1
Eligibility Requirements for the
Minnesota Test of Academic Skills (MTAS)
The current reauthorizations of both the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) require that students with disabilities participate in statewide assessment
systems designed to hold schools accountable for the academic performance of all students.
The Individualized Education Program (IEP) team is responsible for applying the criteria outlined in this
document when determining how a student with a disability will participate in statewide testing. Under ESEA,
there is no limit on the number of students in a school or district that may be eligible to participate in an
alternate assessment.
Participation decisions must be made annually and documented in the student’s IEP. The participation decision
should be made separately for mathematics, reading and science.
The mathematics, reading and science assessment options for students served by special education are the
Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCA) and the Minnesota Test of Academic Skills (MTAS). Students take
one test per subject in the grades shown below.
Subject Grades
Mathematics 3–8 and 11
Reading 3–8 and 10
Science 5, 8 and High School
Appropriate Assessment Selection
The purpose of this document is to help IEP teams determine the most appropriate assessment option for a
student with a significant cognitive disability. These are the initial steps in the IEP team’s decision-making
process:
Consider the MCA: IEP teams must first consider student participation in the MCA, with or without
accommodations, before considering student participation in an alternate assessment.
2
Establish that the MCA is not an appropriate measure: If the IEP team establishes that the MCA is not
an appropriate measure of the student’s knowledge and skills on grade-level content standards, even
when the student is provided allowable and appropriate accommodations, the IEP team may consider
the administration of the MTAS.
Ensure access: The IEP team must ensure that the student has access to the general education
curriculum, which means the student has opportunities to actively engage in learning the content and
skills of the general education curriculum. For students participating in the MTAS, access means
instruction linked to the general education curriculum to the extent appropriate. It is likely that th
e
g
eneral education curriculum will be substantially simplified for this group of students.
MTAS Eligibility Requirements
The IEP team is responsible for making annual decisions about student participation in the statewide assessment
program. The MTAS, an alternate assessment for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities, is one
component of that program. The MTAS is designed to appropriately measure progress toward state standards
for students who meet each of the criteria listed below.
The MTAS may be appropriate for a student with a significant cognitive disability if all of the following
requirements have been met:
1. The IEP team first considered the student’s ability to access the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessmen
t
(
MCA), with or without accommodations.
2. The IEP team reviewed the student’s instructional program to ensure that the student is receiving
instruction linked to the general education curriculum to the extent appropriate. If instruction is not
linked to the general education curriculum, then the IEP team must review the student’s goals and
determine how access to the general curriculum will be provided.
3. The IEP team determined the student’s cognitive functioning to be significantly below age expectations.
The team also determined that the student’s disability has a significant impact on his or her ability to
function in multiple environments, including home, school and community.
4. The IEP team determined that the student needs explicit and intensive instruction and/or extensiv
e
supports in multiple settings to acquire, maintain and generalize academic and life skills in order to
actively participate in school, work, home and community environments.
5. The IEP team documented, in the IEP, reasons the MCA would not be an appropriate measure of the
student’s academic progress and how the student would participate in statewide testing.
The careful use of this document will help IEP teams ensure that MTAS participation decisions are not made
based on the following factors:
Student’s disability category
Placement
Participation in a separate, specialized curriculum
An expectation that the student will receive a low score on the MCA
Language, social, cultural or economic differences
Concern for accountability calculations
3
Decision-Making Process for the MTAS
Is the student receiving
instruction linked to the
general education
curriculum to the extent
appropriate?
The IEP discusses the appropriateness of the MCA, with or without accommodations,
as a measure of the student’s academic progress.
The student does not meet
requirements for participation in
the MTAS. The IEP team considers
the accommodations the student
may need to participate in the MCA.
Review the student’s goals and revise the
student’s instructional program to provide
instruction in the general curriculum that is
appropriate for the student.
The IEP team selects the MCA,
with or without accomodations.
Has the IEP team
determined that the
student’s cognitive
disability precludes his
or her participation in
the MCA?
Does the student’s
disability have a
significant impact on
his/her ability to
function in multiple
environments?
Is the student’s
cognitive functioning
significantly below
age expectations?
Does the student need
explicit and intensive
instruction and/or extensive
supports in multiple settings
to acquire, maintain and
generalize academic and life
skills?
The student is appropriately assessed with the
MTAS. Document reasons the MCA is not an
appropriate measure of academic progress for
the student and the decision to administer the
MTAS.
The student does not meet requirements for participation
in the MTAS. The IEP team considers the accommodations
the student may need to participate in the MCA.
The student does not meet requirements for
participation in the MTAS. The IEP team considers
the accommodations the student may need to
participate in the MCA.
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
4
Glossary of Alternate Assessment Terms
Access
Active engagement in learning the content and skills of the general education curriculum.
Accommodations
Changes in assessment administration such as setting, scheduling, timing, presentation format, response mode,
etc., that do not change the construct intended to be measured by the assessment or the meaning of resulting
scores. Used for equity, not advantage.
Appropriate Instruction
Instruction that (1) meets the child’s unique needs resulting from the disability and (2) allows the child to
participate and make progress in the general education curriculum.
Assistive Technology
A device or service that is used to increase, maintain or improve the functional capabilities of a student with a
disability.
Disability Category
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) specifies 13 disability categories: mental retardation, hearing
impairment (including deafness), speech or language impairment, visual impairment (including blindness),
serious emotional disturbance, orthopedic impairment, autism, traumatic brain injury, other health impairment,
specific learning disability, deaf-blindness, multiple disabilities and developmental delay.
Explicit and Intensive Instruction
During explicit instruction, skills are taught sequentially and directly. No assumptions are made about what
students might acquire on their own. Intensive instruction is most often achieved in an individual and/or small
group setting.
Extended Standards
Content standards that have been reduced in depth, breadth and complexity while maintaining the essence of
that standard.
Extensive Supports
Supports may include an array of services provided by school personnel, such as augmentative and adaptive
communication systems and assistive technology devices. Supports may be considered extensive if they require
specific instruction and ongoing teacher support.
General Education Curriculum
The body of knowledge and range of skills that all students in the state are expected to master. Minnesota
school districts determine their curriculum, which must align to the Minnesota K-12 Academic Standards.
5
Grade-Level Content Standards
Statements of the subject-specific knowledge and skills schools are expected to teach students at each grade
level.
Multiple Environments
Indicates more than one of the environments in which the student spends a typical day (i.e., home, school and
community).
Placement
Where a student with a disability will receive special education services; decided by an IEP team.
Proficiency
Level of knowledge or skills that demonstrates a mastery level of achievement. For ESEA accountability
purposes, a student who earns an achievement level of meets or exceeds the standards is considered proficient
on the Minnesota Academic Standards.
Significantly Below Age Expectations
Significantly below the average cognitive functioning of typically developing peers; determined by:
At least “two standard deviations below the mean, plus or minus one standard error of measurement”
(Minn R. 3525.1333) on a standardized norm-referenced measure of cognitive functioning; or
When formal cognitive assessments are inappropriate or invalid, other data-based measures may be
used to document functioning significantly below age expectations consistent with IDEA Sec
614(d)(1)(A)(i)(VI)(bb)
Specialized Curriculum
A curriculum differing from that for non-disabled students (e.g., a life skills curriculum).