unauthorized
materials, information or study aids in any academic exercise unless specifically
authorized by the instructor of record.
(b) The unauthorized possession of examination or course related material.
(c) Commercial Use of Academic Material: Selling of course material to another
person, student, and/or uploading course material to a third-party vendor without
authorization or without the express written permission of the University and the
Instructor. Course materials include but are not limited to class notes, Instructor’s
power points, tests, quizzes, labs, instruction sheets, homework, study guides,
handouts, etc.
(d) Knowingly helping any student violate academic behavior standards.
(18.) Violation of Local, State, and/or Federal Laws. Violation of any local, state and/or
federal law that may result in a felony or misdemeanor.
(19) Complicity. Complicity is any act taken with the purpose of aiding, facilitating,
promoting, or encouraging the commission of an act prohibited by the Organizational Rules of
Conduct.
54 | Page
UCF-5.013 Organization Conduct Review Process; Sanctions;
Appeals
(1) Violation Reports
(a) Alleged violations of the UCF Organizational Rules of Conduct shall be reported
in writing to the Director of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) or
designee. Incident reports can be submitted for information purposes only, for
information purposes with the requirement that the registered student organization
complete an educational activity including but not limited to an academic
integrity seminar, or to initiate the Organizational Conduct Review Process.
Upon receiving an incident report, the Director of SCAI or designee may review
relevant information and consult with relevant parties regarding the incident in
question. Where deemed necessary to protect the health and safety of any
individual, the student body, or any part of the University or its community, the
Director of SCAI or designee, upon notifying the VP of SDES or designee, may
take immediate action to resolve the situation by placing the registered student
organization on interim organizational action. Interim organizational action is not
a sanction. Interim organizational action is preliminary in nature; it is in effect
only until there is a resolution of the registered student organization conduct
matter. Interim organizational action is subject to review at a hearing within ten
(10) business days by the VP of SDES or designee to determine the status of the
interim organizational action. The outcome of an interim organizational action
hearing shall remain in effect until the final disposition of any formal charges
resulting from the circumstances of the case, unless the VP of SDES or designee
shall decide otherwise.
(b) The Director of SCAI will refer all information warranting disciplinary action and
assign the case to the appropriate staff member. SCAI will send written
notification to the chief officer of the registered student organization at their UCF
mailing address indicating the nature of the activity in question and what
Organizational Rules of Conduct were allegedly violated. The chief officer of the
registered student organization shall serve as the organization’s representative in
the organization conduct review process.
(c) Upon receipt of an incident report SCAI has six months to charge a registered
student organization with a violation of the Organizational Rules of Conduct.
SCAI may exercise discretion when applying the time provision to account for
circumstances that warrant a waiver of the six-month time limit. SCAI will waive
the six-month limit in cases involving sexual harassment, dating violence,
domestic violence, and stalking and may waive the time limit for other
extraordinary cases, as determined by the Director of SCAI or designee.
(d) A registered student organization charged with alleged violations of the
Organizational Rules of Conduct (see UCF-5.012) will receive notice to attend a
required preliminary conference with SCAI to discuss the charges. At the
preliminary conference, the registered student organization will receive
information regarding the Organizational Conduct Review Process, including the
registered student organization’s rights during the process; an opportunity to
inspect and/or review the information known at the time, and how to contact the
Student Government Judicial Advisor. At the conclusion of the conference, SCAI
55 | Page
recommends an option for resolution of the disciplinary charges. If the registered
student organization fails to attend the preliminary conference, the registered
student organization may be placed on immediate social probation until such time
the matter is resolved, and SCAI may move forward with scheduling a formal
hearing as resolution for disciplinary charges.
(e) Social probation includes but is not limited to prohibition of the following: any on
or off campus fundraisers, socials, intramural competitions, receptions, service
projects, conferences, retreats, etc. The organization may also not be able to
update its registration until such time that it appears before a hearing. Groups
under social probation may gather at regularly scheduled business meetings.
(2) Options for Resolution of Disciplinary Charges
(a) Case Dismissal: The Director of SCAI or designee may dismiss a case if it is
found to not have sufficient facts or evidence to substantiate the claim of
misconduct or the misconduct is not a violation of the Organizational Rules of
Conduct.
(b) Mediation: Depending on the nature and severity of the alleged violation, SCAI
may recommend mediation as an alternative to disciplinary action. The involved
parties must each agree to mediation. Mediation is a confidential process where
the parties voluntarily meet with an impartial mediator to communicate their
concerns and needs to each other and to reach their own agreement on the
resolution of the case. The participants in mediation are responsible for keeping
their agreement or renegotiating it, if necessary. In the event that the participants
do not agree to mediate or mediate but do not reach a full and final resolution, the
case will be referred back to SCAI for possible disciplinary action. Breach of a
mediated agreement may result in a follow up mediation session or the matter
may be referred back through the conduct process at the discretion of SCAI.
(c) Informal Resolution Conference: At the discretion of SCAI, violations found not
to warrant a formal hearing may be referred to an informal resolution conference.
SCAI shall provide timely written notice to the registered student organization of
the charges at least seven (7) business days before the informal resolution
conference. At the informal resolution conference, the charged registered student
organization has the opportunity to meet with an SCAI staff member and accept
responsibility for the charges of violation of the Organizational Rules of Conduct.
At the informal level the matter will be settled by the following outcomes:
punitive sanction (organizational warning, organizational probation,
organizational probation with restrictions, deferred organizational suspension) as
well as educational sanctions (papers, seminars, community service, etc.). If the
matter is not resolved informally, the case will be resolved through a formal
hearing. The outcomes from an informal resolution conference are final and are
not eligible to be appealed. The registered student organization will receive
written notice of the Resolution Agreement within ten (10) business days of the
conference, except in the case of extraordinary circumstances. Written notice of
the Resolution Agreement will include the determination regarding responsibility
for the conduct violations and applicable sanctions.
(d) Formal Hearing: If an alleged violation of the Organizational Rules of Conduct is
not dismissed or otherwise resolved, then SCAI shall provide timely written
notice of the charges to the registered student organization at least seven (7)
56 | Page
business days before the formal hearing. The charged registered student
organization may request either a panel or administrative hearing. The charged
registered student organization’s hearing shall only be open to the charged
registered student organization’s chief officer; the charged registered student
organizations’ advisor, advocate, or legal representative; the hearing body;
witnesses (when called upon); a representative from SCAI; a legal representative
for the university; and a university staff member from an appropriate office
(Office of Student Involvement, Office of Fraternity and Sorority Life, Recreation
and Wellness Center, etc.).
(3) Formal Hearings. There are two types of formal hearings – panel hearings and
administrative hearings.
(a) Panel Hearings.
1. A panel to consider an organizational case shall be comprised of members
from the SCAI Student Conduct Board. The panel shall consist of two (2)
faculty and administrative staff members combined and two (2) student
members that have been trained by SCAI to hear organizational cases. One
panel member shall be selected by SCAI to chair the hearing and report
the proposed finding(s) and sanction(s), if any, to the Director of SCAI or
designee.
2. At hearings conducted by a panel, a SCAI staff member shall act as an
advisor to the panel. The Director of SCAI shall receive the panel’s
proposed finding(s) as to "in violation" or "not in violation" of the
Organizational Rules of Conduct and consider any sanctions proposed by
the panel.
3. The Director of SCAI or designee may accept the proposed finding(s) of
“in violation” or “not in violation” or remand the case for rehearing. If the
Director of SCAI or designee accepts the proposed finding of “in
violation,” they may approve, mitigate, or increase the sanctions proposed
by the panel.
4. Any decision by the Director of SCAI or designee to alter sanctions or
return a case shall be accompanied by a concise and explicit written
statement that explains the basis for that decision.
(b) Administrative Hearings
1. Administrative hearings shall be conducted by a faculty or staff member
from the Student Conduct Board trained by SCAI to hear organizational
cases.
2. At hearings conducted by an administrative hearing officer, a SCAI staff
member shall act as an advisor to the administrative hearing officer. The
Director of SCAI or designee shall receive the administrative hearing
officer’s proposed finding(s) as to "in violation" or "not in violation" of
the Organizational Rules of Conduct, and consider any sanctions proposed
by the administrative hearing officer.
3. The Director of SCAI or designee may accept the proposed finding(s) of
“in violation” or “not in violation” or remand the case for rehearing. If the
Director of SCAI or designee accepts the proposed finding(s) of “in
violation,” they may approve, mitigate, or increase the sanctions proposed
by the administrative hearing officer.
57 | Page
4. Any decision by the Director of SCAI or designee to alter sanctions or
return a case shall be accompanied by a concise and explicit written
statement that explains the basis for that decision.
(c) Conduct of Formal Hearings - the following is furnished as a guide to the events
in a formal hearing. The formal hearing is recorded by the University, and no
other recordings are permitted. The recording will be made part of the official
record of the hearing.
1. Reading of charges.
2. Charged registered student organization response of “in violation” or “not
in violation.”
3. Presentation of information in support of the charges.
4. Opening statement by the charged registered student organization.
5. Questioning of the charged registered student organization by the hearing
body.
6. Presentation and questioning of witnesses in support of the charges.
7. Presentation and questioning of witnesses by the charged registered
student organization.
8. Final questions of the charged student organization by the hearing body.
9. Closing remarks by the charged registered student organization.
10. Hearing is brought to a close.
11. Registered student organization is scheduled for a meeting to discuss the
hearing body’s proposed finding(s) and recommended sanction(s), if any.
(d) Deliberations by the panel or the administrative hearing officer are not part of the
hearing and are confidential. Deliberations occur after the closure of the hearing
and are not recorded.
(e) Case Record for Formal Hearing - The case record shall consist of the following
items:
1. A copy of the formal charges in writing.
2. A recording of the formal hearing.
3. All staff memoranda submitted.
4. All items of physical or written documentation submitted, provided such
items are not returned to a rightful owner. In that case, photographs or
other facsimiles shall be made before return.
5. The Director of SCAI’s or designee’s decision.
(f) Student Conduct Board members for panel and administrative formal hearings are
selected through an annual application and interview process with the exception
of the justices from the Student Government Judicial Branch. All Student Conduct
Board members, including justices, receive annual training from SCAI. Student
Conduct Board members who serve on hearings related to allegations of sex
discrimination, including but not limited to relationship violence, sexual assault,
sex harassment, and stalking receive additional training annually.
(4) Registered Student Organization Rights during the Formal Conduct Review Process.
The following rights apply to a registered student organization disciplinary proceeding:
(a) The charged registered student organization shall be afforded written notice, at
least seven (7) business days prior to disciplinary proceeding, unless waived in
writing. Written notice may be sent to the chief student officer of the charged
58 | Page
registered student organization’s electronic and/or physical address. Written
notice shall include:
1. The name of the organization, the chief student officer’s name and
organization’s address, if applicable.
2. Date, time, and location of the disciplinary proceeding.
3. Alleged Organizational Rule of Conduct Violation(s) known at the time
the notice is sent.
4. A listing of all known witnesses that have provided, or will provide,
information against the registered student organization.
5. A description of any physical or written documentation known at the time
the notice is sent.
Provided that the required notice stated above has been given to the registered student
organization along with its student leadership or member representative(s) but the
organization failed to attend a scheduled disciplinary proceeding without providing a
satisfactory reason for the absence, the organization may be placed on immediate social
probation until such time as the organization completes the disciplinary proceeding and
any further steps in the conduct process. The organization will also not be able to update
its registration while on social probation.
