Issue Brief: The costs and risks of using a reverse mortgage to delay

August 2017

Issue Brief: The costs

and risks of using a

reverse mortgage to

delay collecting Social

Security

Office for Older Americans

1 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Table of contents

1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 2

2. Social Security and home equity provide retirement security for

millions of older Americans ................................................................................. 5

Social Security ................................................................................................... 5

Home equity ...................................................................................................... 8

3. Using a reverse mortgage loan to delay claiming Social Security

carries financial risks ......................................................................................... 10

Costs of using a reverse mortgage .................................................................... 11

Diminished home equity could limit options for some borrowers ................. 14

4. Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 18

Additional resources for consumers ............................................................... 19

Appendix A: Methodology and Assumptions ..................................................... 20

Appendix B: Reverse mortgage loan balances, home value, home

equity, and Social Security ................................................................................ 25

2 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

1. Introduction

For millions of Americans, Social Security and accrued home equity are likely to be their

primary source of wealth in later life as a growing number of them are expected to reach

retirement with limited savings and/or income from traditional pensions.

Recognizing that a majority of older Americans rely upon Social Security benefits as their

primary or only regular source of inflation-protected income in their later years, many financial

professionals recommend that consumers increase their monthly benefits by claiming Social

Security at their full benefit age or later instead of collecting early.

By claiming at their full

benefit age or later age as opposed to collecting early, beneficiaries receive a permanent increase

in monthly payments, and possibly a higher cumulative amount over their lifetime.

See e.g., Jack VanDerhei, What Causes EBRI Retirement Readiness Ratings to Vary: Results from the 2014

Retirement Security Projection Model, EBRI Issue Brief, No. 396 (Feb. 2014), available at

http://www.ebri.org/pdf/briefspdf/EBRI_IB_396_Feb14.RRRs2.pdf

; see also, Alicia Munnell, et al., NRRI update

shows half still falling short, CRR Issue Brief 14 (Dec. 2014), available at http://crr.bc.edu/wp-

content/uploads/2014/12/IB_14-20-508.pdf.

See e.g., AARP and the Financial Planning Association, Social Security Planning in 2015 and Beyond: Perspectives

of Future beneficiaries Beneficiaries and Financial Planners, (2015), at 25, available at

http://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/research/surveys_statistics/econ/2015/fpa-soc-sec-and-beyond-res-

econ.pdf.

3 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

With that in mind, one strategy that varied financial professionals promote is for older

homeowners to borrow a reverse mortgage at age 62 in order to delay claiming Social Security.

A reverse mortgage loan is a unique type of mortgage for homeowners age 62 and older.

Borrowers do not need to repay the loan until the last borrower dies or moves from the home as

long as they live in the home, maintain the home in good repair, and pay their real estate taxes

and homeowner’s insurance.

According to this strategy, a retiree would use the reverse mortgage loan proceeds to fund a

delay in Social Security benefit claiming. That is, an older homeowner could use reverse

The following examples are not meant to be an exhaustive or representative list of all professionals or mediums used

to promote this strategy. See, e.g. Michael Lazar, Yes, You Can Delay Social Security with a Reverse Mortgage,

Huffington Post (April 2016),

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-lazar/yes-you-can-delay-

social_b_9773640.html (last visited Aug. 21, 2017); Jason Oliva, New Social Security Rules Play Into Reverse

Mortgage Retirement Strengths, Reverse Mortgage Daily (Sept. 2016),

http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2016/09/12/new-social-security-rules-play-into-reverse-mortgage-retirement-

strengths/ (last visited Aug. 21, 2017); The Mortgage Professor, Using a HECM Reverse Mortgage to Delay Taking

Social Security (Apr. 16, 2015), https://www.mtgprofessor.com/A%20-

%20Reverse%20Mortgages/Using_Calculator_To_Delay_Social_Security.html (last visited Aug. 21, 2017); Sean

Bryant, Should You Delay Your Social Security Benefits?, One Reverse Mortgage (Jan. 19, 2017),

https://www.onereversemortgage.com/blog/2017/01/should-you-delay-your-social-security-benefits/ (last visited

Aug. 8, 2017); Alain Valles, Social Security and reverse mortgages (Aug. 31, 2016),

http://www.fiftyplusadvocate.com/archives/11091 (last visited Aug. 21, 2017); Genworth Financial Home Equity

Access, Defer Social Security with a Reverse Mortgage (Dec. 6, 2010),

http://www.creditunions.com/articles/defer-social-security-with-a-reverse-mortgage/ (last visited Aug. 21, 2017);

Tom Davison, Reverse Mortgage Funds Social Security Delay (March 31, 2014),

https://toolsforretirementplanning.com/2014/03/31/ss-delay/ (last visited Aug. 21, 2017) (providing a scenario of

a homeowner who uses a reverse mortgage to delay Social Security from age 62 to age 70. The scenario assumes the

borrower has other sources of income and assets, and withdraws savings from a retirement account as part of the

strategy to delay Social Security).

See Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), FHA Reverse Mortgages (HECMs) for Seniors,

https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/housing/sfh/hecm/hecmabou

(last visited Aug. 21,

2017). (Referred to as HUD Reverse Mortgages for Seniors). Nearly all reverse mortgage loans originated today are

insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) under the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage program

(HECM). In 2016, nearly 50,000 reverse mortgage loans were endorsed. See National Reverse Mortgage Lenders

Association (NRMLA), Annual HECM Endorsement Chart,

https://www.nrmlaonline.org/2017/05/02/annual-

hecm-endorsement-chart (last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

4 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

mortgage proceeds as income to replace the money the homeowner would otherwise receive in

Social Security benefits in the years between the minimum benefits age (age 62), up to their full

benefits age (between ages 66 and 67, depending on the person’s date of birth) or their

maximum benefits age (70).

As nearly five million homeowners will turn age 62 by 2020,

the Consumer Financial

Protection Bureau (CFPB) is concerned that the broad promotion of this strategy could result in

an increased number of homeowners borrowing a reverse mortgage for this purpose.

This issue brief explores the tradeoffs of borrowing a reverse mortgage loan in order to delay

claiming Social Security.

The CFPB examined different scenarios and found that, in general,

the reverse mortgage loan costs exceed the cumulative increase in Social Security that

homeowners would receive in their lifetime by delaying Social Security benefits.

Furthermore,

using this strategy will likely diminish the amount of home equity available to borrowers later in

life. As a result of the diminished equity, borrowers that seek to sell their homes after using this

strategy may have limited options for moving to a new location or handling a financial shock.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) analysis of the U.S. Census American Community Survey, 2015 using

Dataferret, https://dataferrett.census.gov/

(last visited Aug. 21, 2017). This estimate is based on the number of

households headed by homeowners between ages 55 and 61 in 2015.

For more information about the importance of the Social Security retirement benefits claiming decision, see CFPB,

Issue Brief: Social Security claiming age and retirement security (Nov. 2015), available at

http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201511_cfpb_issue-brief-social-security-claiming-age-and-retirement-

security.pdf.

More details about the assumptions used in these examples can be found in Appendix A.

5 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

2. Social Security and home

equity provide retirement

security for millions of older

Americans

Social Security

About 85 percent of consumers age 65 and older receive income from Social Security.

In 2015, the average Social Security retirement

average, Social Security benefits account for 63 percent of the income of Social Security

beneficiaries aged 65 and older.

For beneficiaries aged 80 and older, Social Security benefits

account for 71 percent of their income. (Figure 1)

See SSA, Income of the Population 55 or Older, 2014 Table 2.A1 Percentage with income from specified source, by

marital status and age, 2014 (Apr. 2014),

https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/income_pop55/2014/sect09.html

(last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

See SSA, Income of the Population 55 or Older, 2014, Table 9.A1 Relative Importance of Social Security for

Beneficiary Aged Units (Apr. 2014), https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/income_pop55/2014/sect09.html

(last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

6 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

monthly benefit was $1,296.

As coverage and benefits paid under traditional defined benefit

pensions continue to decline, Social Security is likely to become the only source of regular

lifetime income for the majority of the older population.

FIGURE 1: AVERAGE SHARE OF INCOME FROM SOCIAL SECURITY AND OTHER SOURCES BY AGE

GROUP (2014)

Source: Social Security Administration, 2014

See SSA, Monthly Statistical Snapshot, Table 2. Social Security benefits, December 2015 (Jan. 2016),

https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/quickfacts/stat_snapshot/2015-12.html

(last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

See e.g., Barbara Butrica, et al., The Disappearing Defined Benefit Pension and Its Potential Impact on the

Retirement Incomes of Baby Boomers, Social Security Bulletin, 69 (2009), at 20, available at

https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v69n3/v69n3p1.pdf

; See also, Melissa Favreault, et al., Boomers’ Retirement

Income Prospects (2012), available at http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/412490-

Boomers-Retirement-Income-Prospects.PDF.

