1
Small Business Strategy
2
3
Small Business Strategy
JANUARY 2023
The esmated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $285,000 in Fiscal Years 2022 - 2023. This
includes $50,000 in expenses and $235,000 in DoD labor.
Generated on 2022Nov04 RefID: 0-1A6277B
4
Message from the Secretary
Small businesses occupy a central posion in the American economy and way of life. They account for over ninety-
nine percent of all employer rms and generate over forty-four percent of our Naon’s economic acvity. Small
businesses keep our military forces combat ready with crical parts, cung edge technology, and top-notch services,
and forfy our Defense supply chains in mes of crisis. Small businesses help ensure that our military has the very
best capabilies to keep us safe. Some of the most innovave minds in the country come from smaller companies,
and in an era of strategic compeon small businesses are one of our greatest tools.
Despite their signicance to the defense mission, the Department of Defense has yet to ulize the full potenal of
small businesses. Although the Department has met its small business prime-contracng goals for the past eight
years and has increased spending on small business prime contracng, parcipaon of small business in the defense
industrial base has declined by over forty percent in the past decade. Small businesses comprise more than seventy
percent of the companies that do business with the Department. If the Department does not work to reverse the
decline of small business contracng, then the industrial base that equips our military will weaken. Unfortunately,
small businesses encounter many challenges in working with the Department. A complex web of entry points and
intricate regulaons, as well as a trend of fewer opportunies, are pushing rms away from us at a me when we
need them urgently. The Department is determined to reduce these barriers. If we do not take acon, we risk losing
mission crical domesc capabilies, sing compeon and innovaon, and potenally weakening our supply
chains.
This Small Business Strategy outlines a Department-wide plan to harness the power of America’s small, innovave,
and agile companies and grow their contribuons to the defense mission. These iniaves will streamline eorts
across DoD in order to make it easier for small businesses to work with DoD, align small business acvies to sustain
and expand the Department’s diverse and modernized capabilies, and reduce barriers for small businesses to help
reverse the declining trend in small business suppliers. Small businesses provide our most creave entrepreneurs and
most driven workers, and it is imperave that we extend them an open hand. Through implemenng this strategy, we
will ensure that small businesses connue to serve as indispensable partners in the mission to protect our naonal
security.
Lloyd J. Ausn III
Secretary of Defense
5
Executive Summary
The United States faces unprecedented naonal
security and economic challenges. Strategic competors
seek to displace the U.S. military as the world’s
preeminent force, the COVID-19 pandemic and
impacts from climate change have exposed fragility
in crical supply chains, and consolidaon in the
defense marketplace has undermined the compeon
and innovaon needed to provide the best systems,
technologies, services, and products to support the
warghter. These vulnerabilies especially threaten
capital-strapped small businesses, which represent a
majority of prime- and sub-er defense suppliers. This
Small Business Strategy outlines strategic objecves
that will enable the Department of Defense (DoD
or the Department) to expand and strengthen its
relaonship with small businesses and beer leverage
their capabilies to help solve the Department’s and our
Naon’s most complex challenges.
It is imperave for the Department to focus on small
business. These innovave companies account for 43
percent of all high-tech jobs in the U.S. and generate
sixteen mes more patents than large rms. Small
businesses spur innovaon, represent most new
entrants into the Defense Industrial Base (DIB), and
through their growth represent the next generaon
of suppliers with increasingly diverse capabilies.
Small businesses are agile and oen can implement
change more quickly than larger rms. In Fiscal Year
(FY) 2021, small businesses made up 73 percent of all
companies that did business with DoD and 77 percent
of the research and development (R&D) companies
that did business with DoD.
1
One high-prole example
is Moderna, a former small business and Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) grant
recipient that produced millions of mRNA vaccines to
help ght the COVID-19 global pandemic. Without
small businesses, the vital engine of growth for the
United States industrial base would cease to exist.
Despite their importance to the Department, small
businesses face various obstacles in helping DoD meet
its challenges. Regulaons and business pracces
can be dicult to understand or otherwise create
barriers or increase the cost of doing business with
DoD. Larger, beer-resourced companies are beer
able to navigate these obstacles and address these
costs than smaller businesses. Some of these barriers
include confusing points of entry into defense markets,
improper bundling and consolidang of contracts, and
understanding complex regulaons. These barriers
strain the relaonship between the Department and
small businesses.
In combinaon with economic condions leading to a
consolidang DIB, these barriers have contributed to
a reducon of small businesses in the DIB. Although
the Department has achieved its small business prime
contracng goal for the past eight years, the number
of small business parcipang in the defense industrial
base has declined by over 40 percent in the past decade
(Figure 1).
2
Over me, a decline in the number of small
businesses parcipang in defense acquisions will
lead to a reducon of innovave concepts, capabilies,
quality of service and increased acquision costs.
1 DoD contract data sourced from the System for Award Management, operated by the
General Services Administraon.
2 U.S. Government Accountability Oce (GAO) Report No. GAO-22-104621 “Small Business
Contracng: Acons Needed to Implement and Monitor DoD’s Small Business Strategy”
(October 2021).
Figure 1. The Department’s contract obligaons to small businesses and the number of small businesses
that received contract awards from the Department (FY 2011 – 2020).
6
6
Through recognizing these vulnerabilies now, the
Department can respond with targeted iniaves that
leverage diverse small business suppliers to strengthen
our domesc supply chains, reduce reliance on single
or sole sources of supply, and help ensure the United
States connues to lead in innovaon. By adjusng
to macroeconomic trends and understanding that the
Department must take acon to encourage more small
businesses to work with the Department, DoD can
implement appropriate strategies to expand use of small
businesses.
Increasing small business parcipaon in defense
acquisions is crical. Expanding parcipaon will
keep DoD at the forefront of innovaon, while
simultaneously fostering increased compeon that
can reduce costs for high quality capabilies. It will also
ensure that the Department connues to leverage the
untapped potenal of disadvantaged-, women-, and
veteran-owned small businesses that have historically
been underulized. As the Department aims to maintain
the technological edge, small businesses are key.
These small business eorts are a crical part of
implemenng the Department’s broader industrial
base priories, which directly support and align with
the priories of the President. These priories include
ensuring robust domesc capacity and capabilies
to meet our naonal security challenges, promong
compeon in the procurement process to benet
from improved costs, performance, and innovaon, and
advancing equity and inclusion in defense acquision
to leverage the unique talent and ideas that come
from diverse communies from across the country.
Success of implemenng these priories relies on small
businesses being drivers to generate these outcomes.
The Department of Defense is building this Small
Business Strategy around three strategic objecves.
First, improve management pracces by sharing best
pracces and creang eciencies across the enterprise
for small business acvies and programs. Second,
ensuring that small business acvies within DoD
beer support naonal security priories. And third,
strengthening the Department’s ability to engage and
support small businesses. Implemenng this strategy
will make the DIB more innovave, resilient, and
eecve, producing a Joint Force that is beer equipped
to execute its mission.
This strategy heavily relies on the Department’s own
connued push for excellence. Numerous exisng small
business iniaves have made incredible progress in
addressing these issues. For example, the Department
of the Air Force’s Open Topic Small Business Innovaon
Research (SBIR) and the Small Business Technology
Transfer (STTR) Programs have successfully brought
rst me applicants into the DoD. This strategy seeks
to uncover similar pockets of excellence, share best
pracces, develop policy, distribute guidance, and
establish iniaves, as appropriate, to connue to
accelerate the Department’s ability to partner with and
benet from America’s small business base.