(b) The registered student organization may have at their own expense and initiative,
an advisor, advocate, or legal representative to be present and who can fully
participate in the disciplinary proceeding (i.e., informal resolution conference or
formal hearing). It is the registered student organization’s responsibility to make
appropriate arrangements for an advisor, advocate, or legal representative to
attend the preliminary conference or disciplinary proceeding(s), which shall not
be delayed due to scheduling conflicts of the chosen advisor, advocate, or legal
representative. A registered student organization may consult with their advisor,
advocate, or legal representative at any time during the disciplinary proceeding(s).
This consultation must take place in a manner that does not disrupt the
proceedings. In addition, an advisor, advocate, or legal representative may not
serve as a witness during a disciplinary proceeding. A registered student
organization’s advisor must not be connected to the actual conduct case or a
related case. If the advisor, advocate, or legal representative does not adhere to
their defined role in the Organizational Conduct Review Process, they may be
removed from the disciplinary proceeding(s). The Student Government (SG)
Judicial Advisor(s) may assist the registered student organization with finding an
impartial advisor, advocate, or legal representative or may act as their advisor.
(c) All formal hearings shall be conducted on the basis that the charged registered
student organization is not in violation until the preponderance of evidence proves
otherwise, except if the registered student organization accepts responsibility for
the charge(s). The technical rules of evidence applicable to civil and criminal
cases shall not apply to the Organizational Conduct Review Process, including
during a formal hearing. The burden of proof is not on the registered student
organization charged with a violation of the Organizational Rules of Conduct. The
university has the burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that a
violation has taken place. Nothing contained in this paragraph prohibits or limits
the University in offering other forms of resolution, such as mediation or informal
resolution.
59 | Page
(d) At least five (5) business days before the disciplinary proceeding, the University
will provide the registered student organization's chief officer or designee with the
opportunity to inspect all known information related to the allegation(s), including
inculpatory and exculpatory information. Information may be presented in support
of the charged student organization. The University also has the right to review
any information the registered student organization intends to use at the
disciplinary proceeding at least five (5) business days before the disciplinary
proceeding. During a formal hearing, only such information that is determined to
be “Relevant Information” will be allowed.
(e) The University cannot compel any person serving as a witness to attend a
registered student organizational formal hearing. However, all parties to a
registered student organizational conduct formal hearing may arrange for
witnesses to voluntarily present Relevant Information during the proceeding. The
questioning of witnesses shall be facilitated by the hearing officer or panel
conducting the formal hearing.
(f) The registered student organization shall have the right to an impartial hearing
officer for the formal hearing. Prior to the commencement of the formal hearing,
the charged registered student organization shall have the opportunity to challenge
the impartiality of any member(s) of the hearing body. If the registered student
organization shows good cause for the removal of any member(s) of the hearing
body, the Associate Vice President and Dean of Students or designee will assign a
new hearing body member.
(g) The registered student organization shall not be forced to present information that
incriminates its individual members during a disciplinary proceeding. In addition,
the registered student organization has the right to remain silent in the process,
and such silence may not be used against the registered student organization. The
University is not required to postpone disciplinary proceedings pending the
outcome of any civil or criminal prosecution. The University’s student
organizational review process is not a criminal or judicial proceeding and is
designed to address violations of the Organizational Rules of Conduct; therefore,
alleged violations of the rules will be addressed independently of any outcome
imposed by or sought from a court.
(h) Should the registered student organization fail to attend the scheduled formal
hearing, the hearing will be held in the registered student organization’s absence
and the proposed findings, including any recommended sanctions, will be made
using the information available at the time of the scheduled formal hearing.
(i) The proposed finding(s), as well as the Director of SCAI’s determination, of "in
violation" or "not in violation" on the charges shall be based solely on the
information presented at the registered student organizational formal hearing.
(j) Only if the proposed finding(s) of the formal hearing body is that the registered
organization is in violation, will prior conduct history be reviewed and potentially
affect the proposed sanctioning.
(k) The final decision shall be furnished in writing to the registered student
organization within fifteen (15) business days following the hearing. Should
SCAI need additional time, the deadline can be extended by the Director of SCAI
or designee by notifying the charged organization.
(l) The registered student organization's registration status shall remain unchanged
pending the University's final decision in the matter except in cases where the VP
60 | Page
of SDES or designee determines that the safety, health, or general welfare of any
individual, or any part of the University may be involved.
(5) Additional Procedures in Cases of Sex-Based Misconduct. Where a registered student
organization is charged with sexual misconduct and other identified sex-based misconduct, the
procedures outlined in UCF-5.006(6) will apply in addition to the procedures of the Organization
Conduct Review Process.
(6) Sanctions for Registered Student Organizations
(a) Organizational Warning: An official warning that the organization's behavior is in
violation of the Organizational Rules of Conduct.
(b) Organizational Probation: A period of time during which any further violation of
the Organizational Rules of Conduct puts the registered student organization’s
status with the University in jeopardy. Restrictive conditions may also be
imposed as part of organizational probation and will vary according to the
severity of the offense. A non-exhaustive list of possible restrictive conditions can
be found on the SCAI website (scai.sdes.ucf.edu). If a registered student
organization is found “in violation” for another violation of the Organizational
Rules of Conduct while on organizational probation, more severe sanctions may
be imposed.
(c) Organizational Deferred Suspension – Organizational deferred suspension is used
for offenses found serious enough to warrant organizational suspension, but
where the specific circumstances of the case mitigate the offense or for repeated
offenses of a less serious nature. Organizational deferred suspension is a
designated period of time during which a registered student organization is given
the opportunity to demonstrate the ability to abide by the community’s
expectations of behavior articulated in the Organizational Rules of Conduct.
During an organizational deferred suspension, the registered student organization
will be officially suspended from the University, but the organizational
suspension will be deferred, meaning that the registered student organization may
continue to operate with sanction-specific restrictions. Organizational suspension
will be enforced should the registered student organization fail to complete any of
the assigned sanctions by the deadline(s) and/or for any subsequent violation of
the Organizational Rules of Conduct unless the Director of SCAI determines
otherwise in exceptional circumstances. If the registered student organization is
found in violation for any violation of the Organizational Rules of Conduct that
occurred while on deferred suspension status, including failure to complete any
assigned sanctions by the deadline(s), the registered student organization will be
suspended for a minimum of one (1) semester in addition to any educational
sanctions imposed for the subsequent violation. Registered student organizations
on organizational deferred suspension may be limited in their abilities to represent
the University in intramural sporting events, extracurricular activities, or official
functions. The duration of any organizational deferred suspension period and the
specific restrictions imposed will be determined by SCAI on a case-by-case basis.
(d) Organizational Suspension: While on organizational suspension the registered
student organization loses it University recognition and/or registration for a
temporary period of time. While an organization is suspended, it may not use
University resources or participate as an organization in any University activities
or events unless authorized in writing in advance under conditions approved by
61 | Page
the Director of SCAI or designee. Additional provisions may be assigned that
further outline University expectations while on Organizational Suspension
Status.
(e) Revocation of UCF Registration: Permanent severance of the organization's
relationship with UCF.
(f) Recommendation for Charter Revocation: An official request to a national office
that the local chapter's charter be revoked.
(g) Educational Sanctions: In conjunction with any sanction listed above, a registered
student organization found to have been in violation of any of the Organizational
Rules of Conduct will be assigned educational sanctions that are proportional to
the violation such as, but not limited to: reflective/research papers,
classes/seminars, community service, restitution, interviews, etc. If a registered
student organization has any outstanding educational sanctions at the conclusion
of organizational probation or organizational suspension, the organizational
probation or organizational suspension will remain in effect pending completion
of the educational sanctions.
(7) Appeal within the Registered Student Organization Review Process
(a) A registered student organization found in violation as a result of a hearing may
appeal the finding(s) and sanction(s) imposed. The appeal must be made in
writing to the appellate officer (VP of SDES or designee) within ten (10) business
days after the date the registered student organization was notified of the decision
by the Director of SCAI. The person designated to hear the appeal may not have
directly participated in any other proceeding related to the charged violation.
(b) Registered student organizations may appeal the finding(s) and sanction(s)
imposed on the basis of one or more of the following:
1. Irregularities in fairness and stated procedures of the hearing that
substantially affected the outcome of the hearing.
2. Discovery of new and significant information that would be likely to
change the outcome of the hearing and that was not known or could not
reasonably have been discovered and/or presented at the time of the initial
hearing.
3. The sanction(s) are extraordinarily disproportionate to the violation(s).
(c) On the appeal form, the registered student organization must state the reason(s)
for appeal, the supporting facts, and the recommended solution. This is not a re-
hearing of the conduct case. An appeal cannot be filed simply because a registered
student organization is dissatisfied with the decision. Failure to describe the
nature of the information in full detail in the appeal letter will result in the denial
of an appeal.
(d) The appellate officer shall first determine if sufficient grounds for appeal exist
and then, if so, may either deny the appeal, thus sustaining the initial decision and
sanction(s), or do one of the following:
1. If the registered student organization alleges that the sanction was
disproportionate to the violation(s) and the appellate officer finds the
sanction to be disproportionate, the appellate officer may alter the
sanction; or
2. If the registered student organization alleges that there was a defect in
procedure or new information was presented which was sufficiently
62 | Page
substantial to have affected the outcome and the appellate officer agrees,
the appellate officer will order a new hearing.
(e) The registered student organization shall receive a written decision to the appeal.
There is no definitive timeline for receiving an appeal response. It depends on
many factors including the complexity of the case and the information mentioned
in the appeal, as well as the appellate officer's appeal load at that particular time.
Decisions of the VP of SDES or designee reflect final agency action.
(f) Any decision by Appellate Officer to alter sanctions or return a case shall be
accompanied by a concise and explicit written statement that explains the basis
for that decision.
(g) If the Appellate Officer upholds the original findings, the effective date of any
disciplinary sanction(s) imposed will revert back to the date of the Director of
SCAI’s final decision letter.
(8) Community ReEngagement and Educational Development (CREED) Program
(a) The Community ReEngagement and Educational Development (CREED)
Program is designated for a registered student organization to have the
opportunity to demonstrate that in the period following the conclusion of the
Organizational Conduct Review Process, they have taken steps to become a
productive and engaged organizational member of the UCF Community.
(b) Upon completion of one semester of the Organizational Probation, Organizational
Deferred Suspension, or Organizational Suspension, and upon completion of all
educational sanctions/requirements, a registered student organization can request
modification of their organizational disciplinary status through the CREED
Program.
1. Registered student organizations that have been found in violation of an
Organizational Rule of Conduct that required an investigation by the
Office of Institutional Equity (OIE) are ineligible to apply for relief under
the CREED program.
2. Registered student organizations that have been found in violation of a
rule of conduct that had a substantially negative impact on a person or
group of people, as determined by SCAI, are ineligible to seek relief under
the CREED program.
(c) Requests must be submitted to the Director of SCAI or designee via an online
Student Organization CREED Program Submission form that can be found at
https://scai.sdes.ucf.edu/creed-program/.
(d) The CREED Program is designed for registered student organizations to have the
opportunity to demonstrate that in the period following a violation of the
Organizational Rules of Conduct, they have taken steps to become productive and
engaged members of the UCF community. Student organizations that simply
fulfill the minimum requirements of their sanction(s) will not be eligible for the
CREED Program.