55%

62%

67%

71%

45%

39%

33%

29%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

65–69 70–74 75–79

80 or older

Social Security Other sources of income

7 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

One way in which people can increase their monthly benefit is by claiming at the age when they

are expected to receive their full benefits, which is between ages 66 and 67 depending upon the

person’s date of birth. Approximately 40 percent of eligible individuals claim their benefits at

62, the earliest eligibility age, thereby receiving a permanently reduced monthly Social Security

benefit.

For people born after 1960, who are eligible to get a full benefit at age 67, Social Security

monthly benefits are reduced by as much as 30 percent when they claim at age 62.

Social

Security provides inflation-adjusted payments for the rest of a beneficiary’s life. And consumers

who live to or beyond the average life expectancy of a 62 year old today (approximately age 85)

will receive more money cumulatively from receiving an increased monthly benefit than

consumers who claim earlier and therefore receive lower monthly payments for a longer

period.

For example, a woman age 62 today who lives to age 85

will receive $29,640 more in

cumulative benefits during her lifetime if she claims a monthly benefit of $1,300 at age 67 than

if she claims a monthly benefit of $910 at age 62.

See CFPB analysis of SSA’s Annual Statistical Supplement, supra. An alternative analysis that focused on claiming

patterns by individuals born in the same year found that nearly 40 percent of consumers that reached age 62 in

2013 claimed their benefits at their earliest eligibility age. See Alicia Munnell & Anqi Chen, Trends in Social

Security Claiming, CRR Issue Brief 15 (May 2015), at 3, available at

http://crr.bc.edu/wp-

content/uploads/2015/05/IB_15-8.pdf.

See SSA, Benefit Reduction for Early Retirement, https://www.ssa.gov/oact/quickcalc/earlyretire.html (last visited

Aug. 21, 2017).

See John Shoven & Sita Nataraj Slavov, Does It Pay to Delay Social Security?, Journal of Pension Economics and

Finance (2013), available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w18210.pdf

; Wei Sun & Anthony Webb, How Much Do

Households Really Lose by Claiming Social Security at Age 62?, CRR Working Paper No. 2009–11 (2009),

available at

http://crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/WP_2009_11-508.pdf.

See SSA, Actuarial Life Table, https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html (last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

Calculations of lifetime benefits are done in today’s dollars without adjustments for present net value of benefits or

costs of living adjustments.

8 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Home equity

In addition to Social Security benefits, home equity is an important financial resource for older

consumers. In 2015, 80 percent of consumers 65 and older owned their homes– 30 percent of

them with a mortgage and 70 percent without.

Nearly 90 percent of older homeowners have

net equity in their home.

Compared to other financial resources, home equity is the most

valuable asset for the largest number of older consumers. In 2013, home equity accounted for

nearly 20 percent of all the assets held by consumers age 65 and older.

FIGURE 2: SHARE OF ASSETS OF HOUSEHOLDS 65 AND OLDER BY SOURCE (2013)

Source: Survey of Consumer Finances, 2013

See, Census Bureau, American Housing Survey 2015, Table: 2015 National - Mortgage Characteristics - Owner-

occupied Units by Age of Householder, at

https://www.census.gov/programs-

surveys/ahs/data/interactive/ahstablecreator.html (last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

CFPB analysis of the Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances 2013, at

https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm

(last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

Id.

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

CDs

Auto

401(k) and employer-based plans

Stocks

IRAs/Keoghs

Home Equity

9 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

For the majority of older homeowners, homeownership provides affordable housing in

retirement.

On average, older homeowners spend a smaller proportion of their income on

housing costs than renters.

In addition, many older homeowners have a potential source of

savings in the equity accrued in their homes that can help some meet their financial needs in

retirement. For example, homeowners can access their home equity by selling their home or by

borrowing against their equity. Homeowners with an existing mortgage can do so through a

cash-out refinancing either via a forward or reverse mortgage, or by taking out a second

mortgage or home equity line of credit. Homeowners who no longer have a mortgage have the

option of a new forward mortgage, a home equity loan, or a reverse mortgage.

See, Census Bureau, American Housing Survey 2015, Table: 2015 National – Housing Costs – All Occupied Units

by Age of Householder and Tenure, at

https://www.census.gov/programs-

surveys/ahs/data/interactive/ahstablecreator.html (last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

Id.