7
Strategic Objective 1: Implement a
Unied Management Approach for
Small Business Programs and Activities
The Department’s small business programs, acvies,
and workforce are distributed across the Military
Services, Defense Agencies, and eld acvies (DoD
Components), including Components of the Oce
of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). This distribuon,
although benecial in some areas, also oen leads to
confusion for small businesses as to what the entry
points are, how programs and iniaves connect to each
other, and how a small business can or should ulize
DoD’s various small business programs to mature their
capabilies from prototype to full-scale integraon or to
diversify the goods and services they provide to DoD. To
address these issues, DoD will develop and implement
a unied management structure for DoD small business
programs and acvies, develop a unied small business
professional workforce, and streamline entry points, and
improve small business access to decision makers.
3
Strategic Objective 2: Ensure the
Departments Small Business Activities
Align with National Security Priorities
Naonal security concerns are a primary force guiding
the Department’s military and defense objecves.
Accordingly, naonal security concerns should guide
the Department’s acvies with respect to the small
business industrial base. To build enduring advantages
and get the technology we need more quickly, DoD
must have access to a healthy small business industrial
base with broad capabilies to produce parts and
systems, secure supply chains, and access a skilled
workforce. Presidenal execuve orders to promote
compeon,
4
foster supply chain resiliency,
5
and
advance equity
6
also put small business at the nexus of
the naon’s economic and naonal security priories.
Aending to commercial trends is crical, as today’s
innovave companies have many choices for capital, are
not reliant on defense spending, and, therefore, have
other opons for how to do business. These trends may
lead to adverse incenves that inhibit the Department’s
ability to access America’s most innovave minds, and
potenally impacng DoD’s ability to achieve naonal
defense priories. The Department must, therefore,
take acon to ence small businesses into the defense
3 Secon 4901 of tle 10, United States Code (U.S.C.); Secon 861(b) of the William M. (Mac)
Thornberry Naonal Defense Authorizaon Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 (Public Law
116-283); Department of Defense Instrucon (DoDI) 4205.01 “DoD Small Business Programs
(SBP)” (August 2018); DoDI 5134.04 “Director of Small Business Programs (SBP)” (December
2017).
4 Execuve Order (E.O.) 14036 “Promong Compeon in the American Economy” (July
2021).
5 E.O. 14017 “America’s Supply Chains” (February 2021).
6 E.O. 13985 “Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communies Through the
Federal Government” (January 2021).
marketplace, while simultaneously taking into account
their commercial growth objecves. The Department
will ensure small business acvies are carried out to
further naonal defense priories through eorts to
stabilize and scale exisng programs that help small
technology and manufacturing businesses deliver
capabilies to the warghter, ulize data tools to
understand and expand small business parcipaon and
spending, and expand policy and process engagement of
small business professionals and senior leaders on small
business maers.
Strategic Objective 3: Strengthen the
Departments Engagement and Support
of Small Businesses
For the Department to eecvely support small
businesses, DoD must improve its ability to
meaningfully engage with small businesses including
rms from crical socioeconomic categories and
underserved communies. The Department must also
ensure that its operaonal and acquision leadership
connues to recognize the abilies of small business to
support the defense mission, and that small businesses
can understand and access the Department’s most
current iniaves, eorts, and policies. Furthermore,
DoD should provide training and other resources to
help educate small businesses and enhance their ability
to resist cyber threats, IP infringement, and foreign
ownership, control, or inuence. These eorts help
reduce the vulnerability of the DoD’s supply chain.
The Department will advance these eorts through
strategies to improve outreach and communicaon
with small businesses, provide cybersecurity training
and resources to small businesses, and educate small
businesses.
8
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Strategic Objecve 1: Implement a Unied Management Approach for Small Business Programs
and Acvies........................................................................................................................................................9
1.1. Implement a Unied Management Structure by Establishing a Group to Integrate Small Business Programs and
Acvies ..................................................................................................................................................................................................9
1.2. Train and Credenal a Unied Small Business Professional Workforce ........................................................................ 11
1.3. Streamline Entry Points and Improve Small Business Access to Decision-Makers ..................................................... 11
Implementaon acons to pursue for Strategic Objecve 1: .................................................................................................. 12
Strategic Objecve 2: Ensure the Department’s Small Business Acvies Align with Naonal
Security Priories ............................................................................................................................................ 13
2.1. Stabilize and Scale Programs that Help Small Technology and Manufacturing Businesses Deliver Capabilies to
the Warghter .................................................................................................................................................................................... 13
2.2. Ulize Data Tools to Understand and Expand Small Business Parcipaon and Spending in Order to Ensure a
Robust and Resilient Industrial Base .............................................................................................................................................. 15
2.3. Expand Policy and Process Engagement of Small Business Professionals and Senior Leaders on Small Business
Maers ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16
Implementaon acons to pursue for Strategic Objecve 2: .................................................................................................. 18
Strategic Objecve 3: Strengthen the Department’s Engagement and Support of Small
Businesses ......................................................................................................................................................... 19
3.1. Improve Outreach and Communicaons with Small Businesses .................................................................................... 19
3.2. Provide Cybersecurity Training and Resources to Small Businesses .............................................................................. 20
3.3. Educate Small Businesses on Risks of Foreign Ownership, Control, and Inuence .................................................... 21
Implementaon acons to pursue for Strategic Objecve 3: .................................................................................................. 22
9
Strategic Objective 1:
Implement a Unied
Management Approach for
Small Business Programs and
Activities
There is a rich diversity of small business programs
and related eorts distributed throughout the
Department. As a result, it can be confusing for both
industry and government personnel to understand
how to engage with the Department’s small business
enterprise. Small businesses and even members of
the DoD acquision workforce can nd it challenging
to understand where to go rst and who to contact
to nd informaon on available DoD small business
programs and opportunies. Addionally, DoD small
business oces, programs, and iniaves oen
have limited connecvity to each other and have
potenally overlapping responsibilies. To address these
challenges, this Small Business Strategy focuses on:
(1) increasing collaboraon across DoD small business
programs and related eorts though implementaon
of a unied management approach, (2) increasing the
training and educaon of the small business workforce,
and (3) using digital tools to lower barriers of entry and
reduce the search costs for government and industry
to access the DoD small business enterprise. The intent
of these eorts is to reduce confusion and increase the
overall eecveness of small businesses in furthering
the objectives of the Department.
1.1. Implement a Unified Management
Structure by Establishing a Group to Integrate
Small Business Programs and Activities
The execuon of small business programs within
OSD is split among dierent program oces within
the Oces of the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquision and Sustainment (USD(A&S)) and the Under
Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering
(USD(R&E)) stemming from the organizaonal division
of the Oce of the former Under Secretary of Defense
for Acquision, Technology, and Logiscs (Figure 2).
These divisions are also mirrored within some DoD
Components. As a result, responsibilies and resources
related to these various small business acvies are
also fragmented among mulple organizaons and
may not be fully matched to mission responsibilies.
These divisions interfere with DoD’s ability to easily
and eciently leverage economies of scale and
ensure alignment of small business eorts across the
Department.
The Department understands the importance of
implemenng a unied management approach that
will beer align and integrate small business programs
and related eorts by improving synergies, enabling
long-term program planning, beer dening roles and
responsibilies of small business professionals, and
leveraging resources more eecvely. To establish a
unied small business management structure under this
unied management approach, the Department will
establish a small business integraon group, chaired
by the Director of the DoD Oce of Small Business
Programs (OSBP), who serves as the principal advisor
to the USD(A&S) and the Secretary of Defense on
small business maers and is the principal proponent
within OSD for execung naonal and DoD policy
regarding DoD’s small business programs. This
integraon group will include representaves from
the Oce of the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquision and Sustainment (OUSD(A&S)), the Oce
of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and
Engineering (OUSD(R&E)), the Directors of OSBPs for
the DoD Components, who serve as the principal small
business leads in their respecve organizaons and
who report to the Component head or deputy, and
representaves of other industrial base programs as
needed.