(e) Upon receipt of the CREED Program form, the Director of SCAI or designee
shall conduct a preliminary review to ensure that the registered student
organization’s request meets the necessary eligibility and application
requirements. The Director of SCAI or designee must communicate the finding of
the preliminary review of the application as well as the date and time of the
“CREED review meeting” that has been scheduled for a committee to conduct a
63 | Page
review the registered student organization’s application, if applicable. The
organization has three (3) business days from when the Director of SCAI or
designee sent their preliminary findings to request an alternate date and time for
the “CREED review meeting.”
(f) Prior to this meeting, the committee will have reviewed the packet and will
prepare questions to be addressed, as well as provide the opportunity to further
discuss why the registered student organization’s organizational disciplinary
status should be altered or terminated. No alterations shall be made to include new
or increased sanctions. Should the committee feel that further information and/or
documentation is necessary in order to render a recommendation, the review may
be temporarily recessed. The registered student organization will be given ten (10)
business days to produce the information and/or documentation the committee
requested. Upon receipt of the requested information and/or documentation, the
committee will reconvene the CREED review meeting with the registered student
organization.
(g) After the meeting, the committee will issue a recommendation to the Director of
SCAI or designee. The Director of SCAI or designee will provide a final decision
to the registered student organization in writing within ten (10) business days of
receiving the recommendation.
(h) If the request is denied by the Director of SCAI or designee the decision shall
include a concise and explicit written statement that explains the basis for that
final decision.
(i) There is no appeal process for a Registered Student Organization Disciplinary CREED
Review meeting decision.
64 | Page
UCF-5.015 Student Academic Misconduct Review Process
(1) The Office of Undergraduate Studies, College of Graduate Studies, Registrar’s Office, and
the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities will review this regulation periodically.
(2) UCF is committed to a policy of honesty in academic affairs. Conduct that comprises a
breach of this policy may result in academic action and/or disciplinary action. Academic action
affects student assignments, examinations, or grades. Disciplinary action could affect student
enrollment status.
(3) Academic misconduct includes but is not limited to cheating, plagiarism, assisting another in
cheating or plagiarism, and commercial use of academic materials. Violations of academic
misconduct at the undergraduate and graduate level are listed and defined in the Rules of
Conduct (UCF-5.008).
(4) Alleged violations of the UCF Rules of Conduct (Academic Misconduct) shall be reported in
writing to the Director of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) or designee. When an
instructor becomes aware of an alleged violation of academic misconduct, the instructor must
document the alleged violation(s) through the Academic Misconduct Report Form (AMR),
available at http://scai.sdes.ucf.edu. Upon receiving an alleged violation of academic
misconduct, the Director of SCAI or designee may review relevant information and consult with
relevant parties regarding the incident in question.
(a) The Director of SCAI will refer all information warranting disciplinary action to
the SCAI. SCAI will send notification to the student indicating the nature of the
activity in question and what university rules were allegedly violated.
(b) Upon receipt of an AMR form SCAI has six months to charge a student with a
violation of academic misconduct. SCAI may exercise discretion when applying
the time provision to account for circumstances that warrant a waiver of the six-
month time limit from the date of discovery.
(c) Students charged with alleged violations of academic misconduct will receive
notice to attend a required preliminary conference with SCAI to discuss the
charges. At the preliminary conference, the purpose of this meeting is to provide
the student with information regarding the student conduct review process,
including the student’s rights during the process; an opportunity to inspect and/or
review the information known at the time, and notice of how to contact the
Student Government Judicial Advisor. At the conclusion of the conference, SCAI
will recommend an option for resolution of the academic misconduct charges.
These options are case dismissal, informal resolution conference, or academic
formal hearing. If the student fails to attend the preliminary conference, a hold
may be placed on the student’s record, preventing them from registering for future
classes until the matter is resolved, and SCAI may move forward with scheduling
a formal hearing as a resolution for disciplinary charges. Students who leave the
university or withdraw from a class before a disciplinary matter is resolved may
be prohibited from future enrollment until such time as the matter is resolved.
(5) Options for Resolution of Academic Misconduct
(a) Case Dismissal. The Director of SCAI or designee may dismiss a case if: the
reported case fails to have sufficient facts or information to substantiate the claim
of academic misconduct; or the reported violation is not seen to warrant punitive
disciplinary action; or the reported behavior reported as academic misconduct is
65 | Page
not a violation of the Rules of Conduct. An informal non-disciplinary meeting
may be held where the student may be instructed to complete an educational
requirement to demonstrate what was learned from the reported behavior. Upon
successful completion of the educational requirement, the reported incident will
be dismissed.
(b) Informal Resolution Conference. At the discretion of SCAI, violations found not
to warrant a formal hearing may be referred to an informal resolution conference.
SCAI shall provide timely written notice to the student of the charges at least
seven (7) business days before the informal resolution conference. At the informal
resolution conference, the charged student has the opportunity to meet with a
SCAI staff member or designee and accept responsibility for the charges of
violation of academic misconduct. At the informal resolution conference level,
the matter will be settled by the following outcomes: punitive sanction
(disciplinary warning, disciplinary probation, deferred disciplinary suspension) as
well as educational sanctions (papers, seminars, community service, etc.). If the
matter is not resolved informally, the case will be resolved through a formal
hearing. The outcomes from an informal resolution conference process (decision
of responsibility and recommended sanctions) are final and are not eligible for
appeal. The student will receive written notice of the Resolution Agreement
within ten (10) business days, except in extraordinary circumstances. Written
notice of the Resolution Agreement will include the determination regarding
responsibility for conduct violations and applicable sanctions.
(c) Academic Misconduct Formal Hearing. If an alleged violation of academic
misconduct is not dismissed or otherwise resolved, then SCAI shall provide
timely written notice to the student of the charges at least seven (7) business days
before the formal hearing. The charged student’s formal hearing shall be open
only to the charged student/co-charged students involved in the same incident,
selected advisor, witnesses (when called upon), the university’s legal
representative, and a representative from SCAI.
(d) Charged students in the Academic Misconduct Review Process shall be entitled to
the rights listed in 5.009(4)(a)-(h), including but not limited to timely written
notice and the right to an advisor, advocate, or legal representative who can
participate in the proceedings.
(6) Academic Misconduct Formal Hearing Process
(a) Academic Misconduct Formal Hearings. Students going through the Academic
Misconduct formal hearing process may elect an Administrative Academic
Misconduct Formal Hearing or a Panel Academic Misconduct Formal Hearing.
1. Administrative Academic Misconduct Formal Hearing
a. Administrative Academic Misconduct Formal Hearings shall be
conducted by one faculty member from the Student Conduct
Board, who will be designated as an administrative hearing officer.
b. A SCAI staff member shall act as an advisor to the administrative
hearing officer. The Director of SCAI or designee shall receive the
administrative hearing officer’s proposed finding(s) as to "in
violation" or "not in violation" of the Rules of Conduct, and
consider any punitive and/or educational sanctions proposed by the
administrative hearing officer.
66 | Page
c. The Director of SCAI or designee may accept the proposed
finding(s) of “in violation” or “not in violation” or remand the case
for rehearing. If the Director of SCAI or designee accepts the
proposed finding(s) of “in violation,” they may approve, mitigate,
or increase the sanctions proposed by the administrative hearing
officer.
d. Any decision by the Director of SCAI or designee to alter
sanctions or return a case shall be accompanied by a concise and
explicit written statement that explains the basis for that decision.
2. Academic Misconduct Panel Hearings.
a. A panel to consider an individual case shall be randomly selected
by SCAI from the Student Conduct Board and shall consist of at
least one (1) faculty member, one (1) additional faculty or
administrative staff member, and two (2) student members. One
panel member shall be selected by SCAI to chair the hearing and
report the finding(s) and recommended sanctions, if any, to the
Director of SCAI or designee.
b. A SCAI staff member shall act as an advisor to the panel. The
Director of SCAI or designee shall receive the panel’s proposed
finding(s) as to "in violation" or "not in violation" of the Rules of
Conduct, and consider any punitive or educational sanctions
proposed by the panel.
c. The Director of SCAI or designee may accept the proposed
finding(s) of “in violation” or “not in violation” or remand the case
for rehearing. If the Director of SCAI or designee accepts the
proposed finding(s) of “in violation,” they may approve, mitigate,
or increase the sanctions proposed by the panel.
d. Any decision by the Director of SCAI or designee to alter
proposed sanctions or return a case shall be accompanied by a
concise and explicit written statement that explains the basis for
that decision.
(b) Following the Academic Misconduct Formal Hearing.
1. Undergraduate students found “in violation” will be prescribed
disciplinary and educational sanctions appropriate to the findings and
recommendations. SCAI will report the outcome from the academic
misconduct hearing back to the instructor of record and department chair.
In consultation with the college dean or designee, the instructor and the
department chair will determine if further course or academic action
should be imposed. If the undergraduate program recommends further
course or program action, the undergraduate program must notify SCAI
and Academic Services. Final results of the academic misconduct hearing
and/or course or program action must be made available to the student in
writing within fifteen (15) business days following the date of the hearing.
2. Undergraduate students found “not in violation” will be notified within
fifteen (15) business days. SCAI will report the findings back to the
instructor, department chair, and college dean or designee. Students may
have proposed course or academic action removed and the instructor may
determine a new grade since no violation was found.
67 | Page
3. For graduate students found “in violation”, SCAI notifies the instructor,
Associate Dean of Graduate Studies, and the Dean or designee of the
Academic College in which the graduate student resides. The college dean
or designee will in turn notify the graduate program that a student is in
violation and ask if the program wishes to invoke any program-level
academic action(s). The student’s graduate program will determine if
program action is necessary. If deemed necessary, recommendation of
program action will be made using the Probation/Dismissal Form and/or
Conditional Retention Plan. This information will be forwarded to the
College of Graduate Studies. SCAI will be notified if the graduate
program recommends additional program action. The results of any
hearing and/or program action should be available for the student within
fifteen (15) business days.
4. For graduate students found “not in violation” of academic misconduct,
SCAI notifies the instructor, Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and the
Dean or designee of the Academic College in which the graduate student
resides. The graduate student may have their proposed course or program
action removed and the instructor may determine a new grade since no
violation was found.
(c) Appeals.
1. Undergraduate or graduate students found “in violation” as the result of an
academic misconduct formal hearing may appeal the finding(s) and
sanction(s) imposed by the Director of SCAI. The appeal must be made in
writing to the appellate officer (Provost or designee) within ten (10)
business days after the date the student was notified of the decision by the
Director of SCAI. The person designated to hear the appeal may not have
directly participated in any other proceeding related to the charged
violation. Students may appeal the finding and sanction(s) imposed on the
basis of one or more of the following:
a. Irregularities in fairness and stated procedures of the hearing that
could have affected the outcome of the hearing.
b. Discovery of new and significant information that could have
affected the outcome of the hearing and which was not known or
could not reasonably have been discovered and/or presented at the
time of the hearing.
c. The sanction(s) are extraordinarily disproportionate to the
violation(s).
2. Any decision by an appellate officer to alter sanctions or return a case
shall be accompanied by a concise and explicit written statement that
explains the basis for that decision.
3. The appellate officer should issue a written decision to the student’s
appeal within twenty (20) business days of receipt of the appeal. Should
the appellate officer require additional time for review beyond the 20
business days, the appellate officer will notify the charged student in
writing of the need for additional time. Decisions of the Provost or
designee reflect final agency action.