10 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

3. Using a reverse mortgage

loan to delay claiming Social

Security carries financial

risks

A homeowner that borrows a reverse mortgage loan to delay collecting Social Security benefits

receives loan proceeds secured by the equity in their home during the period of the delay. In

doing so, they assume debt for the principal loan amount, as well as for interest, mortgage

insurance premiums (MIP), and monthly servicing fees,

which are added to the principal every

month.

In addition, origination and closing costs are often added to the loan balance since

most consumers choose to finance these costs using the reverse mortgage proceeds.

Over time,

the balance of the loan increases as a result of compounding interest and MIP, and fees. The

See HUD Reverse Mortgages for Seniors, supra, note 4.

See CFPB, Reverse Mortgage Report to Congress (June 2012), at 99, available at

http://files.consumerfinance.gov/a/assets/documents/201206_cfpb_Reverse_Mortgage_Report.pdf

11 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

increasing loan balance will slowly reduce the available home equity to homeowners who wish to

sell and move.

Costs of using a reverse mortgage

Below we report the results from a series of scenarios that quantify the costs of a reverse

mortgage for a hypothetical retired homeowner and compare these costs to the expected

additional benefits received from delaying Social Security claiming from age 62 to 67.

We find that, in general, the reverse mortgage loan costs (i.e. origination costs, interest,

mortgage insurance premium and fees) will exceed the additional amount of money in lifetime

Social Security benefits a homeowner will realize by using this strategy. For example, a

homeowner with an expected monthly benefit of $910 at age 62 who delays claiming Social

Security benefits until age 67 will get a higher benefit of $1,300 per month. Given that the

average life expectancy of a 62 year old today is about age 85, this homeowner is likely to receive

a cumulative lifetime benefit that is $29,640 more by age 85 if she claims at 67 than an average

62-year-old would receive if she claimed at 62.

As shown in Figure 3, the reverse mortgage loan costs generally exceed the cumulative amount

gained by collecting full Social Security benefits (i.e., claiming benefits at the full retirement

age). This is specifically the case if the loan is repaid by the average length of a reverse mortgage

A paper examining housing transitions found that one third of American homeowners move from their home at age

50 and older, and nearly 70 percent of these movers purchase another home. James Banks, et al., Housing Price

Volatility and Downsizing in Later Life, National Bureau of Economic Research, Research Findings in the

Economics of Aging (2010), at http://www.nber.org/chapters/c8210

(last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

12 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

(approximately 7 years, or age 69 for a loan borrowed at age 62),

or by the average life

expectancy (age 85).

Average length of a reverse mortgage: Based on a study of reverse mortgage loans issued

before 2006, the average borrower holds a reverse mortgage for seven years.

In seven years,

when the borrower turns 69 and terminates the loan, the reverse mortgage loan costs will be

$31,900, approximately $2,300 more than the lifetime amount of money gained from an

increased Social Security benefit if the consumer lives to age 85 ($29,640).

Average life expectancy: By age 85, approximately the average life expectancy of a 62 year

old, the reverse mortgage loan costs will be $178,000, approximately $149,000 more than the

lifetime amount of money gained from an increased Social Security benefit if the consumer lives

to age 85 ($29,640).

See Edward Szymanoski, et al., Home Equity Conversion Mortgage Terminations: Information to Enhance the

Developing Secondary Market, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 9, no. 1 (2007), at 21-22,

available at https://www.huduser.gov/periodicals/cityscpe/vol9num1/ch1.pdf

(showing that reverse mortgage

loans are terminated on average within six to seven years for younger borrowers, ages 64-66). (Referred to as

Szymanoski HECM Terminations). For recent trends in reverse mortgage borrowers’ pay off behaviors, see CFPB,

Reverse Mortgage Report to Congress, at 63 (June 2012), available at

http://files.consumerfinance.gov/a/assets/documents/201206_cfpb_Reverse_Mortgage_Report.pdf.

See footnote 26 above.

13 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

FIGURE 3: BREAKDOWN OF LOAN BALANCE AT SELECTED AGES OF A REVERSE MORTGAGE

ORIGINATED AT AGE 62

Age Principal

(a)

Origination

Costs

(b)

MIP

(1.25%)

(c)

Interest

(4.65%)

(d)

Servicing

Fees

Total

Costs

(a, b, c, d)

Total

debt

age 67 $54,600 $7,700 $2,500 $9,300 $2,100 $21,600 $76,200

age 69 $54,600 $7,700 $4,500 $16,800 $2,900 $31,900 $86,600

age 85 $54,600 $7,700 $34,100 $127,000 $9,700 $178,500

$233,200

Source: CFPB Calculations

Amounts are rounded to the nearest hundredth. Due to rounding, amounts presented may not add up precisely to

the totals provided.