7
The small business integraon group will work
to improve alignment between the Department’s small
business programs by creang a forum for discussion,
7 See 15 U.S.C. § 644; 10 U.S.C. §§ 7024, 8028, and 9024; DoDI 4205.01 “DoD Small Business
Programs (SBP)” (August 2018); Defense Federal Acquision Regulaon Supplement (DFARS)
secon 219.201(c).
Figure 2. Current Organizaonal Alignment of Key DoD Programs and
Iniaves that Interface with Small Businesses
UNDER
SECRETARY
OF DEFENSE
FOR A&S
DEPUTY
UNDER
SECRETARY OF
DEFENSE FOR
A&S
ASSISTANT
SECRETARY OF
DEFENSE
(INDUSTRIAL
BASE POLICY)
DIRECTOR,
OFFICE OF
SMALL BUSINESS
PROGRAMS
PTAPMPP
UNDER
SECRETARY
OF DEFENSE
FOR R&E
DEPUTY
CHIEF
TECHNOLOGY
OFFICER FOR
SCIENCE &
TECH
DEFENSE
INNOVATION
UNIT
DIRECTOR OF
SMALL
BUSINESS & TECH
PARTNERSHIPS
RIF
NSIN
SBIR
10
10
collaboraon, and deliberaon. The group will host
regular meengs to discuss small business programs
and acvies throughout the Department and will
address such topics as the unicaon of small business
policy, acquision workforce development, transioning
emerging capabilies into programs of record and
elded systems, and reducing barriers to entry into
the defense marketplace for small businesses. Secon
4901 of tle 10, United States Code (U.S.C.), requires
DoD to ensure there is a unied management structure
for small business programs. In its assessment of the
Mentor-Protégé Program (MPP), the Defense Business
Board emphasized this point and recommended the
Department “consider designang a specic oce,
with sucient resourcing and appropriate leadership,
to oversee all its small business programs.
8
A primary
strategic goal of this Small Business Strategy is to
establish a management structure that aligns small
business programs and small business-related eorts
across the Department. As detailed in the following
paragraphs, DoD has an incredible diversity of small
business programs and related eorts, many of which
are highly collaborave within themselves (e.g., the
DoD SBIR/STTR program with the Military Services’
SBIR/STTR programs), but all of which can benet from
collaboraon across eorts and programs. Implemenng
a unied approach that focuses on those acvies
that underpin all small business programs and eorts,
including small business policy development and
oversight, small business workforce management and
collaboraon, and making small business opportunies
more accessible, would facilitate cross pollinaon
of both issues and potenal soluons to increase
the eecveness of the enre DoD small business
enterprise.
The Department generally carries out three types of
small business programs. Although these programs
are categorized independently for the purposes of
oversight, most have cross-cung elements and
acvies and depend on eecve execuon across
categories (e.g., the SBIR/STTR program is a small
business program with an R&D focus that also conducts
outreach and training).
The rst type are parcipaon programs for small
business categories, including small businesses, Small
Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs), women-owned small
businesses (WOSBs), Historically Underulized Business
Zone (HUBZone) small businesses, and Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs), and other
categories, including the Indian Incenve Program (IIP).
Small business category parcipaon programs typically
employ spend goals, set-asides, or other acquision
preferences.
8 United States Code, 10 U.S.C. 4901; William M. (Mac) Thornberry Naonal Defense
Authorizaon Act for Fiscal Year 2021, Public Law 116-283, Secon 861(b), 10 U.S.C. 4901 note.
January 2021.
† APEX is the procurement technical assistance program operang under 10 U.S.C. chapter
388. The Department recently retled this program “APEX” and retled the parcipang
eligible enes who provide procurement technical assistance as part of this program as “APEX
Accelerators”.
The second type are small business technology
development, funding, and assistance programs, including
SBIR/STTR, the Defense Research and Development
(R&D) Rapid Innovaon Program (also known as the Rapid
Innovaon Fund (RIF)), and the DoD Mentor-Protégé
Program (MPP). Some of these programs, e.g., SBIR/STTR,
also have statutory acquision preferences and goals.
The third type are outreach, counseling, and industry
training programs, including APEX
(previously named
Procurement Technical Assistance Program), DoD eorts
in connecon with secon 1644 of the Naonal Defense
Authorizaon Act (NDAA) for FY 2019 which requires
disseminaon of cybersecurity resources, self-assessments,
and training, and various small business iniaves
for matchmaking, training, and navigang regulatory
requirements.
The Department carries out several other programs
and eorts at both the DoD and Service level that have
special focus, preferences, ulity, or priories for small
businesses.
Proacvely aligning these programs and eorts to work
together will broaden outreach, drive prototyping,
strengthen the DoD supply chain, and increase
technology transfer into defense programs, thus is
crical to engaging small businesses and increasing their
contribuons to defense priories. The small business
integraon group will focus on increasing collaboraon
so the Department’s small business programs and
related eorts can beer leverage each other’s
experse to grow small businesses in the naonal
technology and industrial base, aract more companies,
mature technologies, and allow for more rapid tech
transfer and commercializaon. This approach will
facilitate development of an easy-to-understand
pathway for industry so that a small business could
enter the supply chain through parcipaon in a
targeted outreach eort, such as hackathon or pitch
11
event, become a protégé rm to a successful mentor
to obtain business development support, engage their
local APEX Accelerator to get counseling and idenfy
contracng opportunies, compete for an SBIR or STTR
contract, and commercialize their technology with DoD
through support from RIF with help from small business
acquision preferences.
1.2. Train and Credential a Unied Small
Business Professional Workforce
Training the Department’s acquision workforce on
small business maers is a priority for senior acquision
leadership across the Department. An acquision
workforce with small business training increases the
Department’s ability to leverage small business specic
programs and authories for a wide variety of small
businesses to meet current mission objecves and
access crical innovave technologies, agile soluons,
and value-added improvements needed to develop and
advance warghter capability and infrastructure.
DoD has specially trained small business professionals
across the Department that contribute at all stages of
the acquision process to raise the visibility of small
business contribuons, capabilies, and experse. These
small business professionals assist acquision teams
with requirements generaon, solicitaon preparaon,
acquision strategy and plans, and other required
documentaon to ensure that appropriate priories
are given to small businesses, including non-tradional
small businesses and small businesses who are eligible
for acquision preferences. Small business professionals
conduct outreach to small businesses, large businesses,
nonprots, and academic instuons to facilitate strong
relaonships between the government stakeholders
and the small business community. They also assist
with market research and raise the visibility of how a
certain industry sector can contribute to all phases of
the acquision process. Small business professionals
execute and support small business programs, such as
the DoD MPP and SBIR/STTR programs, and advise on
small business preferences, priories, instruments, and
acvies of other DoD small business programs.
It is imperave that small business professionals
connue to parcipate in acquision strategy
development and peer reviews when appropriate.
This parcipaon supports idencaon of
commercializaon opportunies in future procurements
from programs such as SBIR, STTR, RIF and others and
increasing awareness for creang small business acvity
in consolidated acquisions. Although contracng
ocers are responsible for ensuring compliance
with acquision requirements for small business
parcipaon, the involvement of small business
professionals helps ensure that small business soluons
for defense missions are fully considered at the prime
and subcontracng levels and that the Department is
not overpaying for duplicave development, excessive
overhead, or unnecessary product or service oerings.