68 | Page
4. Any decision by the Provost or designee to alter sanctions or return a case
shall be accompanied by a concise and explicit written statement that
explains the basis for that decision.
5. Undergraduate students may appeal program sanctions imposed by the
student’s undergraduate program, per UCF-5.016. Graduate Students may
appeal program sanctions provided by the student’s graduate program, per
UCF-5.017. Students found “in violation” for academic misconduct are
not eligible for academic appeal regarding the final grade issued by the
course of the reported violation.
(7) Z Designation for Undergraduate Student Academic Misconduct
(a) A Z designation denotes a student was found “in violation” of academic
misconduct while enrolled in a course. A Z designation does not affect a
student’s grade point average.
(b) Z designations will remain on a student’s transcript if:
1. The student is found “in violation” of academic misconduct and the
punitive sanction is disciplinary suspension for one or more semesters,
disciplinary dismissal, or expulsion; or
2. The student is found “in violation” of academic misconduct twice during
their UCF academic career.
a. The punitive sanction received in either academic misconduct case
has no bearing on the Z designation being permanently placed on
the student’s transcript.
b. A Z designation will be placed in association with both courses in
which the student was found “in violation” of academic
misconduct.
(c) If a student is found “in violation” of academic misconduct a Z designation will
be placed on their transcript in association with the final course letter grade
recorded (ex. ZA, ZB, ZC, ZD, ZF).
(d) A Z designation will be denoted on the student’s transcript as a ZW if a student
withdrew from the course prior to the conclusion of the conduct process and was
subsequently found “in violation” of academic misconduct.
(e) SCAI will communicate with the Registrar’s Office to have Z designations placed
on student’s transcript following the conclusion of the Conduct Review Process.
(f) Students have the opportunity to improve the letter grade recorded in association
with a course in which they were found “in violation” of academic misconduct
through the use of grade forgiveness. The Z designation however will still remain
on the student’s transcript.
(g) A student can attempt to have a Z designation permanently removed through
participating in the Community ReEngagement and Educational Development
(CREED) Program.
(h) A Z designation will remove a student from consideration for academic awards
and honors (e.g. President’s List and Dean’s List) for the academic semester in
which the violation occurred.
69 | Page
UCF-5.016 Student Academic Appeals
(1) General Policy.
(a) This regulation applies to:
1. Undergraduate or graduate students seeking to appeal a final course grade
(individual grades on assignments, exams, etc. are not appealed by this
process).
2. Undergraduate students seeking to appeal a program decision. (Graduate
student appeals of program decisions, including termination from an
academic program or grades on thesis or dissertation, are handled in UCF-
5.017).
(b) All grade concerns must first be discussed directly with the instructor of the
course. The professional judgement exercised by an instructor in assigning a grade
or in conducting a class is excluded from the provisions of this regulation. A formal
grade appeal is limited to or more of the following reasons:
1. Alleged deviation from established and announced grading policy;
2. Alleged errors in the application of grading procedures;
3. Alleged deviation from University syllabus policy that could have impacted
the resulting grade; and
4. Alleged lowering of grades for non-academic reasons, including
discrimination.
(c) Program decisions include actions related to program or college specific
requirements. An undergraduate program appeal is limited to one or more of the
following reasons:
1. Alleged deviation from program policies or university policies applied to
the program as outlined in the Undergraduate Catalog or Undergraduate
Program Handbook(s);
2. Alleged errors in the application of program policies or procedures;
3. Alleged program probation or program dismissal due to non-academic
reasons; and
4. Alleged undergraduate program action for non-academic reasons,
including discrimination and/or sexual harassment in the undergraduate
program, department or college.
(d) If an appeal alleges discrimination, the appeal will first be referred to the Office of
Institutional Equity (https://oie.ucf.edu/). The OIE process must be concluded
before a formal grade appeal can be initiated.
70 | Page
(e) If the student is charged with a conduct violation based on alleged academic
misconduct (per UCF-5.008) that relates to the grade or program action being
appealed, the student conduct process must be completed before the student
initiates a formal grade appeal.
(f) If the student is pursuing a program appeal that relates to a grade appeal, the
grade appeal must be completed before the student initiates the program appeal.
(g) If needed, the University may extend deadlines applicable to the grade or program
appeal process for the purposes of reviewing the appeal. If extensions are made,
the new deadline will be shared in writing.
(2) For any appeal, the following assumptions are adopted:
(a) The burden of proof for a student academic appeal is on the student.
(b) Students and faculty members are entitled to a fair and timely resolution of
academic appeals.
(c) Students have access to published materials, professional advisors, and student
government to help them become familiar with and understand the procedures
for handling academic appeals. Students may consult the Golden Rule, seek advice
from an academic advisor, or consult with a student government advisor
(sga_cjus@ucf.edu) regarding the student’s rights and responsibilities with
respect to this appeal process.
(d) Faculty members and administrators have access to the materials published in the
Golden Rule and access to University staff in the Office of Student Rights and
Responsibilities (https://osrr.sdes.ucf.edu/) to help them be aware of and
understand the procedures to address academic appeals.
(e) The University as an institution and its faculty members and students are entitled
to procedures that ensure due process and the maintenance of academic
standards.
(f) All appeal communications between the student and any University personnel
must be made via a university-provided system.
1. Information regarding informal appeals should be communicated using
the UCF email account (e.g., knights.ucf.edu or ucf.edu).
2. Information regarding formal appeals are submitted using the appeal
forms and processes available at
https://academicsuccess.ucf.edu/gradeappeal/.
(3) Step 1: Resolution of Student Appeals with the Instructor or Program
(a) The appeal of final grades or an undergraduate program action must be initiated
within ninety (90) calendar days of the final grade being posted or of the
undergraduate program action being taken.
(b) All student appeals of grades or undergraduate program actions must first be
addressed by the person or program whose action is being appealed. In cases of
71 | Page
grade appeals this will be the instructor of the course and in cases of
undergraduate program actions this will be the faculty administrator (e.g.,
program director or program coordinator) of the program that enacted the action.
Henceforth, the instructor or faculty administrator are referred to as the
“Responding Party”. This attempted resolution is required before the student can
continue to the formal appeal process described in Step 2.
(c) If the issue cannot be resolved directly with the Responding Party, or if the
Responding Party is not available, the student has the right to pursue a Step 2
formal resolution at the unit level with the unit head or their designee. The “unit
head” is usually the faculty member who serves as chair of the department or
director of the school that houses the course or program.
(4) Step 2: Formal Resolution of the Student Appeal at the Unit Level
(a) To initiate the formal academic appeal, the student must submit the appropriate
appeal form and supporting documentation. The appeal form is available at
https://academicsuccess.ucf.edu/gradeappeal/. If supporting documentation
cannot be submitted online, the student must provide it to the unit head or
designee. This documentation must clearly state the reason for the appeal and
must include the resolution sought by the student.
(b) Once the appeal is received by the unit head, they or their designee will review
the appeal and supporting documentation to determine if there are grounds for
the appeal.
1. If there is not a basis for the appeal, the appeal will be dismissed, and the
unit head or designee will inform the student in writing why the appeal is
dismissed.
2. If there is a basis for the appeal, within ten (10) business days of receipt of
the appeal the unit head or designee will consult with the Responding
Party and may also ask to meet with the student.
a. If the Responding Party or student is not available to discuss or
respond to the appeal, the resolution should wait until the
Responding Party or student can respond, but not more than thirty
(30) business days.
b. In the event an immediate resolution is needed (e.g., due to
pending graduation certification) the unit head will make a decision
based on available information.
(c) Within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the appeal, or longer based on either the
Responding Party or student not being available (see above), the unit head or
designee will provide the student and the Responding Party with a written
decision.
(5) Step 3: Resolution of Student Academic Appeals at the College Level
72 | Page
(a) If the student has new information to present or can show that a procedural error
occurred in the previous steps, within ten (10) business days of the unit head or
designee’s written decision the student may submit the appeal to the dean of the
college that offers the course or program. The student will provide the information
using the processes outlined in (2)(f).
(b) The dean will delegate the appeal to an associate dean or designee who will,
within ten (10) business days of receipt, review the appeal. One of the following
actions will take place:
1. If an appeal is presented that was previously dismissed for having no basis,
and none of the new or additional information establishes a basis, then the
appeal will again be dismissed, and the associate dean or designee will
inform the student in writing why the appeal is dismissed.
2. If the student presents new or additional information that must first be
reviewed by the unit head, then the associate dean or designee will inform
the student in writing that this information must be reviewed first by the
unit head and that the student is required to revisit Step 2.
3. If the appeal warrants a review, the associate dean or designee will submit
a recommendation to the dean.
(c) If a recommendation is submitted to the dean, within five (5) business days of
receiving the associate dean or designee’s recommendation the college dean will
provide the student with a written decision on the appeal. The dean’s decision will
be sent to the student and copied to the Responding Party, the unit head, and the
appropriate dean of the undergraduate or graduate college.
(6) Step 4: Resolution of Student Academic Appeals at the University Level
(a) If the student has new information to present or can show that a procedural error
occurred in the previous steps, within ten (10) business days of the dean’s written
decision the student may submit the appeal to the dean of the college of
undergraduate studies or the dean of the graduate college. The student will
provide the information using the processes outlined in (2)(f).
(b) The university dean will review the appeal within ten (10) business days of receipt.
One of the following actions will take place:
1. If an appeal is presented that was previously dismissed for having no basis
and none of the new or additional information establishes a basis, then the
appeal will again be dismissed, and the university dean or designee will
inform the student in writing why the appeal is dismissed.
2. If the student presents new or additional information that must first be
reviewed by the college dean, then the university dean or designee will
inform the student in writing that this information must be reviewed first
by the college dean and that the student is required to revisit Step 3.
73 | Page
3. If the information presented warrants additional review, the university
dean will inform the student in writing that the appeal will be reviewed by
the Ad Hoc Student Academic Appeal Committee which will make a
recommendation to the university dean. The appeal will continue to Step
5.
(7) Step 5: Ad Hoc Student Academic Appeal Committee
(a) The committee will function as an objective, fact-finding body when examining all
available and relevant information concerning the student’s appeal of a grade or
program action by the Responding Party. Such information may include the
student’s documented appeal, written and/or oral information provided by the
student or Responding Party, statements made by both parties before the
committee, and any other information the committee may deem relevant.
(b) The committee will review the student’s appeal of the awarded grade or the
undergraduate program action and will make a recommendation to the university
dean about how the appeal will be resolved.
(c) The committee shall be made up of no more than two (2) full-time instructional
faculty members and an equal number of students. The university shall make a
reasonable effort to select students of comparable academic classification as the
student initiating the appeal. The university will select student members from a
panel of students appointed and trained by the Vice President of Student
Development and Enrollment Services and/or the Dean of the College of Graduate
Studies. The list of students appointed to the student panel shall be maintained
by the office of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (for undergraduate) or
the College of Graduate Studies (for graduate).
(d) Once the committee is convened, the committee should make reasonable efforts
to meet for review of the case within twenty (20) business days. If the committee
cannot meet within the 20 days, the university will inform the parties of the need
for additional time.
(e) The meeting is not covered by Sunshine laws, is closed to outside parties, and will
not be recorded.
1. The student and Responding Party shall be separately invited to meet with
the committee. Participating individuals in the appeal may appear through
virtual (electronic) means at the committee meeting. While either party
may invite a guest to attend the meeting, no guest may address the
committee or respond to questions.