The principal loan amount is approximately the amount of money in Social Security benefits that the borrower

would have collected between ages 62 and 67. In order to approximately substitute the Social Security benefit that

the consumer would otherwise receive, we assume that the borrower is borrowing $54,600 using the reverse

mortgage’s line of credit feature and receiving equal monthly installments of $910 over the course of the five year

period.

For a detailed list of closing costs, see NRMLA, Application, Fees, and Disclosures,

http://www.reversemortgage.org/Your-Roadmap/4-Application-Fees-Disclosures

(last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

Appendix A provides the specific amounts used for calculating the origination costs.

Id. Percentage shown is the annual MIP rate.

This is the annual average interest rate for an adjustable rate reverse mortgage in December 2016. See Appendix A

for information about the assumptions about interest rates.

A servicing fee of $35 is typically added monthly to a borrower’s loan balance. See NRMLA, Application, Fees, and

Disclosures, supra note 29. See Appendix A for a detailed table of assumptions about reverse mortgage costs.

Origination and closing costs are included in the loan balance.

14 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Figure 3 shows that reverse mortgage costs exceed the amount gained from delaying claiming

Social Security unless the loan is repaid at age 67. For example, a borrower who terminates the

loan at his full retirement age of 67 will pay approximately $21,600 in loan costs (i.e. origination

costs, interest, mortgage insurance premium and fees), which is lower than the additional

lifetime amount gained by collecting full Social Security ($29,640). However, many older

homeowners, especially those for whom their home is their main asset, are unlikely to have the

resources to repay the loan immediately upon claiming full benefits unless they sell the home at

that time.

In addition, Figure 3 shows that borrowing a reverse mortgage loan is an expensive way to delay

collecting Social Security benefits. For instance, at age 67, the loan costs are $21,600 or

approximately 40 percent of the principal borrowed. At age 69, only two years later, the loan

costs are $31,900 or approximately 60 percent of the principal borrowed.

Diminished home equity could limit options

for some borrowers

The effects of using a reverse mortgage loan to delay collecting Social Security benefits is also

reflected in the reduced equity that homeowners are likely to have in their homes as a result of

taking out a reverse mortgage at age 62. This is problematic if, for example, it becomes

necessary and desirable for homeowners to sell their homes after taking out the reverse

See Stephanie Moulton, et al., Aging in Place: Analyzing the Use of Reverse Mortgages to Preserve Independent

Living Summary Report of Survey Results (Mar. 2016), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2749368

(Referred to as Moulton, Aging in Place Study) (showing that half of homeowners who obtained and retained a

reverse mortgage had less than $21,500 in non-housing assets).

15 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

mortgage.

For these consumers,

having borrowed from a reverse mortgage to delay collecting

Social Security benefits could eventually limit their options for moving to a new location

handling a financial shock. The options for reverse mortgage borrowers may become even more

limited over time because their loan balance is likely to grow at a faster rate than their home will

appreciate.

Consider the following example for a typical 62-year-old homeowner with a home worth

$175,000. Assume the home appreciates in value at a rate of 4 percent per year and that the

homeowner borrows a reverse mortgage with an interest rate of 5.9 percent. At age 67, this

homeowner will have a home valued approximately at $212,914, and at age 85, the home will be

valued at $431,325.

At age 67, the homeowner who borrowed $54,600 from a reverse

mortgage to delay collecting Social Security will have only 64 percent of the total value of his

home available if he decides to sell the home and move. (Figure 4) By age 85, this homeowner

will have only 46 percent of his home value available as equity.

A 2007 study shows that over 70 percent of reverse mortgages are terminated by non-mortality related events, such

as refinancing, foreclosure, and moving. See UBS, Mortgage Strategist, Repayment Profile of Reverse Mortgages.

(Sept. 2007) at 33, available at

https://www.nrmlaonline.org/app_assets/public/d24a71d1-88ea-4508-acb6-

c1242333e9d7/Repayment%20Profile_UBS%2010-04-07.pdf.

Reverse mortgage borrowers typically move to downsize, live closer to family or friends, or reduce the costs

associated with homeownership. See Moulton Aging in Place Study, supra, note 34.

Historical LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) rates, on which adjustable reverse mortgages are based, have

varied significantly over time. See Macrotrends, 1 Month LIBOR Rate - 30 Year Historical Chart,

http://www.macrotrends.net/2518/1-month-libor-rate-historical-chart

(last visited Aug. 21, 2017). While current

LIBOR rates are at historic low levels, when combined with the average lender’s margin and private mortgage

insurance (PMI), the combined interest rate is likely to be higher than the average home appreciation rate during

the same period.