With the broad set of roles that small business
professionals play, they should be trained as a
professional community to ensure that small businesses
have the maximum praccal opportunity to parcipate
in DoD acquision and programs. Further investments
in small business training for the acquision workforce
would support and enhance the ability of the acquision
workforce to support small business.
1.3. Streamline Entry Points and Improve
Small Business Access to Decision-Makers
Small businesses today face a myriad of entry points
into the defense marketplace that are scaered
throughout the DoD Components. These entry points
are of varying quality, and the processes can be
confusing—an unnecessary challenge for a business that
is trying to understand where to go rst, who to contact,
and where to nd informaon on available programs
and opportunies. In addion, the Department also
ulizes a variety of procurement and non-procurement
instruments, such as contracts, grants, cooperave
agreements, Other Transacon Authories (OTAs), and
Cooperave Research and Development Agreements
(CRADAs), among others, each of which has dierent
qualicaon, compeon, and publicaon requirements.
DoD small business oces also receive unsolicited
proposals and capability statements and refer them to
appropriate contracng ocers and acquision program
managers for consideraon as appropriate.
With the many dierent opportunies and opons
available to small businesses, partnering with the
Department results in high search costs (i.e., takes
signicant me that many businesses do not have)
even for those companies with which the Department
has worked in the past, and an even higher cost for
new entrants. Small businesses are seeking help. In
accordance with 10 U.S.C. § 4901, DoD will ensure clear
idencaon of points of entry into the defense market
and ensure small businesses are able to have access to
program managers, contracng ocers, and end users,
to the extent necessary to inform these persons of
emerging and exisng small business capabilies.
The Department must priorize reducing barriers to
entry and high search costs for small businesses. A
focused strategic communicaons plan and outreach
will be a key objecve of this eort to address this
external confusion. The communicaons plan will
support the DoD Components and be targeted for
small businesses across the DIB to highlight market
12
opportunies and provide clear informaon on
opportunies for small businesses to engage with DoD,
including guidance on pernent business processes.
This outreach framework will center on beer educang
small businesses on doing business with the DoD,
improving DoD support to small business to meet
acquision requirements processes, and providing
mely guidance for outreach communicaons to small
businesses. The goal is to increase the amount of small
business parcipaon across DoD.
As a rst step, the DoD is turning its current small
business website (www.business.defense.gov) into
a common entry point for small businesses. The
Department will improve the informaon and resources
on this site to enable small businesses to navigate
small business oces through the Department, cross-
reference informaon on small business programs
across the Department, and provide access to available
acquision forecasts and toolkits on how to do business
with the DoD. In addion, DoD will explore enhancing
the funconality of these websites to provide for
referral of small business capability informaon to end
users and decision-makers.
Implementaon acons to pursue for Strategic
Objecve 1:
1.1.1. Establish a group to integrate small business
programs and across the Department.
1.1.2. Enhance guidance on how DoD acquision
professionals can beer ulize a variety of tools to
simplify entry into the DoD market and aract non-
tradional, emerging, and innovave small businesses.
1.2.1. Establish and implement a common training
for all small business professionals and appropriate
elements of the broader acquision workforce that
includes training on the Department’s small business
programs, best pracces from government and industry
in small business, market research, acquision policy,
and building resilient supply chains, all of which will help
build a clearly dened pipeline of talent into the small
business workforce.
1.2.2. Ensure that Defense Acquision University
(DAU) content and other training on small business
programs, authories, and tools are easily accessible for
all members of the acquision workforce.
1.3.1. Streamline entry points into the defense
marketplace for small businesses by unifying and
improving the small business websites such that all small
businesses, including those in dened socioeconomic
categories, have maximum opportunies to parcipate
in DoD programs.
13
Strategic Objective 2: Ensure
the Departments Small
Business Activities Align with
National Security Priorities
Today, our Naon and our allies face strategic
competors and adversaries ranging from
technologically-advanced competors to nuclear-
aspiring powers to non-state actors. In this environment,
the Department must be able to develop and eld
a broad range of high-quality, technically ready, and
diverse capabilies. Capability development, producon,
and elding should be marked by adaptability, diversity,
and speed of design and delivery and then sustained
and supported through reliable logiscs.
To acquire such capabilies at the volume and speed
of relevance, the DoD needs access to a strong and
growing industrial base, to include a vital and thriving
small business ecosystem. To ensure the Department
has the small business ecosystem it needs, this
strategic objecve focuses on: (1) stabilizing and
scaling technology- and manufacturing-related small
business programs and related eorts; (2) beer ulizing
data tools to ensure small business capabilies are
understood by the capability development enterprise;
and (3) ensuring small business professionals engage
early in acquision strategy development to increase
connecon of small business technologies to mission
requirements.
Strategic Objective 2: Ensure
the Departments Small
2.1. Stabilize and Scale Programs that Help
Small Technology and Manufacturing
Businesses Deliver Capabilities to the
Warghter
American small businesses have always been a great
source of innovaon for the Department. Domesc
innovave small businesses provide outsized,
asymmetric, technological advantages that are crical
towards maintaining our edge against near-peer
competors. Agile and innovave small businesses are
integral to addressing new and connuing naonal and
economic security.
Under 10 U.S.C. § 638, DoD and the Military
Departments are required to set goals on small business
parcipaon in RDT&E eorts. The Department funds
small business RDT&E in various ways. For example,
DoD’s SBIR/STTR programs provide signicant (nearly
~$2B) in total funding to small innovave companies.
The Department also ulizes other small business
programs, like the MPP and RIF, as well as other non-
small business industrial base programs, like NSIC,
ManTech, and IBAS, to help innovave companies
traverse the gap between proof of concept and market
availability. Each industrial base program focuses on
a specic segment of the DIB and certain technology
maturaon levels. The Department’s small business
RDT&E eorts could be further enhanced by increasing
integraon between technology programs. For example,
enhancing the ability of military academies and other
14
Directors now must consult with appropriate agency
personnel to assist small businesses parcipang in
a SBIR/STTR program with researching applicable
solicitaons to market the resulng research to
support SBIR/STTR Phase III transions. Fullling these
consulng dues will provide opportunies to ensure
all have a clear and concise understanding of what may
be needed to help small businesses bridge the gap
to obtaining a DoD contract award, but guidance sll
needs to be implemented. DoD’s ability to transion
technologies from small businesses into defense
capabilies will depend heavily on the successful
translaon of the unique value of small business
programs and related-eorts to a wider set of present
and future government stakeholders.
A potenal strategy for stabilizing and scaling the
Department’s innovave small business programs
and related eorts is by emulang the work of
the Technology Transion and Commercializaon
Community of Pracce (TTAC CoP). The TTAC CoP
brought together several technology and manufacturing
programs together to coordinate and collecvely tackle
the Department’s most crical technology challenges.
This iniave helped the Department break silos
between these separate programs, so that they could
leverage each other’s focus areas and best pracces
and see how regulaons, policy, and procedures can
be changed to reduce red tape while sll achieving
program goals. These funcons may be carried out
through the small business integraon group, in
coordinaon with appropriate overarching governance
bodies, would encourage development of more rapid
acquision strategies and may aract more commercial
companies whose technologies can be leveraged by the
Department.
The Department could also look at sharing best
pracces to help stabilize and scale innovave
programs. For example, through use of OTAs, DoD has
been successful at establishing agreement structures
that support new entrants and small commercial
companies, many of which are small businesses. This
is parcularly true for use of the prototyping OTA,
where signicant small business parcipaon is one
of the enabling condions. DoD policy is that a fair
proporon of DoD total purchases, contracts, and
other agreements for property and services be placed
with small businesses.