2. The student and Responding Party shall be allowed adequate time to
respond to the appeal and material as submitted, to answer any questions
from committee members, and to present additional information needed
to clarify the issues involved.
3. Should either party fail to attend the scheduled appeal meeting, the
meeting will be held in the party’s absence with the understanding that
74 | Page
the proposed outcomes and resolutions will be made using the
information available at the time of the appeal meeting and in the party’s
absence.
(f) After meeting with both parties, the committee will deliberate and issue a
recommendation by majority vote to the university dean. If applicable, the
committee will suggest a resolution to the appeal. This decision may let the
grade/action stand as is or may alter the recommended grade/action. If the
decision of the committee is to alter a previous decision, only the faculty members
on the committee will recommend what the alteration will be; however, the
student members on the committee may participate in the discussion. The
committee chair will ensure that the committee's majority opinion, rationale, and
recommended findings and resolutions are documented and forwarded to the
university dean within five (5) days of the conclusion of the committee hearing.
(g) Within five (5) business days of receiving the committee’s recommendation, the
university dean will provide the student with a written decision on the appeal. This
decision represents final agency action. The dean’s decision will be copied to the
unit head and the dean of the college from which the appeal originated.
(8) Responsibility for Record Keeping of Formal Student Academic Appeals
(a) To support institutional compliance with the Southern Association of Colleges and
Schools Commission on Colleges’ Principles of Accreditation, the following parties
shall be responsible for maintaining complete records of all formal student
academic appeals.
1. The College of Undergraduate Studies for undergraduate-level academic
appeals; and
2. The College of Graduate Studies for graduate-level academic appeals.
(b) The complete record shall include the following components:
1. First and last name of the student filing the formal appeal or the student’s
unique UCF personal identification number,
2. Date the formal appeal was filed,
3. Final decision resulting from review of the formal appeal,
4. Date the formal appeal was determined closed, and
5. Documentation reviewed at each phase of the formal appeal process.
(c) The dean of the College of Undergraduate Studies and the dean of the College of
Graduate Studies or their respective designees shall be responsible for
monitoring formal academic appeals for patterns that may warrant broader
review in an effort to ensure the integrity of the academic enterprise and
continuous compliance with accreditation standards. At minimum, the
respective dean or designee shall conduct an annual review of the elements
75 | Page
addressed in the SACS-COC Principles of Accreditation (10)(b)1, 2, 3, and 4 and
shall consult the documentation on file for SACS-COC Principles of Accreditation
(1)(b)5 as needed to render a determination of need for broader review.
76 | Page
UCF-5.017 Appeals of Graduate Program Actions or Decisions
(1) Review of Academic Performance.
(a) The primary responsibility for monitoring a student’s progress to degree (or
program completion) rests with the graduate program, although the College of
Graduate Studies also monitors a student’s progress and takes appropriate actions
if performance standards as specified by the program and University are not
maintained. Satisfactory progress to degree (or program completion) requires an
ongoing evaluation of a student’s performance in a program as indicated by
satisfactory grades within courses, successful performance on program
competency exams, progress in thesis and dissertation research, the maintenance
of the standards of academic and professional integrity expected in a particular
discipline or program, and any other measures of progress as customarily used in
the program. Academic probation or even dismissal of the student from the
program may occur when the individual is not making satisfactory progress to
degree (or program completion).
(b) A graduate program may also recommend dismissal if the student fails to
maintain the standards of academic and professional integrity, meet or exceed the
professional competencies of the discipline, or maintain the competence necessary
for the welfare of faculty, fellow students, staff, patients, clients, or others
encountered in internships, externships, or other classes required by the degree
program. A student’s performance in clinical settings may be evaluated by clinical
supervisors or other clinicians in conjunction with instructors of record and/or
faculty advisors.
(c) A student may be immediately terminated from a clinical assignment and/or
graduate program when, in the professional judgment of a qualified clinician,
faculty supervisor or instructor of record, client/patient welfare could be at risk.
In cases where client/patient welfare could be at risk, graduate programs may
forego published procedures for advising, mentoring or probation if
documentation from clinical or faculty supervisors indicate immediate action was
necessary to protect the welfare of others. When immediate action is taken, the
graduate program must inform the student in writing of the action and the reasons
for the action. The student may appeal such action as a graduate program action
under this Regulation.
(d) Misconduct associated with research or misconduct in laboratory assignments
may result in immediate termination from the assignment and/or the graduate
program when the misconduct places clients, researchers, subjects or the
university at risk
(e) It is incumbent on the graduate program to give the student an opportunity to
discuss the pending action with the program director and provide additional
relevant information prior to making a recommendation of probation or dismissal.
A student does not have to agree with the action in order for the program to move
forward with a recommendation of probation or dismissal.
(f) The Dean of the College of Graduate Studies has final authority over probation
and dismissal recommendations and will execute them accordingly.
1. Once dismissed, a student may apply to UCF as a student in another program,
or as a non-degree student. Readmitted students are prohibited from taking
courses in the program from which they were dismissed.
77 | Page
2. A student can only be reinstated to the previous graduate program by either
submitting a new application to the program with a new admissions decision,
or through a formal grievance process. (See Grievance Procedures in
following section).
(2) Other Procedures. Graduate students disputing a graduate program action (including the
evaluation of their progress to degree) as described above, have several routes of appeal
depending on the nature of the grievance.
(a) In the appeal of a grade in a specific course (excluding thesis or dissertation credit
hours) students are referred to Regulation UCF-5.016 for the grade appeal
procedures.
(b) For issues resulting from a failure to maintain academic behavior standards such
as cheating, plagiarism, etc., students are referred to Regulation UCF 5.015 (and,
as appropriate, student conduct review procedures).
(c) Misconduct associated with research will follow procedures determined by the
Office of Research and Commercialization.
(d) All other grievances, including the appeal of grades issued in Thesis and
Dissertation credit hours, follow the Procedure for Other Grievances of Graduate
Students as outlined in this Regulation.
(3) Applicability of graduate program action appeal procedure:
(a) This regulation applies to graduate student appeals of decisions made by the
College of Graduate Studies, an academic college or graduate degree program
based on:
1. Alleged deviation from program or university policies as outlined in the
Graduate Catalog or Graduate Program Handbook(s)
2. Alleged errors in application of policies or procedures
3. Alleged probation or dismissal due to non-academic reasons
4. Alleged deviation from the University’s syllabus policy
5. Alleged discrimination and/or sexual harassment in the program, department
or college. (An appeal alleging discrimination and/or sexual harassment in
the program, department or college will be referred directly to the Office
Institutional Equity. The University is entitled to a reasonable period of time
to review allegations of discrimination contained in a graduate student
appeal, and the University may accordingly extend deadlines applicable to
the University for purposes of reviewing such allegations.)
(b) Decisions based on professional judgment of an instructor, faculty member or
clinical supervisor in the assignment of a grade or assessment of a student’s
performance in a class are excluded from the provisions of this regulation except
as noted above. Probation or dismissal due to unsatisfactory performance on
competency exams, research, or progress in thesis or dissertation research may
not be appealed based on the student’s disagreement with the professional
judgment of an instructor, faculty member or advisor. Students may appeal based
on alleged errors in process or alleged non-academic reasons.
(c) Students placed on probation or dismissed by the College of Graduate Studies for
not maintaining at least a 3.0 GPA may not appeal the academic program or
academic college’s decision to not submit a Conditional Retention Plan (CRP). A
CRP may be offered to a student when, in the discretion of the academic program,
extenuating circumstances warrant such an exception; however, graduate
programs are not obligated to provide a CRP.
78 | Page
(4) Procedure for Other Grievances of Graduate Students. Students are entitled to a fair
and timely resolution of appeals. This procedure is intended for graduate students having
complaints regarding specific actions or decisions by a faculty member, program or college,
including termination from an academic program, for reasons that are not covered in Section
2(a)-2(c) above. The graduate student is encouraged to first discuss the matter within the
academic unit of the grievance and attempt to resolve the grievance informally. The formal
procedure is as follows:
(a) Step 1 -Program and Department Level: The graduate student appealing the
decision of a program, must state the nature of the grievance in writing to the
graduate program director, including a brief narrative of the grievance, the parties
involved, and a statement of the remedy being requested. All appeals must be
submitted using the form located at https://graduatecouncil.ucf.edu/appeals-
committee. This statement must be submitted by the graduate student within six
(6) months of the notification date of the occurrence of the program action being
appealed.
(b) Dependent on the nature of the grievance, the graduate program director will in
ten business days following receipt of the grievance either make a
recommendation about the grievance to the unit head or refer the grievance to the
unit/ program graduate committee to examine the issue at their next scheduled
meeting. The unit/program graduate committee may invite the aggrieved student
and others having information about the case to attend the meeting and present
information and arguments about the grievance. If so invited, the graduate
student can have a personal advisor at the meeting, but the advisor can only
confer with the student and not participate in the committee meeting. The unit/
program graduate committee will make a recommendation about the grievance to
the graduate program director.
(c) The graduate program director will consider the input of the unit/ program
graduate committee and make a recommendation to the unit head about the
grievance. The unit head will then make a final decision about the grievance at the
program/ unit level and inform the student of the decision within ten business
days after receiving the recommendation from the graduate program director.
(d) Step 2 - College Level: Should the graduate student disagree with the decision of
the unit head, the student has ten business days to file a written appeal of the
decision with the academic college graduate coordinator (or the Dean of the
College of Graduate Studies in the case of interdisciplinary programs with no
academic college assigned to oversight of the program). It is incumbent on the
student to explain in the appeal why the unit/program decision is in error and
should be reexamined. At each appeal level, the basis for the appeal must be the
same as the original appeal or must articulate new information discovered as part
of the appeal process itself. If the basis for the appeal changes, the student will be
considered to be initiating a new appeal that must begin at the initial level of the
appeal process (and which must be timely).
(e) Dependent on the grievance, the academic college graduate coordinator will, in
ten business days following receipt of the appeal, either make a recommendation
to the college dean about the grievance or refer the grievance to the college
graduate committee to examine the issue at their next scheduled meeting. The
college graduate committee may invite the aggrieved student and others having
information about the case to attend the meeting and present information about
79 | Page
the grievance. If so invited, the graduate student can have a personal advisor at the
committee meeting, but the advisor can only confer with the student and not
participate in the committee meeting. The college graduate committee will make a
recommendation about the grievance to the college graduate coordinator.
(f) The academic college graduate coordinator after considering the input of the
college graduate committee will make a recommendation to the college dean
about the grievance. The college dean will then make the final decision about the
grievance at the academic college level, and inform the student of the decision
within ten business days after receiving the recommendation from the college
graduate coordinator.
(g) Step 3 - College of Graduate Studies Level: Should the graduate student disagree
with the decision of the academic college dean, the student has ten business days
following receipt of the college decision to file a written appeal of the decision at
the university-level with the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies. It is
incumbent on the student to explain in the appeal why the academic college
decision is in error and should be reexamined.
(h) Dependent on the appeal, the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies will within
ten business days following receipt of the appeal either make a decision about the
grievance or refer the appeal to the Appeals Subcommittee of the Graduate
Council to examine the issue at a scheduled meeting. The Appeals Subcommittee
may invite the aggrieved student as well as others having information about the
grievance to attend and present information about the grievance. If so invited, the
graduate student can have a personal advisor at the meeting, but the advisor can
only confer with the student and not participate in the committee meeting. The
Appeals Subcommittee will submit a recommendation to the Dean of the College
of Graduate Studies concerning the grievance.