For information about home value assumptions, see Appendix A.

16 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

FIGURE 4: PERCENT OF HOME VALUE AVAILABLE TO HOMEOWNERS WHO BORROW A REVERSE

MORTGAGE TO DELAY SOCIAL SECURITY

Source: CFPB Calculations

The reduction on home equity is even greater for homeowners when homes appreciate at a lower

rate than the reverse mortgage interest rate. For example, a 62-year-old homeowner who has a

home worth $175,000, with an appreciation rate of only 2 percent per year, will have only 61

percent of the total value of the home available as equity at age 67. By age 85, this homeowner

will have only about 16 percent of the home value available in equity when selling the house and

moving.

For methodology and assumptions, see Appendix A.

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85

5.9% (Interest Rate + MIP) appreciation rate

4% appreciation rate

2% appreciation rate

17 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

For homeowners who occupy their home as a primary residence until death, using a reverse

mortgage to delay collecting Social security provides the use of an additional $54,600 worth of

loan proceeds over their lifetime. However, the home equity available to heirs will be

diminished.

18 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

4. Conclusion

We find that borrowing a reverse mortgage loan to get an increased Social Security benefit

carries significant costs that generally exceed the additional lifetime amount gained from

delaying Social Security. In addition, the amount that a consumer will need to borrow from a

reverse mortgage loan to delay claiming Social Security benefits could negatively affect the

consumer’s ability to move or use their home equity to meet a large expense later in life.

For consumers who have the option, working past age 62 is usually a less costly way to increase

their monthly Social Security benefit than borrowing from a reverse mortgage.

The extra years

of work often provide people more time to save for retirement and pay off debts. The extra years

of work may also result in an increase in Social Security benefits—separate from the increase

that arises from deferring the start of benefits—by replacing years with low or no earnings from

the person’s earnings record.

Consumers may also consider other options to increase their

Social Security benefit, such as coordinating their claiming decision with their spouses.

As consumers consider borrowing a reverse mortgage loan in order to delay claiming Social

Security benefits or defer withdrawing funds from retirement savings, it is important for them to

be aware of the risks and costs associated with this strategy. This is especially true for

For more information about considerations when claiming Social Security, see CFPB, 5 things to consider before

you collect your Social Security benefits (Nov. 2015), at

https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/blog/5-

things-to-consider-before-you-collect-your-social-security-benefits/ (last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

See SSA, How Work Affects Your Benefits (2017), at 7, available at https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10069.pdf.

19 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

consumers whose primary source of income is Social Security and whose main asset is their

home. For those consumers, the costs of a reverse mortgage loan will likely exceed the lifetime

amount of money gained from an increased Social Security benefit, which in turn may threaten

their financial security later in life.

Additional resources for consumers

• Learn more about reverse mortgages at consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb or contact a HUD

approved counselor at https://entp.hud.gov/idapp/html/hecm_agency_look.cfm, or by

phone at 800.569.4287

• If you have a problem with a reverse mortage, you can submit a complaint at

consumerfinance.gov/complaint

. We’ll forward your complaint to the company and work

to get you a response – generally within 15 days.

• If you don’t have a complaint but would like to share your experience – good or bad –

with a reverse mortgage, you can tell us your story at consumerfinance.gov/your-story

• Learn more about your Social Security claiming options and other factors to consider

when making this decision at consumerfinance.gov/retirement

20 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY AND ASSUMPTIONS

This issue brief relies on an example of a typical retiree taking a reverse mortgage at age 62 in

order to delay collecting Social Security benefits until age 67, the full retirement age for people

born after 1960. The example is constructed using a combination of assumptions based on key

figures drawn from different sources, some of which are published at different times. These

assumptions were used in our analysis:

Social Security monthly benefit- The examples assume a retirement benefit at full

retirement age of $1,300, which is approximately the average Social Security retirement benefit

for all beneficiaries receiving retirement benefits in 2014 according to the Social Security

Administration.

Claiming age- The examples assume that homeowners are using a reverse mortgage to delay

claiming their benefits from the earliest eligibility age (age 62) to their full retirement age (age

67, if born after 1960).

We applied the maximum reduction in benefits (30 percent) for

claiming at age 62. This reduction is the equivalent of 36 months times 5/9 of 1 percent plus 24

months times 5/12 of 1 percent.