10
Improving current guidance
and reporng systems to facilitate idencaon
and tracking of small business parcipaon in OTs
would enable the Department to beer assess the
eecveness of DoD’s use of OTAs in connecon with
engagement with small business innovators.
10 DoDI 4205.01, “DoD Small Business Programs” (August 2018).
research organizaons to serve as research instuon
partners for small businesses under the STTR program
would further align small business RDT&E with naonal
defense.
However, implementaon problems persist in both:
(1) the instability of certain programs and related
eorts themselves, many of which do not have
permanence, and (2) the need to align the programs
to ensure technological investments can be scaled
into producon. This Small Business Strategy seeks to
stabilize and align these programs.
First, one of the most signicant challenges with small
business programs and related eorts is long-term
planning. Instability makes it challenging for industry
to make the investments needed to support defense
priories. It also makes it exceedingly dicult for the
Department to engage in long-term planning for how
to aract new entrants and provide dened contracng
opportunies for small businesses looking to break into
the defense marketplace. Examples include:
The MPP was rst authorized in the NDAA for FY 1991
and received seven-year reauthorizaon in the NDAA for
FY 2020; however, inconsistency in availability of MPP
appropriaons makes it dicult to scale the program
to reach the hundreds or thousands that can use such
assistance.
The SBIR and STTR programs have been reauthorized
numerous mes since their creaon, most recently in
September 2022. However, these reauthorizaons usually
occur in the last year of the current authorizaon and are
me-limited; the recent reauthorizaon lapses in 2025.
The RIF program was created in 2011 and made
permanent in 2016. The Department completed a study
that idened its successes in helping bridge the valley
of death and delivering technologies to the warghter.
9
However, RIF funding has not been appropriated since FY
2019.
These technology and manufacturing programs can
be highly impacul for the small business industrial
base, but the lack of permanency of authorizaon and
funding makes it extremely dicult to engage in the
needed long-term planning to leverage and scale these
programs to support the defense mission.
Second, many small business programs could be beer
assisted through integraon across programs. For
example, the SBIR/STTR Phase III construct allows
small businesses to be awarded follow-on producon
contracts quickly by removing the compeon
requirement as appropriate and authorized. However,
DoD program guidance and processes are oen Military
Service-based, and may be poorly understood outside
of those who work closely with the SBIR program.
Under 15 U.S.C. § 644(k)(21), however, Small Business
9 The Small Business and Technology Partnership Oce, “Defense Rapid Innovaon Fund: An
Assessment of RIF Eecveness FY 2011-2016” (August 2020).
15
2.2. Utilize Data Tools to Understand and
Expand Small Business Participation and
Spending in Order to Ensure a Robust and
Resilient Industrial Base
As outlined in Execuve Orders No. 14005, “Ensuring
the Future Is Made in All of America by All of America’s
Workers,
11
No. 14036, “Promong Compeon in
the American Economy,
12
and No. 14017 “America’s
Supply Chains,
13
as well as the 100-Day White House
Review on “Building Resilient Supply Chains, Revitalizing
American Manufacturing, and Fostering Broad-Based
Growth,
14
the industrial base and supply chains of the
United States have been declining in recent years. Slim
margins, increased oshoring, business consolidaon,
and inadequate investment in certain industrial
sectors are weakening the industrial base. A weakened
American industrial base and supply chain threatens
both the economic security of millions of Americans and
our country’s naonal security.
To meet ancipated and unancipated challenges
with speed and eciency, the Department must focus
on reinvigorang innovave and resilient industrial
base and supply chains. Execuve Order No. 13985,
Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved
Communies Through the Federal Government,
15
and the Oce of Management and Budget (OMB)
Memorandum M-22-03, “Advancing Equity in Federal
Procurement,
16
make plain our supply chains suer
from equity gaps, and that rebuilding our industrial base
requires increasing the number of new small business
entrants and advancing equity for small businesses from
underserved communies, including SDBs, WOSBs,
HUBZone SBs, and SDVOSBs. The Department is
fully commied to eliminang gaps, vulnerabilies,
and crical shoralls in America’s supply chains in an
equitable manner.
To that end, the Department is planning to eld a robust
set of tools that DoD ocials can ulize to increase the
eciency of small business market research, track small
business performance, and run comparave analycs
using data sourced from across the Department and
Federal government. Idenfying capable small business
suppliers through market intelligence data is key to
increasing set-asides for small business compeon,
understanding the supply chain, locang small business
manufacturers, and increasing the number of small
companies in the DIB. The Department has idened
11 The White House. Execuve Order 14005, Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by
All of America’s Workers, January 2021.
12 E.O. 14036, “Promong Compeon in the American Economy” (July 2021).
13 E.O. 14017, “America’s Supply Chain” (February 2021).
14 The White House, “Building Resilient Supply Chains, Revitalizing American Manufacturing,
and Fostering Broad-Based Growth: 100-Day Reviews under Execuve Order 14017” (June
2021).
15 E.O 13985, “Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communies Through
the Federal Government” (January 2021).
16 OMB Memorandum M-22-03, “Advancing Equity in Federal Procurement” (December
2021).
its modernizaon priority areas, which include arcial
intelligence, cybersecurity, and renewable energy
generaon and storage, and also has idened priority
industrial base sectors such as casngs and forgings,
strategic and crical materials, and energy storage and
baeries. Market intelligence tools can help idenfy
small business suppliers in these sectors of the federal
government marketplace that can support DoD
requirements in these areas, and help DoD expand its
market knowledge of key players in these advanced and
emerging industries.
Data analycs is crucial for connual and eecve
measurement of performance and idencaon of
trends, including the achievement of Presidenal
industrial base priories, DoD’s increased SDB goals
negoated with SBA, and major accomplishments
and interacons involving small businesses and the
Department.
17
Improved data analycs would also
beer enable the Department to track small business
parcipaon and trends across North American Industry
Classicaon System (NAICS) Codes and Product and
Service Codes (PSC) that t into priority areas of the
Department’s research, development, and operaonal
missions.
17 OMB Memorandum M-22-03, “Advancing Equity in Federal Procurement” (December
2021). 
16
2.3. Expand Policy and Process Engagement
of Small Business Professionals and Senior
Leaders on Small Business Matters
Streamlining the acquision process where praccable
and ensuring consistent implementaon of procurement
policies is essenal to migang obstacles to growth
and increasing the amount of small businesses working
with the Department. Small business capabilies should
be considered at the earliest stages of acquision to
maximize opportunies for small businesses to compete
and parcipate for contracts.
Engagement of small business professionals at early
stages of acquision will enable the Department to
ensure small business capabilies and technologies
are included in developing acquision strategies.
For example, early engagement by small business
professionals would assist in idenfying and, as
appropriate, addressing barriers to entry facing small
businesses earlier in the process. Some of these
barriers include improper consolidaon and bundling
of contracts, lack of sucient on-ramp opportunies
for category management vehicles, overly restricve
past performance requirements, inconsistent or
inappropriate usage of NAICS codes, and use of
interagency contract vehicles for which small businesses
do not qualify.
The Department furthers these objecves in current
policy by ensuring that senior execuves who oversee
acquisions will connue to have a mandatory
performance element in their performance objecves
related to support and fulllment of DoD’s small
business goals. Addionally, the Department’s current
policy mirrors the Small Business Act so that small
business directors across the Department have the
required reporng structure and seniority to impact
these issues.
18
The purpose is to help ensure that
small business directors have direct access to senior
leadership to advocate eecvely for small businesses
and ensure small business priories are included in
acquision planning.