(i) The Dean of the College of Graduate Studies will consider the input of the
Appeals Subcommittee of the Graduate Council and make a final decision about
the grievance for the university. There is no appeal beyond the level of Dean of
the Graduate College as this person is vested with the final authority by the
President of the University.
80 | Page
University Registrar
(1) Student Record Guidelines
Student records submitted become the property of the University and cannot be returned
to the student or released to a third party. Copies of student records will be released only
upon receipt of a written request signed by the student. Student records are stored in
paper form or are digitally scanned. Once the student has been absent from the
University for three academic years, all records are transferred to optical disk storage
and the paper copies destroyed.
(a) Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)
The procedures for protecting the confidentiality of student records are based on
state regulations and the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of
1974. FERPA affords students certain rights with respect to their education
records. They are:
1. The right to inspect and review the student’s education records within
30 days of the day the University receives a written request for access.
Students should submit to the University Registrar, dean, head of the
academic department, or other appropriate official, written requests
that identify the record(s) they desire to inspect. The University
official will make arrangements for access and notify the student of the
time and place where the records may be inspected. If the records are
not maintained by the University official to whom the request was
submitted, that official shall advise the student of the correct official to
whom the request should be addressed;
2. The right to request the amendment of the student’s education records
that the student believes are inaccurate or misleading. The student may
ask the University to amend a record that he or she believes is
inaccurate or misleading. The student should write the University
official responsible for the record, clearly identify the part of the
record to be changed, and specify why the current record is inaccurate
or misleading. If the University decides not to amend the record as
requested by the student, the University will notify the student of the
decision and advise the student of his or her right to a hearing
regarding the request for amendment. Additional information
regarding the hearing procedures will be provided to the student when
notified of the right to a hearing;
3. The right to consent to disclosures of personally identifiable
information contained in the student’s education records, except to the
extent that FERPA authorizes disclosure without consent. One
exception that permits disclosure without consent is disclosure to
school officials with legitimate educational interests. A school official
is a person employed by the University in an administrative,
supervisory, academic or research, or support staff position (including
law enforcement unit personnel and health staff); a person or company
with whom the University has contracted (such as an attorney, auditor,
or collection agent); a person serving on the Board of Trustees; or a
81 | Page
student serving on an official committee, such as a disciplinary or
grievance committee, or assisting another school official in performing
his or her tasks. A school official has a legitimate educational interest
if the official needs to review an education record in order to fulfill his
or her professional responsibility;
4. The right to file a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education
concerning alleged failures by a State University to comply with the
requirements of FERPA. The name and address of the office that
administers FERPA is:
Family Policy Compliance Office
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington DC, 20202-4605
5. Directory Information FERPA authorizes the University to classify
certain information concerning students as “directory information,”
which means that it may be released to anyone upon request. In
accordance with Florida Statutes Section 228.093, the University is
required to release student directory information to independent
vendors upon request. Directory information at UCF includes:
Name;
current mailing address;
telephone number;
e-mail address;
date of birth;
major field of study;
dates of attendance;
enrollment status;
degrees and awards received;
participation in officially registered activities and sports; and
Athlete’s height and weight.
All other student information will be released in accordance with
FERPA; in most cases this requires the student’s prior written and
signed consent. The University extends to students the opportunity to
withhold any or all information, including “directory information.” To
do this, students must complete the “Directory Disclosure/ Release
Authorization” form available at the Registrar’s Office (MH 161) or
online at http://registrar.ucf.edu, requesting that this information be
withheld. The Golden Rule outlines the University procedures for
confidentiality. For additional information describing FERPA policy,
enter the Department of Education Family Policy Compliance Office
website at http://www.ed.gov/offices/OM/fpco/.
(2) Student Communication Responsibility Policy
(a) To communicate in a more expedient manner, UCF uses e-mail as the primary
means of notifying students of important university business and information
82 | Page
dealing with registration, deadlines, financial assistance, scholarships, tuition
and fees, etc.
(b) To avoid missing important communications from the university, students must
ensure that the university has an up-to-date “preferred” e-mail address, as well
as both a permanent and mailing (local) address.
(c) It is critical that students maintain and regularly check their “preferred” e-mail
account for official announcements and notifications. Communications mailed
to a student’s “preferred” email address are considered official notice. The
university does not accept responsibility if official communication fails to reach
a student who has not notified the university of a change of e-mail or mailing
address.
(d) Please ensure that your e-mail address, as well as your permanent and mailing
(local) address and telephone number are current with the university at all times.
Students can update their contact information on the web at: http://my.ucf.edu
83 | Page
Student Health Services
(1) Drug-Free Workplace/Drug-Free Schools Policy Statement
This is a statement of the standards of conduct and disciplinary sanctions to be imposed
for the unlawful possession, use or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol by UCF
students and employees on UCF property or as part of any of its activities. The unlawful
manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a controlled substance or
the unlawful possession or use of alcohol is prohibited in and on UCF owned and
controlled property or as part of any of its activities. Any UCF employee or student
determined to have violated this policy shall be subject to disciplinary action for
misconduct, action which may include termination or expulsion and referral for criminal
prosecution. No employee or student is to report to work, class or any University
activity while under the influence of illegal drugs or alcohol. Violation of these policies
by an employee or student will be reason for evaluation and possible intervention or
treatment for alcohol and other drug abuse or dependency disorders. The University’s
alcoholic beverages policy is stated below.
(2) Campus Alcoholic Beverages Policy
(a) Policy- The sale, service, possession, and consumption of alcoholic beverages
shall comply with state and federal laws, city and county ordinances, and the
licensing agreement with on-campus distributors which allows for the sale and
service of alcoholic beverages. In addition, the University has formulated the
following policies governing the sale, service, possession, and consumption of
alcoholic beverages on campus.
(b) Guidelines- The sale or service of alcoholic beverages to persons younger than 21
years of age is prohibited.
1. Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages is prohibited by persons
younger than 21 years of age.
2. Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages in open or unsealed
containers is prohibited, except in designated areas or as approved with
special events.
3. Individuals are responsible for their actions, regardless of whether or not
their mental or physical state may be affected by mind-altering chemicals
such as alcohol and other drugs.
4. Student organizations may develop more stringent regulations regarding
alcohol use.
(c) Location- The sale of alcoholic beverages on the University campus may be
permitted only in licensed areas by licensed on-campus distributors.
1. The sale or service of alcoholic beverages to individuals of legal age will
be permitted at other select campus locations for catered functions by
properly authorized distributors.
2. The serving, possession or consumption of alcohol by individuals of legal
age may be permitted in private residential rooms in the residence halls
and other on-campus housing, unless otherwise prohibited by the
governing organization. Consumption of alcoholic beverages in public or
common areas within on-campus residential units shall follow guidelines
provided by their governing organization.
84 | Page
(d) Approval Procedure for Student Groups- Prior approvals for students or student
organizations to host an event where alcoholic beverages are present in non-
licensed campus locations must be obtained from the associate Vice President for
Campus Life or designee.
1. The following information must be supplied by the student organization
and approved by the appropriate University officials, no less than 15
calendar days prior to the event(s). The required form may be obtained
from the Office of Student Involvement. These arrangements include but
are not limited to:
a. Sponsoring organization and nature of event;
b. Date, beginning and ending times and location of event;
c. Number in attendance and method of registering guests;
d. Method of designation for those of age/underage;
e. Contained area where alcohol consumption is permitted;
f. Type of alcohol along with food and alternative non-alcoholic
beverages to be provided;
g. Method of security including number of campus police officers;
h. Person to be contacted at event in case of questions or problems.
2. When an event is properly scheduled to take place in a location for which
a campus concession holds a license, alcoholic beverages are to be sold
through the concession and their license. Groups or organizations that seek
to sell beer or wine along with a non-alcoholic choice at other locations on
campus must obtain approval to secure a beer or wine license from the
Director of Business Services prior to making application for the license.
With approval, the license is then to be obtained by the organization from
the Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco Division of the Department of
Business Regulations.
(3) Student Organizations
(a) Active registered student organizations must secure in writing permission to serve
or consume alcoholic beverages on property owned or operated by the University
of Central Florida for the purpose of engaging in any activity to benefit either
their own organization directly, or a program that their organization may sponsor,
as follows:
1. Student Union and inside the Pegasus Circle - Director of the Student
Union or designee
2. Outdoor area immediately adjacent to any building - officially designated
building manager for that facility
3. Other outdoor open spaces on the campus - designated sponsors, i.e. Lake
Claire - Director of the Recreation and Wellness Center or designee.
4. Inside any building - officially designated building manager for that
facility
(b) Permission by active registered student organizations to use any space on each
regional campus or its host institution’s campus for the purpose of providing or
consuming alcoholic beverages must be secured in writing in advance by the
Director of Campus Life on each regional campus.
(4) Drug/Alcohol Counseling, Treatment, or Rehabilitation and/or Re-entry Programs
Available to UCF Student and Employees
85 | Page
Substance Use Disorders Prevention, Treatment & Recovery Services are available at
the UCF Student Health Center. A variety of health promotion services, including
education, assessment for substance use disorders, interventions, treatment and recovery
support are provided to UCF students by clinicians at Student Health Services.
Confidential screening and assessment is available for students who are interested in feedback
regarding risk and protective factors associated with their self-reported substance use.
Student Health partners with other campus and community entities to support services
that encourage individuals and student organizations to make safer, responsible choices
that enhance their personal and academic success at UCF.
Applicable Legal Sanctions Under Federal, State and Local Law for the Unlawful
Possession or Distribution of Illicit Drugs and Alcohol
(a) In the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency 1989 edition of
Drugs and Abuse the following statement is provided regarding applicable legal
sanctions under federal law for the unlawful possession or distribution of illicit
drugs. “The foundation of the federal fight against drugs is Title II of the
Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, commonly
known as the Controlled Substance Act (CSA). The basic Provisions of that law
were strengthened by the Congress in 1984 and again with the Anti-Drug Abuse
Act of 1986. The CSA provides penalties for unlawful manufacturing,
distribution, and dispensing of controlled substances. The penalties are basically
determined by the schedule of the drug or other substance, and sometime are
specified by drug name, as in the case of marijuana. As the statute has been
amended since its initial passage in 1970, the penalties have been altered by
Congress.” Florida laws (directed to discourage persons from driving under the
influence of drugs or alcohol) have severe penalties including mandatory
minimum incarceration sentences. Other sanctions include:
Suspension or revocation of driver’s license;
Suspension of vehicle registration and return of license plates, in the case of
a multiple offender;
Mandatory blood testing to determine alcohol or drugs levels; and
Mandated assessment and counseling, and fines.
(5) Biennial Review by UCF of its Drug-Free Workplace/Drug-Free School Policy
Compliance
The Division of Student Development and Enrollment Services and Human Resources office will review,
on a biennial basis, the effectiveness of the programs stated in its Drug-Free Workplace/Drug-Free
Schools Policy Statement and will implement changes to the programs if they are needed in accordance
with the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act amendments of 1989 (Public law 101-226). This
review will also be conducted to ensure that the disciplinary sanctions stated in the UCF Policy Statement
are consistently enforced.