Life expectancy- The examples assume an average life expectancy of age 85, which is

approximately the combined average life expectancy of a 62 year old woman and man in 2015

See SSA Monthly Statistical Snapshot, supra note 10.

See SSA, Retirement Planner: Full Retirement Age, https://www.ssa.gov/planners/retire/retirechart.html (last

visited Aug. 21, 2017)

See SSA, Early or Late Retirement?, https://www.ssa.gov/oact/quickcalc/early_late.html (last visited Aug. 21,

2017).

21 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

based on the actuarial life table.

According to a recent study, reverse mortgage borrowers’ self-

reported life expectancy is age 88.

Discount rates- The examples do not assume a discount rate or a cost of living adjustment.

The cumulative value of Social Security benefits for future years is presented in today’s dollars.

Home value- The examples assume a home value of $175,000, which is the median home

value for consumers 65 and 74 according to the 2013 Survey of Consumer Finances.

The

examples also assume an average appreciation rate of 4 percent per year.

Readers should note

that appreciation rates for homes owned by older homeowners are expected to be lower than the

average population.

See SSA, Actuarial Life Table, supra, note 15.

See Moulton Aging in Place Study, supra, note 34.

See Federal Reserve Board, Survey of Consumer Finances Chartbook, 2013 (Sep. 2014) at 586, available at

https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/files/BulletinCharts.pdf

Historical home price data shows that home values have increased at an average of 3.5 percent per year since 1991.

See Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), FHFA House Price Index Up 0.8 Percent in February (Apr. 2017), at

5, available at https://www.fhfa.gov/AboutUs/Reports/ReportDocuments/MonthlyHPI_42517.pdf

. When

choosing an appropriate rate we considered the requirements in the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) related to

disclosures for reverse mortgages. TILA requires that creditors provide information about the assumed home

appreciation rates in the disclosures using three possible appreciation rates 0, 4 or 8 percent. See 12 CFR §226.33.

See David Rodda & Satyendra Patrabansh, The Relationship Between Homeowner Age and House Price

Appreciation (2005), at 31-33, available at

https://www.huduser.gov/Publications/pdf/HouseAppreciation_and_age_relationship.pdf

22 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Reverse mortgage type- The examples assume that homeowners borrowed in equal monthly

installments from an adjustable rate reverse mortgage which is the only type of mortgage that

allows for a line of credit feature and multiple withdrawals.

Reverse mortgage interest rate- The interest rate used in our example is the average

adjustable interest rate for traditional adjustable HECM loans originated in December 2016

(4.625%).

While the examples are based on a person that has an adjustable rate mortgage, in

order to limit the number of assumptions, we assumed a constant rate of 4.625 percent

and a

Mortgage Insurance Premium (MIP) of 1.25 percent for the rest of the loan life. Market trends

show that 1-month LIBOR rates on which adjustable rates are based have increased in recent

years.

A long term increase in the 1-month LIBOR rate will result on increased interest rates

and borrowing costs.

Reverse mortgage costs- The examples assume that the homeowner financed the origination

and closing costs with the loan. To estimate these costs we relied upon NRMLA’s and HUD’s

breakdown of costs as listed in Figure 5.

Several closing costs listed in Figure 6 vary

significantly by state and locality.

See HUD, Frequently Asked Questions about HUD's Reverse Mortgages,

https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/housing/sfh/hecm/rmtopten

(last visited Aug. 21,

2017).

Id.

See HUD, HECM Snapshot December 2016,

https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/housing/rmra/oe/rpts/hecmsfsnap/hecmsfsnap

(last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

See Macrotrends, 1 Month LIBOR Rate - 30 Year Historical Chart, http://www.macrotrends.net/2518/1-month-

libor-rate-historical-chart (last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

See NRMLA, Application, Fees, and Disclosures, supra, note 29.

23 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

FIGURE 5: AVERAGE REVERSE MORTGAGE ORIGINATION AND CLOSING COSTS

Origination Costs

Origination fee 2%

Initial MIP 0.50%

Appraisal Fee $450

Closing Costs

Credit report fee $50

Flood Certification $20

Settlement or closing fee $800

Document fee $150

Recording fee $500

Courier fee $50

Title insurance $1,000

Pest inspection $100

Survey $250

Mortgage debt- The examples assume that homeowners own their homes free and clear. A

recent study of reverse mortgage borrowers found that many consumers who borrow reverse

mortgage have an outstanding mortgage.