Current DoD policy states that heads of the DoD
Components that award or administer contracts,
cooperave agreements, and grants shall appoint
Component Directors of Small Business Programs
in accordance with tle 15, United States Code to
include reporng to the Component head or second
in command and appointment to a posion that is a
Senior Execuve Service (SES) posion, unless the
Component Acquision Execuve is not an SES.
19
Current implementaon of these statutes and policies,
however, is uneven across DoD. For example, in a 2017
report
20
, the U.S. Government Accountability Oce
(GAO) idened that the Director of Small Business for
the Defense Logiscs Agency should be appointed to an
SES posion. To address such issues, DoD will ensure
the reporng structure and posion of small business
directors complies with statutory, regulatory, and
DoD policy requirements, so they can beer inuence
the inclusion of small business priories within their
respecve organizaons.
To ensure ongoing success of this Strategy, DoD
will regularly examine any resourcing shoralls
and, as needed, take appropriate acon to achieve
proper workforce resourcing. Inial rough esmates
of projected resource needs in connecon with
implementaon of this Strategy are provided in the
associated Implementaon Plan for this Strategy. In
the future, this eort will also include performing
appropriate assessments, projecons, and esmaons
regarding any other resource gaps connected with
execuon of this Strategy, to include establishing plans
for resourcing the SBP workforce through use of the
DoD Planning, Programming, Budgeng, and Execuon
process.
The Department also conducts periodic reviews of
defense acquision guides and direcves to ensure
they include current small business-related policies and
18 15 U.S.C. § 644(k)(3).
19 DoDI 4205.01 “DoD Small Business Programs” (August 2018).
20 GAO Report No. GAO-17-675” Small Business Contracng: Acons Needed to
Demonstrate and Beer Review Compliance with Select Requirements for Small Business
Advocates” (August 2017).
17
best pracces. The Department is currently analyzing
industry comments submied in response to the
Federal Register Noce (FRN) on Barriers Facing Small
Businesses in Contracng with the Department of
Defense (DoD-2021-OS-0077).
21
Through issuance of
this FRN, DoD sought input from industry on barriers to
entry and other topics, including governmental pracces
and regulaons that make it dicult or not worthwhile
to parcipate in the DIB; ways to increase its use of
small business innovaons; the availability of necessary
talent; and recommendaons to strengthen supply
chains, increase compeon in the DIB, and improve
small business parcipaon in procurements. The
results from the FRN will be assessed and integrated as
appropriate into future engagement strategies for small
business professionals.
In addion, the Department intends to support
eorts regarding appropriate use of “Rule of Two”
requirements, which could increase the use of small
business set-asides that will promote compeon and
result in fair market prices for defense procurements.
22
It is important for the Department to support use of
small business reserves, joint ventures or other teaming
arrangements, and available sole source authories to
aract emerging and individual small businesses when
condions for compeon are unknown or have not
been established.
The valley of death that oen plagues small businesses
can come in many forms. Some small businesses
outgrow the SBA size standards for their industry and
are forced to compete as “mid-er” companies with
much larger rms. The Department will work with
the SBA to advocate for small business size standards
that are driven by analysis of market intelligence and
market trends for each NAICS code. The Department
intends to support eorts that strike a balance between
ensuring large enough size standards that companies
do not outgrow too quickly, while also making sure
the size standards are not so large as to impede the
development of small businesses that seek to break into
industries in the defense marketplace.
A signicant poron of the small business industrial
base are subcontractors. Ensuring the health of
sub-er suppliers is crucial to a healthy, diverse,
and modernized industrial base. The Department
will explore ways to beer assess the health of the
subcontractor small business industrial base, as well
as use of innovave acquision techniques and other
ways to strengthen mechanisms to ensure prime
contractors are accountable for meeng their small
business subcontracng plans. Finally, the Department
21 Noce of Request for Comments on Barriers Facing Small Businesses in Contracng with
the Department of Defense, 86 F.R. 50333 (September 2021). 
22 13 C.F.R. § 125.2 ”What are SBA’s and the Procuring Agency’s Responsibilies When
Providing Contracng Assistance to Small Businesses” (June 2022); FAR § 19.502-2 Total Small
Business Set-asides (May 2022).
will connue accelerang payments to small business
concerns by the DoD and seek ways to incenvize large
prime contractors to do the same with small business
subcontractors, to include assessment of ways to
address slow cash ow through exisng accounng
pracces and business systems. Unreliable cash ow to
small businesses makes the DIB more fragile and less
secure.
Although this list is not exhausve, it serves as an
illustrave set of potenal areas for improvement.
These (and other related) policy and process iniaves
would serve to increase small business parcipaon in
small business friendly sectors, increase compeon
in defense procurements, and ensure that there
is a department-wide emphasis on small business
consideraon from the earliest stages of the acquision
process.
18
compliance with the Small Business Act; make the
Director of the DoD OSBP a member of the Industrial
Base Council (IBC) to facilitate integraon of small
business equies into broader DoD industrial base
acvies.
2.3.3. Develop and submit recommendaons to
the SBA concerning revisions of small business size
standards and related aliaon rules, as well as
acquision tools targeted to emerging small businesses.
2.3.4. Convene one or more working groups on
reducing barriers to entry for small businesses and
improving payment procedures for small businesses.
2.3.5. Provide guidance to the acquision workforce
on maers relang to small business contracng to
include consideraons for challenging a subcontracng
plan that does not contain meaningful goals for all
or any small business categories, evaluang past
performance on subcontracng to small businesses,
seeking appropriate contractual remedies when prime
contractors do not make a good faith eort to comply
with the subcontracng plan, and incenvizing and
enforcing requirements for prompt payment to small
businesses by prime contractors.
Implementaon acons to pursue for Strategic
Objecve 2:
2.1.1. Develop and issue guidance and plans for
orderly and deliberate implementaon of goals,
incenves, and reporng on small business parcipaon
in Research, Development, Test, and Evaluaon (RDT&E)
and transion to procurement / operaons. Explore
ways to increase use of Small Business Innovaon
Research/Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR/
STTR) Phase III awards in DoD acquision.
2.1.2. Develop policy, regulatory guidance, and
management controls to assist small business
professional parcipaon early in acquision strategy
development to support idencaon of opportunies
for small business programs and related eorts, such
as set-aside compeons, opportunies for SBIR/
STTR Phase III transion, and future procurement
opportunies for technologies from programs such as
the DoD MPP and RIF. Work to ensure DoD Component
Directors of small business programs are standing
members of governing DoD councils that implement
Category Management.
2.1.3. DoD OSBP will work with leadership of
the ManTech, MII, NSIC, IBAS, T2 and DPA Title III
programs to understand the amount of small business
parcipaon in these programs and to provide market
research and data analysis support to help idenfy
ways these programs can beer support small business
parcipaon.
2.1.4. Ensure full consideraon and applicaon of small
businesses set-aside requirements, parcularly below
the Simplied Acquision Threshold (SAT), to increase
opportunies for SDB, WOSB, SDVOSB, and HUBZone
SBs.
2.2.1. Develop and deploy market intelligence and
small business performance management tools for small
business professionals. The Department will work with
the SBA and the GSA on ways to recognize achievement
of goals for awards to small businesses under the GSA
Contractor Teaming Arrangements.
2.3.1. Assess the reporng structure of DoD small
business program oces across the Department to
ensure compliance with the Small Business Act and DoD
Instrucon (DoDI) 4205.01, including the requirement
that the DoD Component small business directors are
appointed to a posion in compliance with secon
1.b(3) of Enclosure 3 of DoDI 4205.01, and, as needed,
develop a roadmap to ensure these requirements are
met.