86 | Page
Office of Student Involvement
(1) Student Activities and Organizations
The University supports a variety of student organizations as a belief in their co-
curricular value, their role in the general education of students, and their being an asset to
the University community. Opportunities for student involvement in student organizations
include student government, academic, honorary, athletics, religious, special interests,
cultural, international and service groups. Student organizations play an important role in
the total University life and must, therefore, exercise judgment and responsibility in the
planning and implementation of their activities. This judgment and responsibility extends
to individual members and officers of organizations. Organizations and individuals must
also observe certain regulations for rational and effective operation in the University
community.
(a) Student Organizations
1. Benefits of Involvement
The University of Central Florida (UCF) recognizes the importance of
active and effective student organizations. Research clearly shows that
those students who choose to become involved in some form of organized
activity do better academically, persist through graduation, and gain
valuable career related and life skills, and experience greater personal
development when compared to those students who choose not to get
involved. These benefits are even more enhanced for those students who
take on leadership roles within student organizations.
2. The Ability to Organize
The University encourages students to organize themselves and to pursue
personal and/or professional interests. Further, the University supports the
choice to form and affiliate with an organization and strives to remove
administrative barriers that would hinder such involvement.
3. University Oversight
The University has the responsibility to exercise appropriate oversight
over student organizations and their related activities. This includes the
official registration of all student organizations through the Office of
Student Involvement as well as oversight for the appropriate time, place
and manner of all activities, events, etc. Policies and procedures related to
the conduct of student organizations are presented below.
(2) Approval and Registration of Student Organizations
(a) New Student Oganization Registration
Any student association, group, or organization other than the Student Government
Association is eligible for active registration as a registered student organization.
Approval and registration is permitted and completed upon the recommendation of
the Student Government Association, the review and concurrence of the Office of
Student Involvement, compliance with all registration requirements and the approval
of the Associate Vice President for Student Development and Enrollment Services or
designee. In order to comply with the University’s commitment to non-
discrimination, student organizations shall not discriminate in membership or
leadership on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, ability,
87 | Page
marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, genetic
information, or veteran status. Social fraternities and sororities permitted to do so by
Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972 may restrict membership on the
basis of sex and will not be denied registration on that basis. Student organizations
whose primary purpose or mission is religious which adopt eligibility criteria for
leadership positions based on religious beliefs will not be denied registration on that
basis.
1. Registration Process
To be considered for approval and registration, a student organization must
submit to the Office of Student Involvement a list of UCF student members and
their UCFID numbers, a list of all officers and their UCFID numbers, the
signature of two officers and the faculty/staff advisor(s), the organization's
constitution and completion of officer training (minimum two officers).
Proposed student organizations must have a minimum of twelve UCF student
members, exceptions to this rule can be requested and approved by the director
of the Office of Student Involvement or designee for Regional Campus
Organizations, College of Medicine Organizations, Organizations affiliated with
a National Governing Body, and Organizations classified as Graduate.
Exceptions to this rule can be requested and approved by the director of the
Office of Student Involvement or designee for Regional Campus Organizations,
College of Medicine Organizations, Organizations affiliated with a National
Governing Body, and Organizations classified as Graduate. A proposed student
organization, with a mission/purpose that appears to duplicate that of an existing
organization, may not be approved or recognized. No student organization may
be set up so that any individual benefits monetarily from its existence.
2. Privileges of Registration
Student organizations registered by the University may be granted the following
privileges:
a. The privilege to use University facilities depending on availability,
program and guidelines;
b. The privilege to request Student Government Association
activity and
service fees provided said organization adheres to the Student Body
Constitution, the Student Body Statutes, and all Student Government
financial regulations;
c. The privilege to establish dues and sponsor money-raising
projects;
d. The privilege to use the University's name as part of the
organization's name as per Organizational Rules of Conduct;
e. The privilege to invite guest speakers to campus;
f. The privilege to grant awards and honors to organization
members.
g. The privilege of access to campus for recruiting, fundraising,
and publicity;
h. The privilege of a free organizational website;
i. The privilege of access to resources provided by university
departments and offices;
j. The privilege to apply for cubicle and storage space on campus;
88 | Page
k. The privilege to program with SGA agencies;
l. The privilege to participate, as a group, in University-sponsored
events
3. In seeking, securing, and maintaining the privilege to be registered, each
student organization must agree in writing to abide by all university
policies, procedures, and regulations and to hold harmless the University
for any actions or activities of the organization. Approval and registration
of student organizations by the University shall not imply support for any
student organization’s purpose, philosophy or activities. While faculty and
staff members of the University serve in advisory capacities to student
organizations, it is presumed that students of legal adult age are adults, and
therefore, make and are accountable for their decisions and behaviors as
individuals and as members of the organization. The University will not
assume any legal liability for any student organization’s activities per
Florida Administrative Code.
(b) Re-registration and
Organizations which have been approved and wish to maintain registion with the
Office of Student Involvement shall re-register and complete officer training
annualy, based on the date of the oranization’s last registration. In addition
organizations are required to re-register within 10 school days of any change of
information for the organization (e.g. elections, officer change, advisor change)..
The report must include a current listing of the organization's membership and
officers, the signature of at least two current officers and the faculty/staff
advisor(s), and the organization’s contact information.
Complete membership and officer lists should be made available to the Office of
Student Involvement upon request. Should an organization fail to register each
fiscal year (July 1
st
through June 30), by attending Orientation and submitting an
Update Form, that organization shall be considered inactive.
(c) Inactive Organizations
Organizations that fail to re-register with in 15 months of their last registration or
fail to meet any of the other requirements listed above will be considered inactive.
Inactive organizations may only be reactivated by following the aforementioned
registration process.
(d) Constitutions
Changes made to an organization’s existing constitution must be submitted to
and approved by the Office of Student Involvement in order to take effect.
Organization are required to follow their current contsitutions in implementing
any revisions
(3) Funds and Expenditures
Complete financial statements shall be made available to the Office of Student
Involvement upon request. Registered organizations may receive operating and
programming funds from Student Government Association through an application
process. All approved Student Government Association funding will be disbursed
and expended through the Activity and Service Fee Business Office. Student
organizations receiving funds must comply with Student Government, Activity
and Service Fee Business Office, and Office of Finance and Accounting
Guidelines. In the event an organization is inactive, organizational funds shall be
89 | Page
distributed as per its constitution, but cannot be distributed to an individual or
other student organization.
(4) Membership
Membership in any student organization is limited to:
(a) Any UCF student who is paying activity and service fees and is currently
or continuously enrolled with the University of Central Florida.
(b) Any Valencia College Downtown student that meets it’s institution’s
eligibility for student organization membership, as long as the
organization’s constitution, bylaw or National Governing documents does
not prohibit it.
Organizational membership requirements must also be satisfied. UCF employees
may be non-voting members if the organization’s national constitution and by-
laws allow for it. In order to comply with the University's commitment to non-
discrimination, all students who enroll at the University will be assured equal
access to educational programs and related opportunities, including student
organizations and related programming, without regard to race, color, religion,
sex, national origin, age, ability, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity,
gender expression, and veteran status
Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972 makes an exception for social
fraternities and sororities with regard to sex for membership criteria.
(5) Student Eligibility for Leadership and Officer Positions
(a) Registered Student Organizations may not discriminate in membership or in
officer positions on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, age, ability,
marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, genetic
information, or veteran status. However, Student Organizations whose primary
purpose or mission is religious may adopt eligibility criteria for officer positions
which are consistent with those beliefs.
(b) The University has established the following minimum requirements for student
leadership and officer positions. Such positions may be elected or appointed and shall
include without limitation, only as the University deems appropriate in its sole
discretion, student government officials, officers of active registered student
organizations, members of University department- sponsored groups, and members of
University committees. Student leadership and officer positions which require current
enrollment in a specific academic program must fulfill the academic requirements of
the program in maintaining satisfactory academic progress towards degree
completion as determined by the University Registrar. These minimum requirements
may be reviewed for waiver only under extraordinary circumstances as deemed
appropriate by the University in its sole discretion.
1. During fall and spring semesters, a student leader must be currently enrolled
as an activity and service fee-paying half-time student (currently defined as
at least six (6) credit hours as an undergraduate degree- seeking student or a
post-baccalaureate student, or at least five (5) credit hours in a graduate
degree- seeking program or at least three (3) credit hours if registered for
dissertation or thesis hours). The student is not required to be enrolled during
summer term; however, the student must be continuously enrolled for the
minimum number of hours stated above during the preceding spring
semester and following fall semester. Exceptions shall be made, upon appeal,
for students in their last semester prior to graduation.
90 | Page
2. A student leader must have a minimum institutional grade point average for
their current academic career (i.e., undergraduate or graduate). This is a
grade point average of 2.5 for Undergraduate Students and 3.0 for Post-
Baccalaureate or Graduate Students, for all hours earned: a. toward UCF
classes (i.e., UCF Cumulative GPA), or b. at a previous educational
institution, if the student is in their first semester (within their current
academic career) at UCF.
3. A student leader must be in good academic and disciplinary standing,
defined as not being on academic or disciplinary probation.
4. A student leader must be free of financial or disciplinary holds on University
records. Upon notification of ineligibility, students have two (2) weeks to
gain eligibility before removal from leadership position. Students who do
not meet the above minimum requirements may submit a written appeal to
the Eligibility Appeals Board through the Office of Student Involvement
within 2 weeks from the first day of being alerted of their eligibility
delinquency by the Office of Student Involvement. The appeal should
address the causes for ineligibility and reasons for believing that the
problems have been resolved. The Eligibility Appeals Board is made up of
students (3) appointed by the Student Body President and faculty (1) and
staff (2) appointed by the Director of the OSC. The board elects their
chairperson, who votes only in case of a tie. The Eligibility Appeals Board
shall resolve the issue within four weeks. The Eligibility Appeals Board is
the deciding body that, upon hearing the appeal may waive the eligibility
requirements for that semester. Students may only be granted one appeal per
criterion every two consecutive regular semesters (fall and spring).
5. Valencia College Downtown Students that are a members of an organization
must student that meets it’s institution’s eligibility for student
organization leadership positions.
The Eligibility Appeals Board may review the academic record of students
in those positions of leadership or responsibility. The decisions of the
Eligibility Appeals Board are final.
The Student Government Association has established eligibility
requirements for selected positions within student government. These
requirements and governing procedures are presented in their election and
eligibility statutes, which are made available to any student upon request, as
well as to all candidates filing for office.
(6) Faculty or Staff Advisor
All organizations shall have a contracted UCF employee, as defined by Human
Resources, faculty or staff advisor in order to be considered for approval and
registration. The advisor has no voting rights in organizational decisions.
Additionally, a faculty or staff advisor is required in order to receive Student
Government Association funding.
(7) Event Management
(a) Event Management for Events
1. Potentially Hazardous Events/SAFE Form
91 | Page
a. This regulation applies to the holding of potentially hazardous
events on university controlled property. Excepted from this
regulation are official events which are scheduled annually in
university publications (classes, orientation, registration, etc.).
b. The provisions of this regulation are in addition to the
provisions of other University regulations and university
policies related to campus events.
c. A potentially hazardous event is defined as any activity that
could reasonably be expected to create a risk of harm to persons
or of defacement or damage to public or private property.
Examples of potentially hazardous events include, but are not
limited to: bonfires; lighting of fireworks; events involving
helicopters or other aircraft; motor vehicle races; gatherings in
excess of 400 persons, including unregistered campus athletic
events; marches (including any organized walks or runs);
parades; outdoor events involving animals; any event involving
the distribution of alcohol; and any event on Memory Mall.
d. Any event that meets the above criteria would require the
organization to complete a SAFE Form at least 15 days prior to
event date.
e. Full regulation can be found at regulations.ucf.edu
i. UCF-4.0292 Potentially Hazardous Events
(b) Responsibility
The sponsoring organization is responsible for implementation of this procedure.