If an outstanding mortgage were to be considered as

part of the calculations for these consumers, nearly half of the borrowers would have to use most

Id.

24 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

of their equity to delay Social Security or would not have enough money in their reverse

mortgage line of credit to borrow the amount needed to delay collecting Social Security.

Consider for example a reverse mortgage borrower with a home value at origination of

$200,000 and a mortgage of $43,000.

Based on the Principal Limit Factor of about 52

percent,

this homeowner will have approximately $61,000 available to cover the estimated

$54,600 needed to cover the amount not collected in Social Security benefits, after paying the

outstanding mortgage.

Taxes- The examples do not take into account the effects of taxes on the calculations.

Id. The example uses the median home value and home debt at origination for homeowners who were counseled

and borrowed a reverse mortgage loan amounts found in the Moulton study. See Moulton, Aging in Place Study,

supra, note 34.

See HUD, HECM Principal Limit Factor Tables - Effective Aug. 4, 2014,

http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=PLF_Tables_18-99.xls

(last visited Aug. 21, 2017).

25 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

APPENDIX B: REVERSE MORTGAGE LOAN BALANCES, HOME VALUE,

HOME EQUITY, AND SOCIAL SECURITY

Age Principal

Origination

Costs

Accrued

Interest

Accrued

MIP

Servicing

Fee

Total

Loan

Balance

Home

Value

Remaining

Home

Equity

Social

Security

Cumulative

amount

(claiming at

age 62)

Social

Security

Cumulative

amount

(claiming at

age 67)

62 $10,920 $7,745 - - - - $175,000 $175,000 - -

63 $10,920 - $619 $167 $420 $19,871 $182,000 $162,129 $10,920 -

64 $10,920 - $1,199 $322 $420 $32,732 $189,280 $156,548 $21,840 -

65 $10,920 - $1,813 $487 $420 $46,373 $196,851 $150,478 $32,760 -

66 $10,920 - $2,465 $663 $420 $60,840 $204,725 $143,885 $43,680 -

67 - - $3,156 $848 $420 $76,185 $212,914 $136,729 $54,600 -

68 - - $3,649 $981 $420 $81,235 $221,431 $140,196 $65,520 $15,600

69 - - $3,890 $1,046 $420 $86,591 $230,288 $143,697 $76,440 $31,200

The amounts reported at each age represent the total value of each data point at the end of the prior year. For example, the loan balance at age 63

represents the loan balance at age 62 with 12 months. As a result interest, fees and MIP accrued for amounts borrowed at age 62 are first reported at age

63.

26 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Age Principal

Origination

Costs

Accrued

Interest

Accrued

MIP

Servicing

Fee

Total

Loan

Balance

Home

Value

Remaining

Home

Equity

Social

Security

Cumulative

amount

(claiming at

age 62)

Social

Security

Cumulative

amount

(claiming at

age 67)

70 - - $4,146 $1,115 $420 $92,272 $239,500 $147,227 $87,360 $46,800

71 - - $4,418 $1,188 $420 $98,298 $249,080 $150,782 $98,280 $62,400

72 - - $4,706 $1,265 $420 $104,688 $259,043 $154,355 $109,200 $78,000

73 - - $5,011 $1,347 $420 $111,466 $269,404 $157,938 $120,120 $93,600

74 - - $5,335 $1,434 $420 $118,655 $280,181 $161,526 $131,040 $109,200

75 - - $5,678 $1,526 $420 $126,279 $291,388 $165,108 $141,960 $124,800

76 - - $6,043 $1,624 $420 $134,366 $303,043 $168,677 $152,880 $140,400

77 - - $6,429 $1,728 $420 $142,943 $315,165 $172,222 $163,800 $156,000

78 - - $6,839 $1,838 $420 $152,040 $327,772 $175,731 $174,720 $171,600

79 - - $7,273 $1,955 $420 $161,689 $340,883 $179,194 $185,640 $187,200

80 - - $7,734 $2,079 $420 $171,922 $354,518 $182,596 $196,560 $202,800

81 - - $8,223 $2,211 $420 $182,776 $368,699 $185,922 $207,480 $218,400

82 - - $8,742 $2,350 $420 $194,288 $383,447 $189,159 $218,400 $234,000

83 - - $9,292 $2,498 $420 $206,498 $398,784 $192,287 $229,320 $249,600

84 - - $9,875 $2,655 $420 $219,447 $414,736 $195,288 $240,240 $265,200

85 - - $10,494 $2,821 $420 $233,182 $431,325 $198,143 $251,160 $280,800