2.3.2. Ensure the Director of the DoD OSBP has
appropriate access to Departmental leadership and
the reporng structure of this posion remains in
18
programs to understand the amount of small business
parcipaon in these programs and to provide market
research and data analysis support to help idenfy
ways these programs can beer support small business
parcipaon.
2.1.4.
E
nsure full consideraon and applicaon of small
businesses set-aside requirements, parcularly below
the Simplied Acquision Threshold (SAT), to increase
opportunies for SDB, WOSB, SDVOSB, and HUBZone
SBs.
2.2.1.
D
evelop and deploy market intelligence and
small business performance management tools for small
business professionals. The Department will work with
the SBA and the GSA on ways to recognize achievement
of goals for awards to small businesses under the GSA
Contractor Teaming Arrangements.
2.3.1.
Assess the r
eporng structure of DoD small
business program oces across the Department to
ensure compliance with the Small Business Act and DoD
Instrucon (DoDI) 4205.01, including the requirement
that the DoD Component small business directors are
appointed to a posion in compliance with secon
1.b(3) of Enclosure 3 of DoDI 4205.01, and, as needed,
develop a roadmap to ensure these requirements are
met.
2.3.2.
E
nsure the Director of the DoD OSBP has
appropriate access to Departmental leadership and
the reporng structure of this posion remains in
19
Strategic Objective 3:
Strengthen the Departments
Engagement and Support of
Small Businesses
Execuve Order 14058, “Federal Customer Experience
and Service Delivery to Rebuild Trust in Government,
23
reemphasizes the need for agencies to design and
deliver services and processes with a focus on
eecveness, eciency, responsiveness, transparency,
and equity to reduce the so-called “me tax” of
individuals, including small business owners, who must
wait on the government to respond.. In alignment with
these priories, this strategic objecve is designed
to improve the Department’s communicaon and
interacon with small businesses, focusing on a few
key areas of crical interest: (1) improving outreach
and communicaon on small business opportunies;
(2) providing cybersecurity training and other resources
to small businesses; and (3) educang small businesses
on risks of, and alternaves to, accepng foreign
adversarial capital.
3.1. Improve Outreach and Communications
with Small Businesses
The Department must strengthen its relaonships
and communicaon methods with small businesses
and clearly describe small business programs and
contracng opportunies in ways that are easy to
understand and navigate. APEX plays an essenal role
in the Department’s eorts to idenfy and engage with
small companies entering or parcipang in the defense
supply-chain, and provides educaon and training small
businesses need to parcipate in defense procurements.
The Department enters into cooperave agreements
with APEX Accelerators that serve as a resource for
businesses to obtain informaon and training related to
contracng and subcontracng opportunies with the
Department, other Federal agencies, and state and local
governments. There are 96 APEX Accelerators assisng
businesses in 49 states, Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico,
Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of
Northern Marianas, and in regions established by the
Bureau of Indian Aairs in the U.S. Department of the
Interior.
As a primary interface with small businesses in the eld,
APEX Accelerators work directly with private sector,
university, non-prot, and local enes to conduct the
type of outreach acvies necessary to develop long-
term relaonships with the small business community
and the larger defense industry. APEX Accelerators
23 E.O. 14058 “Transforming Federal Customer Experience and Service Delivery to Rebuild
Trust in Government” (December 2021).
have long served as a vital resource to small businesses
for many programs, including SBIR/STTR, and they
connue to receive signicant interest from the small
business community. To further this success, the
Department will clarify the roles for APEX Accelerators,
responsibilies, and resources, and will provide APEX
Accelerators with tools that will beer posion them
to understand the Department’s requirements and
provide feedback on their procurement technical
assistance acvies, which will support DoD’s market
research, and provide insight to Department leadership
on supply chain issues. Currently, APEX Accelerators
primarily respond to industry requests, and are an
underulized outreach resource for the Department’s
small business professionals. The Department intends
to beer leverage APEX Accelerators by establishing
a process through which small business oces and
programs across the Department as well as local small
business professionals, can directly collaborate with
APEX Accelerators to carry out tailored outreach
events, educaon and training opportunies, or specic
assistance to small business. Some of the programs and
iniaves that regularly work with small businesses
include Air Force’s Air Force Works (AFWERX), Navy’s
Naval Expedions (NavalX), Army Futures Command
(AFC), and the United States Special Operaons
Command (USSOCOM)’s Special Operaons Forces
Works (SOFWERX).
20
parcipate in their organizaon’s procurements.
This level of engagement will help small businesses
understand where the Department is headed with
its future requirements, so they can beer align their
business models and investments.
The Department will also pursue improving its
acquision forecasts for industry. Providing accurate
and relevant forecasng is an eecve way to
communicate to industry about future requirements and
direcon. Accomplishing this goal, however, remains a
challenge, parcularly in connecon with exisng small
business programs and related eorts. The Department
intends to pursue development of forecasng tools
for small business oces and other organizaons to
enable producon and distribuon of mely and useful
forecasts.
3.2. Provide Cybersecurity Training and
Resources to Small Businesses
Cybersecurity threats to the DIB keep expanding in
number, frequency, and severity. Protecng DoD
informaon and capabilies from these increasingly
sophiscated threats posed by foreign competors
and adversaries remains a crical naonal security
priority for the Department. The resources required
to safeguard data and systems from common and
advanced persistent threats can put a strain on
companies of any size, but resource-constrained small
businesses are parcularly vulnerable. Small businesses
make up over 70 percent of the industrial base, making
cyber risks to the supply chain a signicant concern.
Supporng cyber resilience within the small business
Contracng with the federal government can be a
complicated and daunng task for small businesses,
especially for new entrants to the DIB. Providing small
businesses and DoD small business professionals
with educaonal resources explaining complex
topics related to government contracng can be an
eecve way to migate this barrier. For example,
one topic that can hinder or deter small businesses in
government contracng is Intellectual Property (IP)
protecon. Protecng a prime or subcontractor’s IP is an
imperave for both the Department and the company.
When contracng with the federal government,
small businesses oen do not have the knowledge
or resources possessed by large businesses when
negoang IP-related contract terms. Ensuring small
businesses and small business professionals have access
to the educaon, training, and resources needed for
complex topics like IP protecon helps small businesses
thrive in the defense marketplace, for the benet of the
enre DIB and DoD.
Another essenal component is connued engagement
from senior leadership across the Department in
promong the objecves of this Strategy through
annual small business memoranda and events, including
engagement from the Secretaries of the Military
Departments, Directors of the Defense Agencies, Senior
Acquision Execuves, Program Execuve Ocers, and
Program Managers. These DoD leaders should connue
to parcipate regularly in small business industry
and matchmaking events, issue workforce guidance
regarding priorizaon of small business contracng,
and ensure their organizaons clearly and eecvely
communicate opportunies for small business to
21
industrial base is key to enabling these companies to
address industrial base gaps across the Department.
Cybercriminals know that small businesses are the most
resource constrained, high value targets in the defense
supply chain so they repeatedly target companies that
are oen unprepared to prevent those aacks.
To combat this constant risk to the U.S. defense supply
chain, the Department is commied to ensuring
good cybersecurity hygiene throughout the DIB. By
promong and assisng with cyber resilience for small
businesses, DoD can play a key role in enabling these
companies to address cybersecurity gaps, while also
migang threats to the supply chain and DoD sensive
informaon.