1. Loud Speakers and Sound Equipment
Active registered organizations must secure in writing permission to use
amplified sound on campus (including Research Pavilion) for the
purpose of engaging in any activity to benefit either their own
organization directly or a program that their organization may sponsor,
as follows:
a. Student Union and inside the Pegasus Circle - Director of the
Student Union or designee (see Student Union Amplified Sound
Policy);
b. Outdoor area immediately adjacent to any buildingofficially
designated building manager for that facility;
c. Other outdoor open spaces on the campus - designated sponsors,
i.e., Lake Claire - Director of the Recreation and Wellness Center;
d. Inside any building - officially designated building manager for that
facility.
e. Permission by active registered student organizations to use any
space on each regional campus or its host institution’s campus for
the purpose of such fundraising must be secured in writing in
advance from the Director of Campus Life on each regional
campus. All registered student events must be in compliance with
local, state, and federal law.
2. Admission Fees
92 | Page
Student organizations wishing to charge admission to an event should
receive prior approval from the Office of Student Involvement. No
admission fees may be charged to students for activity and service fee
funded events pursuant to applicable Florida statutes.
3. Contracts
No student is permitted to represent the University as a signatory on
contracts.
4. Student Organization Contests, Campaigns, or Petitions
Any student organization sponsoring a fundraising campaign, contest,
competition or petition must register with the Office of Student
Involvement. This does not pertain to Student Government Association
elections.
(8) Campus Demonstrations and Other Outdoor Events
(a) Subject to the limitations of this and related regulations, outdoor areas of the the
University campus may be used for demonstrations and other exercises of free
speech and assembly. Such use must not interferewith the conduct of classes or
University activites and must not infringe on the rights of. All general
requirements for use of the University buildings and outdoor areas of campusset
forth in University regulations UCF-4.029, UCF-4.0292, UCF-4.0293, and UCF-
4.0294 apply to uses of University grounds under this regulation.
(b) No campus buildings, other indoor facilities, or athletic or recreational facilities
may be used for demonstrations or assemblies unless specifically permitted in
writing by the campus authority specifically responsible for the building or
facility.
(c) University organizations and University-related organizations may organize,
conduct, or participate in demonstrations and other exercises of free speech and
assembly on University grounds, except for non-common outdoor areas.All
information regarding most up-to-date policies concerning University buildings
and outdoor areas of campus are set forth in University Regulations UCF-4.029,
UCF-4.0292, UCF-4.0293, and UCF-4.0294.
(d) Non-university organizations and persons may conduct spontaneous expressive
activities, and other exercises of free speech and assembly, on outdoor areas of the
University campus that are otherwise accessible to the campus community for common
use, but must abide by the reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions set forth in
this and related University regulations (see also University Regulations UCF-4.029,
4.0292, and 4.0294), including that such use be lawful and non-disruptive. A person
making use of the outdoor areas of the University’s campus for expressive activities
does not have the right to limit access to those outdoor areas or to conduct commercial
activities in conjunction with the person’s expressive activities
Campus
demonstrations that will take the form of or involve a parade or march on
campus must follow the requirements of Regulation UCF-4.0292, “Potentially
Hazardous Events.” This is required so that necessary safety precautions can be
taken, particularly where the parade or march route will cross lanes of vehicular
or pedestrian traffic.
(9) Advertising and Signs
93 | Page
Exterior signage is allowed for students sponsored activities, clubs and events to promote
student participation.
(a) Student organizations may use exterior signs to advertise activities, clubs, and
events three times per semester.
(b) All signs must be registered and properly “stickered”. Stickers may be applied for
at the Office of Student Involvement and are issued by the director or his/her
designee. Stickers may only be issued for 5 days increments, with provisions for
renewal.
(c) A maximum of three wood signs may be posted for advertising an activity, club
or event.
(d) All signs must be removed by the posting organization within 24 hours after the
registered event or immediately after the fifth day if the signs are not renewed.
Signs not removed within the specified timeframe will be removed by Physical
Plant and a $50.00 per sign charge levied. The sign will be released after the fine
has been paid at the “Cashiers” office, and credited to the appropriate account.
(e) The placement of printed materials on vehicles, light posts, benches, trees and
exterior doors are not permitted.
(f) Signs must adhere to the following standards:
1. The maximum size of a sign is 4 feet by 8 feet.
2. Signs must be free standing and not staked into the ground or hung,
fastened or attached to shrubbery, trees, and light posts. Signs are not
permitted in any street median.
3. All signage must be placed in a minimum of 50 feet from any motor
vehicle intersection.
4. Signs can only be placed in locations designated on the UCF Signage
Location Map.
5. Any signs in violation of any of the above stated regulations will be
removed by Facilities Operations and a $50.00 per sign charge levied. The
sign will be released after the fine has been paid at the “Cashiers” office,
and credited to Account # 2421000, object code #499000.
(g) These posting rules do not apply to Student Government elections.
94 | Page
Student Union
(1) In-line Skating, Skateboarding, and Scooters Procedure
(a) Each building of the University will have properly posted signs prohibiting in-
line skating, skateboarding, and scooters within or adjacent to building
structures. The building manager is responsible for posting the signs with the
assistance of the Physical Plant.
(b) Any staff or faculty member shall discourage anyone from in-line skating,
skateboarding, or using scooters within the confines of each building or adjacent
to the property, the disruptive individual will be referred to the Division of
Student Development and Enrollment Services or Human Resources as
applicable. In the case of a person not affiliated with the University, University
Police will issue a Trespass Warning according to policy. The University Police
will assist the reporting party as necessary.
(c) This procedure applies to all hallways within University buildings and stairways
and entranceways adjacent to the exterior of each building.
(d) In-line skating, skateboarding, and scooters are prohibited on the roadways and
in parking garages/lots.
(e) The University Police Department is responsible for enforcing this procedure.
(f) Scooters used by persons with disabilities to aid in their mobility are exempt
from this policy.
(2) Solicitation on Campus
(a) General Policy
1.All business entities and all natural and legal persons (hereinafter
referred to as "Vendor(s)") wishing to solicit business or otherwise
engage in any form of commerce on the Orlando campus of the
University of Central Florida ("UCF") must coordinate such activities
through UCF's Director of Student Union or designee. The conduct of all
such activities shall be confined to that area of campus situated within the
boundaries of Pegasus Circle from Centaurus Drive to Aquarius Agora
Drive.
2.Vendors wishing to utilize the free speech area must secure permission
from the Director of Office of Student Involvement or designee.
(b) Procedure
Vendors must comply with the following guidelines to reserve and allocate
space for the conduct of solicitation: Market Day Guidelines
1.Contact UCF’s Student Union Event Services to request space. Space is
limited. Reservations must be made in advance at UCF’s Student Union
Office, Room 312. All fees for the reservation of space must be paid at
the time the reservation is made. (See Student Union Event Services for
current fee schedule.) UCF reserves the right to require any Vendor to
submit proof of insurance coverage for comprehensive and general
liability insurance in amounts deemed acceptable by UCF.
2.Placement of Vendors within the bounds of Pegasus Circle will be at the
sole discretion of UCF’s Student Union Event Services staff.
3.Vending space will be clearly designated for Vendors upon their arrival
at set up time. Displays may not extend beyond the allotted space.
95 | Page
4.UCF’s Student Union reserves the right to restrict the participation of any
Vendor or Vendors.
5.If a Vendor is not set up by 10:00 a.m., UCF may, but is not obligated to,
remove the Vendor’s equipment, if any, and will consider such Vendor a
NO SHOW. This information will be noted in Vendor’s file and could
impact future reservations.
6.The market will end promptly at 5:00 p.m. UCF’s Student Union patio
will be open to load merchandise and equipment from 5:00 p.m. - 6:00
p.m. Vendors must completely vacate UCF’s Student Union patio by
6:00 p.m.
7.In case of inclement weather, the market may be canceled at the sole
discretion of Student Union staff. If the market is canceled, reservation
fees will be refunded to UCF’s Vendors who paid the fees. No prorated
refunds will be issued if the market is held and inclement weather occurs
during the day.
8.Vendors are to purchase a parking pass on the days they will be on
campus. Parking is available in Lot T-600 after the vendor unloads the
materials and merchandise at UCF’s Student Union.
9.UCF is not responsible for any loss, theft, or damage to Vendors’
equipment or goods. Vendors are responsible for the security of their
property.
10. Vendors must adhere to the requirements established by UCF’s
Student Union for the safety of the event and any rules as may be
mandated by UCF’s Department of Environmental Health and Safety.
11. UCF shall not tolerate the placement of tables, displays, tents, or
other activities for solicitation purposes outside Pegasus Circle. UCF’s
Police will be responsible for monitoring all such activities outside
Pegasus Circle. Those violating this policy will be instructed to leave
immediately and may be issued a no-trespass warning by UCF Police.
(c) Campus Locations for Solicitation
1.Posted materials should not be fastened to or hung from shrubbery or
trees; drawn, taped, painted or otherwise displayed on sidewalks, walls,
glass and painted surfaces, or building exteriors. No holes may be dug
into the ground (except for wood stakes) nor nails or tacks hammered
into trees.
2.Solicitors and tradesmen, including students, faculty and other University
personnel, are prohibited from conducting business transactions with
individuals or organizations on campus unless a permit has been issued.
Permits to conduct such business with students and student organizations
may be issued by the Director of the Student Union or for all others by
the Director of Business Services.
(d) Exception to Policy
Officially registered, active student organizations of UCF desiring an exception to
the above policy must secure, in advance, the written permission of either the
Director of the Student Union or other individual listed below to use, free of
charge, space on UCF property to conduct a solicitation to benefit only the student
96 | Page
organization. No person or entity outside of the student organization shall
participate in the solicitation or receive any financial or other benefit or thing of
value from the solicitation. Examples of such solicitations include but are not
limited to, bake sales and similar fundraising activities, distribution of literature,
speakers, giveaway promotions, or signing of petitions. On UCF’s Orlando
campus, permission must be secured as follows:
1.Student Union and inside the Pegasus Circle and Ferrell Commons
Courtyards from the Director of the Student Union or designee.
2.Residence Halls and outside areas immediately adjacent thereto - from
the Director of Housing or designee.
3.Greek Park area from the Director of Office of Fraternity and Sorority
Life or designee.
4.UCF Arena and areas immediately adjacent thereto - from the Director of
the UCF Arena or designee.
5.Inside any other building and outside areas immediately adjacent thereto
- from the officially designated building manager of that facility or
designee (identification of the building manager for a particular facility
may be obtained from the Office of the Vice President for Administration
and Finance.
6.Recreation and Wellness Center and Intramural Sports area from the
Director of Recreation and Wellness Center.
On the regional campuses or their host institutions, permission to use space
to conduct solicitations must be secured from the Director of Campus Life
on that regional campus and, as may be required, from the appropriate
official of that host institution.
Failure of active student organizations to comply with this solicitation
policy and procedure may result in student disciplinary action taken against
such organizations, including the loss of the privilege to engage in
solicitations on UCF property, the loss of the privilege to register as a
student organization, as well as other disciplinary action.
(e) Responsibility the Associate Vice President for SDES or designee shall be
responsible for implementing this policy.