Recognizing these challenges, the Department
iniated Project Spectrum. According to its website
(hps://projectspectrum.io), Project Spectrum is a
comprehensive “plaorm that provides companies,
instuons, and organizaons with cybersecurity
informaon, resources, tools, and training. Its mission
is to improve cybersecurity readiness, resiliency,
and compliance for small/medium-sized businesses
and the federal manufacturing supply chain.The
Department intends to provide guidance to small
businesses in connecon with the conduct of voluntary
self-assessments of cyber preparedness, as well
as, as appropriate, tools, technologies, and training
small businesses can use to help improve their cyber
resilience.
3.3. Educate Small Businesses on Risks of
Foreign Ownership, Control, and Inuence
The United States’ adversaries increasingly use non-
military means to achieve their objecves during the
compeon” phase of conict by operang eecvely
in what is known as the “Gray Zone.” These gray zone
acons include the targeng of our smallest and most
innovave companies through controlled access to
rare raw materials, supply chains, and through foreign
ownership, control, or inuence (FOCI) operaons
that work in conjuncon with state sponsored or
proxy intelligence and cyber forces. These operaons
target key technology sectors, providing adversaries
and near-peer competors access to American IP and
ingenuity. This access can be legally gained through joint
ventures, mergers, and acquisions, or illegally through
cyber espionage. These acvies can undermine U.S.
eorts to pursue global economic and naonal security
interests.
Helping protect the DoD small business industrial base
from these threats is crical to economic and naonal
security and requires taking a comprehensive approach.
DoD can make an immediate impact by educang and
training small businesses on these threats. Many small
companies are not aware of potenal vulnerabilies.
Training and educaon can help small businesses gain
a baseline understanding of these types of threats
and steps they can take to address them. Educaonal
plaorms for small business should be expanded to
help small businesses gain a baseline understanding of
FOCI threats to address them. Addionally, although
the Department has worked to connect innovave
companies working with the Department to sources of
domesc capital, this work has proven challenging due
to the lack of DoD-wide due diligence standards and
the diculty of incenvizing private domesc capital to
work with the Department in such a program.
Establishing a small business FOCI working group
would help the Department explore addional steps
in this area and ensure that DoD can strike the right
balance between taking addional measures and
minimizing regulatory burdens that may deter the
naon’s most innovave companies from wanng to
do business with the Department. Some concepts
that may potenally be addressed include developing
due diligence capabilies to capture data and provide
a mul-dimensional risk prole of DIB small business
parcipants, assessing FOCI risk associated with
defense contractors, and establishing market-based
incenves to drive behaviors that are conducive to both
economic and naonal security. Potenal stakeholders
include OSBP and other oces within OUSD(A&S) such
as DPC, OUSD (R&E), the Defense Security Enterprise
Advisory Group (DSEAG), the Defense Technology
Security Administraon (DTSA), and the Defense
Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA).
Addionally, the Department will explore ways to
incenvize domesc investment from trusted domesc
sources of capital into veed technology companies,
which would diminish reliance on overseas capital to
small companies in the technology and naonal security
industrial base.
22
22
Implementaon acons to pursue for Strategic Objecve 3:
3.1.1. Develop and issue guidance on managing, resourcing, and using APEX Accelerators. This guidance will help
beer posion APEX Accelerators to understand the Department’s requirements and provide feedback on their
procurement technical assistance acvies, which will support DoD’s market research, and provide insight to
Department leadership on supply chain issues. This guidance would also enable DoD Component Small Business
Directors, as well as small business professionals in the eld, to leverage APEX Accelerators for targeted outreach
and assistance acvies tailored to specic acquisions and mission needs.
3.1.2. Develop IP training resources that will benet
the small business community in coordinaon and
collaboraon with the DoD IP Cadre and DAU.
3.1.3. Include informaon about current IP educaon
programs in DoD outreach and communicaons eorts
to small businesses seeking to do business with the
Department.
3.1.4. Enhance small business communicaon and
parcipaon by the Department’s senior leaders,
including the issuances of annual memoranda and
increased parcipaon in small business events.
3.1.5. Streamline the roles and responsibilies of DoD
small business oces with regards to procurement
forecasng, and support enhancement of DoD
forecasng processes to enable producon and
distribuon of mely, accurate, and relevant forecasts.
3.2.1. Develop and provide guidance to support small
businesses in connecon with the conduct of voluntary
self-assessments of cyber preparedness, as well as
the tools, technologies, mentoring, and training small
businesses need to improve their cyber resilience.
3.3.1. Develop industry training that can be
disseminated through available outreach tools and
sources of assistance such as APEX Accelerators that
helps small businesses gain a baseline understanding of
FOCI and address them.
3.3.2. Convene a working group to explore ways
to assist small businesses with migang FOCI
risks including ensuring small business interests are
considered in the development of common standards
for conducng due diligence and possible methods
of leveraging domesc capital in support of small
businesses in crical technology sectors.
23
Conclusion
The Department is commied to rebuilding a robust and agile small business industrial base, and this strategy
represents an important step in that process. Small businesses provide for nearly the enre spectrum of the
Department’s needs and the breadth and depth of eorts outlined in this strategy reect that importance.
Recognizing that the Department’s own pracces have played a role in turning businesses away, DoD has carefully
examined what specic reforms must be advanced to remove or reduce those barriers. This strategy provides a
roadmap to reverse the recent decline of small businesses in the DIB and leverage small businesses to deliver the
best technologies, services, and products to the warghter. Recruing more small businesses into the DIB means a
more advanced military, stronger supply chains, and a more equitable and prosperous naonal economy.
The Department is working to lay a foundaon for the kind of Industrial Base needed to win in the 21st century,
by streamlining the small business management structure, ensuring acvies beer support naonal security,
and increasing engagement with industry. Together, these iniaves can bring long-term supply chain resiliency,
increased compeon, and improved equity to the DIB and the country. Most importantly, they will help the United
States maintain technological advantage over strategic competors.
As the internaonal landscape grows more complicated and more dangerous by the day, it is more important than
ever that the United States hosts a DIB worthy of the world’s nest military. While the country faces immense
challenges, there is no group beer suited to meet them than American entrepreneurs and small business owners.
This small business strategy will unlock the full potenal of small businesses and strengthen our naonal security.
24
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ASD Assistant Secretary of Defense
CRADA Cooperave Research and Development Agreement
CRM Customer Relaonship Management
DAU Defense Acquision University
DFARS Defense Federal Acquision Regulaon Supplement
DIB Defense Industrial Base
DIU Defense Innovaon Unit
DLA Defense Logiscs Agency
DoD Department of Defense
DoDI Department of Defense Instrucon
DPA Defense Producon Act
DPC Defense Pricing and Contracng
DSCA Defense Support of Civil Authories
FAR Federal Acquision Regulaon
FOCI Foreign Ownership, Control, and Inuence
FTE Full-Time Equivalent
GSA General Services Administraon
HUBZone SB Historically Underulized Business Zone Small Business
IBAS Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment
IBC Industrial Base Council
IP Intellectual Property
ManTech Manufacturing Technology Program
MII Manufacturing Innovaon Instutes
MPP Mentor-Protégé Program
MRCOE Market Research Center of Excellence
NDAA Naonal Defense Authorizaon Act
NSIC Naonal Security Innovaon Capital
OSBP Oce of Small Business Programs
OUSD(A&S) Oce of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquision and Sustainment
OUSD(R&E) Oce of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering
PTAC Procurement Technical Assistance Center
25
PTAP Procurement Technical Assistance Program
SAT Simplied Acquision Threshold
SBA Small Business Administraon
SBDC Small Business Development Center
SBIR Small Business Innovaon Research
SDB Small Disadvantaged Business
SDVOSB Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business
STTR Small Business Technology Transfer
RIF Rapid Innovaon Fund
USPTO United States Patent and Trademark Oce
WOSB Women-Owned Small Business